Skip to main content

Table 5 Principal features of PHECs obtained after structure modelling

From: The haustorial transcriptome of the cucurbit pathogen Podosphaera xanthii reveals new insights into the biotrophy and pathogenesis of powdery mildew fungi

Protein model

Score valuesa

Structural analogsb

Predicted features

C score

TM score

PDB file

Species

Activityc

Ligandsd

PHEC689

0.98

0.901

1QFX

Aspergillus niger

Histidine acid phosphatase

Phosphate ion

PHEC15509

−3.70

0.733

3C2H

Caenorhabditis elegans

Cell adhesion protein similar to integrin

Peptide

PHEC15584

−3.69

0.749

4QRK

Clostridium sporogenes

Cell adhesion protein

N-acetylglucosamine

PHEC15673

−0.26

0.934

2NBI

Cylindrotheca fusiformis

Cell wall protein pleuralin-1 with serine-rich region

Peptide

PHEC27213

−2

0.715

4MAH

Aspergillus oryzae

Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase with chitin binding domain

Zinc

PHEC217529

0.87

0.856

2M2J

Salmonella typhimurium

Flavin-binding protein dodecin

Nucleic acid

  1. aScore values represent the reliability of each model according to I-Tasser. C-score values measure the confidence of each model and are in the range of −5 to 2, where a higher value means a model with a higher confidence. TM-score values measure the structural similarity between two protein models. TM-score is in the range of 0 to 1, being 1 a perfect match between the models
  2. bProtein structurally close to the PHEC model according to I-TASSER prediction. PDB = Protein Data Bank
  3. cPutative activity based on the results obtained from software tools I-TASSER, Phyre2, CATH/3D gene and Motif Scan
  4. dLigand prediction according to COACH software