Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparative analysis between results of the proposed method and other studies using 5-fold cross-validation

From: iPseU-NCP: Identifying RNA pseudouridine sites using random forest and NCP-encoded features

DatasetModelACC (%)SN (%)SP (%)MCCMethod
H_990iRNA-PseU60.4061.0159.800.21Chen et al., 2016
 PseUI64.2464.8563.640.28He et al., 2018
 iPseU-CNN66.6865.0068.780.34Tahir et al., 2019
 iPseU-NCP62.9258.7965.050.24Ours
S_628iRNA-PseU64.4964.6564.330.29Chen et al., 2016
 PseUI65.1362.7467.520.30He et al., 2018
 iPseU-CNN68.1566.3670.450.37Tahir et al., 2019
 iPseU-NCP69.5977.0762.100.40Ours
M_944iRNA-PseU69.0773.3164.830.38Chen et al., 2016
 PseUI70.4479.8770.340.41He et al., 2018
 iPseU-CNN71.8174.7969.110.44Tahir et al., 2019
 iPseU-NCP71.8267.3776.270.44Ours
  1. Values which are significantly higher than the others are in bold. Data excerpted from [16]