Skip to main content

Table 4 Meta-QTLs calculated from veraison QTLs overlapping with other phenology QTLs

From: Selection of candidate genes controlling veraison time in grapevine through integration of meta-QTL and transcriptomic data

LG

Meta-QTL

Peak Pos. (cM)

Mean R2

Start (cM)

End (cM)

Start (bp)a

End (bp)a

Pos Candidatesa

Original QTLs co-locatedb

QTL Studies (Populations)b

QTLc

Ref.d

III

ver/ph_3.1

27.67

0.15

24.43

30.92

560,404

1,647,064

138

5

3

VT, SSC, Bpc

[58, 83, 85]

ver/ph_3.2

50.42

0.14

45.30

55.54

5,903,464

10,894,193

288

4

3

VT, SSC, Bpc, BB

[58, 83, 85]

V

ver/ph_5.1

50.97

0.09

49.77

52.18

16,799,689

19,536,797

111

3

2

VT,F-V, Ma

[26, 53]

VII

ver/ph_7.1

9.59

0.16

7.58

11.60

1,087,707

1,552,842

59

2

2

VT, Fw

[53, 58]

XI

ver/ph_11.1

16.15

0.11

15.01

17.30

2,934,932

3,356,851

50

4

2

FBL, FS, Tar/Ma, VT

[25, 53]

XII

ver/ph_12.1

77.85

0.19

74.31

81.40

23,793,458

24,155,112

27

2

2

VT, RT

[26, 58]

XIV

ver/ph_14.1

55.03

0.22

51.45

58.62

22,441,297

24,645,689

157

7

4

B-F, FS, FT, VT

[23, 25, 26, 58]

XVI

ver/ph_16.1

34.70

0.31

32.53

36.88

14,012,548

16,583,139

126

4

2

F-V, VT

[22, 26]

ver/ph_16.2

38.49

0.38

36.49

40.50

16,503,904

17,318,604

51

5

2

F-V, VT

[23, 26]

XVII

ver/ph_17.1

48.83

0.13

45.12

52.54

4,969,509

6,401,642

113

6

3

FBL, FS, RDA, VB

[24, 25, 75]

ver/ph_17.2

61.83

0.11

61.46

62.20

8,920,888

9,063,993

12

7

4

FBL, FS, RDA, VB, F-V

[24,25,26, 75]

XVIII

ver/ph_18.1

34.68

0.17

28.21

41.15

1,836,848

5,349,350

322

2

2

VT, FT

[26, 58]

ver/ph_18.2

66.33

0.13

60.57

72.10

10,927,035

15,526,564

330

4

3

VT, FT, F-V

[23, 26, 58]

  1. aPhysical position and number of positional candidates were derived by anchoring of the genetic map to grape genome assembly 12X.v2
  2. bBoth number of original QTLs for the meta-QTL calculation as well as the number of independent populations from which the overlapping QTLs were found are given.
  3. cThe kind of overlapping phenology related QTLs used for the analysis is indicated. Veraison QTLs overlapping with other phenology QTLs are highlighted in bold. QTL short name abbreviations are as following: ssc solubile solids concentration, Fw Flowering, Ma Malic acid, Tar/Ma Ratio of tartaric acid to malic acid, BB Bud break, FT Flowering time, RT Ripening time, VT veraison time, F-V Flowering-veraison interval, B-F Budbreak–flowering/Flo, FBL Time of full bloom, FS Start of flowering, VB veraison beginning, RDA Ripening date, Bpc Brix per cluster. Further details about phenotypes scoring can be found in the Additional file 2, Additional file 19 or in the indicated original publications.
  4. dReference of the study in which the QTLs included in the meta-QTL analysis were found