Skip to main content

Table 3 Datasets used to compare DNBseq™ and HiSeq platforms

From: Impact of sequencing depth and technology on de novo RNA-Seq assembly

SRA Run ID

Lab

Platform

# of Spots

# of Bases

Date Published

End

Length

ERR1831362

1

BGISEQ-500

48 148 821

9 629 764 200

2017-02-21

100 bp

ERR1831363

1

BGISEQ-500

29 782 959

5 956 591 800

2017-02-21

100 bp

ERR1831364

1

BGISEQ-500

54 940 056

10 988 011 200

2017-02-21

100 bp

ERR1831365

1

BGISEQ-500

36 073 210

7 214 642 000

2017-02-21

100 bp

ERR1831366

1

BGISEQ-500

43 664 065

8 732 813 000

2017-02-21

100 bp

ERR1831367

1

BGISEQ-500

55 025 946

11 005 189 200

2017-02-21

100 bp

ERR1831368

1

BGISEQ-500

53 296 161

10 659 232 200

2017-02-21

100 bp

ERR1831369

1

BGISEQ-500

65 455 754

13 091 150 800

2017-02-21

100 bp

ERR1831370

1

BGISEQ-500

29 774 053

5 954 810 600

2017-02-21

100 bp

SRR1261168

2

HiSeq 2000

134 921 154

26 984 230 800

2014-04-24

100 bp

SRR1261170

2

HiSeq 2000

72 897 482

14 579 496 400

2014-04-24

100 bp

SRR950078

3

HiSeq 2000

100 387 010

20 278 176 020

2013-08-29

101 bp

SRR950080

3

HiSeq 2000

91 781 477

18 539 858 354

2013-08-29

101 bp

SRR950084

3

HiSeq 2000

125 083 194

25 266 805 188

2013-08-28

101 bp

  1. All datasets were sourced from the NCBI and ENA Sequence Read Archives