Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Genomics

Fig. 3

From: Assessing the performance of different approaches for functional and taxonomic annotation of metagenomes

Fig. 3

Percentage of discordant assignments between the different methods, for mock metagenomes. Only reads that were classified by both compared methods are considered (i.e. unclassified reads by either method are excluded). A: Assignment by Megahit assembly mapping to: (g: genes; c: contigs; m: combination of contigs and genes). RR: Assignment by raw reads; KR: Kraken2; MP: Metaphlan2

Back to article page

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us