Skip to main content

Table 1 Phenotypic trait performance of the RIL population and their parents evaluated in the field at Central Crops Research Station, Clayton, NC in years 2016 and 2017

From: High-density linkage map construction and QTL analyses for fiber quality, yield and morphological traits using CottonSNP63K array in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Type of phenotype

Phenotypic Traitb

Year

Parents

RILs

NC05AZ06 (P1)

NC11–2091 (P2)

P1-P2

Min

Max

Mean

SD

Fiber Quality

MIC (μg/inch)

2016

4.90

4.19

0.71b

3.69

7.02

4.81

0.55

2017

4.78

4.23

0.55c

3.65

6.20

4.79

0.46

UHM (Inches)

2016

1.12

0.82

0.3c

0.73

1.11

0.92

0.08

2017

1.14

0.85

0.3c

0.74

1.13

0.93

0.1

UI (%)

2016

82.25

76.43

5.82b

73.93

83.95

79.36

1.6

2017

83.20

79.73

3.48c

76.95

84.40

81.62

1.5

STR (g/tex)

2016

27.64

25.56

2.08b

22.31

32.57

26.82

2.13

2017

27.45

25.55

1.9b

20.90

30.55

25.49

2.23

ELO (%)

2016

6.92

6.74

0.19

3.85

12.54

7.26

1.28

2017

8.00

8.60

−0.6b

4.60

12.50

8.81

1.41

SFC (%)

2016

8.32

12.92

−4.61b

7.16

17.90

10.63

1.67

2017

8.35

10.55

−2.2c

6.85

17.10

9.05

1.61

Yield component-related

BW(g)

2016

4.92

1.59

3.33c

1.46

4.23

2.77

0.6

2017

6.23

1.93

4.3c

2.03

5.61

3.46

0.75

LP(%)

2016

40.8

17.2

23.6c

16.39

39.22

28.63

4.98

2017

40.3

15.5

24.8c

19.00

38.50

28.21

4.44

SI (g)

2016

10.19

8.18

2.01c

7.13

11.70

9.13

0.82

2017

11.15

9.91

1.24c

8.14

12.90

10.54

0.93

LI (g)

2016

7.00

1.70

5.3c

1.86

5.62

3.69

1.06

2017

7.48

1.79

5.69c

2.31

6.58

4.18

1.18

Morphological

PH (cm)

2017

44.3

65.6

−21.3c

32.15

66.25

48.04

4.95

FG (%)

2016

100

0

100c

0

100

66.7

38.2

2017

100

0

100c

0

100

43.8

37.9

  1. a MIC micronaire, UHM upper half mean length, UI uniformity index, STR fiber strength, ELO fiber elongation, SFC short fiber content, BW boll weight, LP lint percentage, SI seed index, LI lint index, PH plant height, FG fuzziness grade of seed
  2. b 0.05 significance level; c 0.01 significance level