Skip to main content

Table 2 Prediction accuracies of different genetic evaluation methods for each trait using information about the SOCS2 gene or not

From: Alternative methods improve the accuracy of genomic prediction using information from a causal point mutation in a dairy sheep model

 

Trait

MY

FY

PY

FC

PC

LSCS

TA

UC

UD

Prediction accuracy using

Pedigree-based BLUP

0.507

0.389

0.330

0.693

0.684

0.421

0.451

0.477

0.336

ssGBLUP

0.549

0.450

0.463

0.724

0.745

0.454

0.523

0.473

0.423

ssGBLUPSOCS2

0.550

0.450

0.465

0.724

0.745

0.456

0.523

0.473

0.424

WssGBLUP(classical, 1)

0.498

0.422

0.437

0.723

0.730

0.421

0.538

0.473

0.452

The best WssGBLUP(m, n) method

0.561

0.461

0.486

0.739

0.762

0.471

0.538

0.504

0.460

Pedigree-based Gene Content

0.557

0.430

0.405

0.698

0.688

0.438

0.448

0.512

0.366

Gain in prediction accuracy between

Pedigree-based BLUP & ssGBLUP

8.25%

15.54%

40.34%

4.41%

8.95%

7.80%

15.84%

-0.96%

26.07%

ssGBLUP & the best WssGBLUP method

2.16%

2.46%

5.04%

2.06%

2.32%

3.77%

2.80%

6.59%

8.75%

Without & with the SOCS2 SNP among the markers (average within the WssGBLUP(m, n) methods)

0.22%

0.13%

0.51%

0.02%

0.10%

1.06%

-0.02%

0.02%

0.26%

Pedigree-based BLUP & pedigree-based Gene Content

8.88%

9.54%

18.64%

0.68%

0.57%

3.80%

-0.89%

6.72%

8.33%

Parameters of the best WssGBLUP(m, n) method

Maximum 100

Maximum 200

Maximum 200

Maximum 40

Maximum 45

Mean 200

Classical

Sum 30

Maximum 5

  1. Abbreviations: MY Milk Yield, FY Fat Yield, PY Protein Yield, FC Fat Content, PC Protein Content, LSCS Somatic Cell Score, TA Teat Angle, UC Udder Cleft, UD Udder Depth