Skip to main content

Table 6 Sanger validation results for sample_002

From: A comparison of BeadChip and WGS genotyping outputs using partial validation by sanger sequencing

rsID Chromosome Position (GRCh38) BeadChip genotype WGS genotype Sanger genotype
rs12731384d 1 109711898 TG GG TT
rs1633365c 1 109711919 TC TT TC
rs58877308a 1 109712113 CG GG GG
rs138687644 1 109759369 GG GG G–
rs202018423b 1 109759339 CC CC CC
rs757293027 1 109759384 CC CC C–
rs760279355b 1 109759346 CC CC CC
rs767809812 1 109759359 DD II I–
rs79394341 1 109759361 GG GG G–
rs786205634a 2 85663647 DI II II
rs3832043d 2 233671807 II DI DD
rs144484152a 6 160246683 GG AA AA
rs149262397b 6 160246574 CC CC CC
rs316022a 6 160246568 GG AA AA
rs529525717b 6 160246473 GG GG GG
rs537568133a 6 160246590 TT CC CC
rs549969754b 6 160246607 CC CC CC
rs555024471 6 160246297 GG GG G–
rs563560445b 6 160246467 CC CC CC
rs563829592 6 160246443 GG GG G–
rs577352795 6 160246460 TT TT T–
rs757852385b 6 160246688 AA AA AA
rs759566284 6 160246458 GG GG G–
rs200896335 10 101010536 DD II NA
rs753420953 13 49792587 DD DI NA
rs397515367a 22 37973817 DD II II
  1. aconcordance between Sanger and WGS genotypes
  2. bconcordance between all three genotyping methods
  3. cconcordance between Sanger and BeadChip genotypes
  4. dabsence of concordance between any of the methods