Skip to main content

Table 6 F-measure Comparison Results

From: An efficient simulated annealing algorithm for the RNA secondary structure prediction with Pseudoknots

ID

#BP

F-measure (%)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

PRSA

1

7

36.4

100.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

#

100.0

2

11

73.7

100.0

77.8

77.8

73.7

100.0

90.0

100.0

3

12

73.7

92.3

73.7

73.7

73.7

92.3

91.7

92.3

4

11

52.6

62.5

22.2

52.6

52.6

52.6

#

95.2

5

8

58.8

58.8

58.8

58.8

58.8

88.9

58.8

93.3

6

8

66.7

94.1

82.4

62.5

66.7

84.2

#

94.1

7

14

63.6

92.3

74.1

75.0

75.0

75.0

100.0

92.9

8

19

73.3

51.6

81.3

81.3

81.3

81.3

100.0

77.4

9

16

68.8

96.8

81.3

66.7

66.7

66.7

75.7

86.5

10

15

#

83.9

#

#

#

35.3

78.9

80.0

11

14

46.7

84.8

43.8

45.2

45.2

82.4

76.5

82.4

12

17

55.0

85.0

53.7

53.7

52.4

82.9

82.9

82.9

13

18

55.0

83.7

51.2

53.7

53.7

83.7

85.7

83.7

14

26

75.6

70.6

73.5

76.6

73.5

73.1

51.7

91.7

15

37

83.3

96.0

70.4

85.7

70.4

#

87.2

98.7

16

39

80.5

85.7

72.0

82.1

68.5

#

72.7

82.1

17

37

85.7

84.5

94.3

88.0

89.2

#

66.7

77.1

18

45

81.8

66.7

86.4

85.4

72.1

#

71.1

75.0

Average

66.5

82.7

67.1

68.8

66.0

74.9

79.1

88.0

  1. The best F-measure values for each algorithm are shown in boldface