Skip to main content

Table 2 Identification efficiency for ITS2 using BLAST1 and DISTANCE methods

From: Molecular identification and evolutionary relationships between the subspecies of Musa by DNA barcodes

Sample Name Sample Identified Methods of Identification Correct Identification (%) Ambiguous Identification (%)
Robusta M. aurantiaca BLAST1 97 3
DISTANCE 97.06 2.94
Nadan M. banksii BLAST1 96 3
DISTANCE 96.04 3.06
Wild Musa accuminatavar.burmanicoides AA Musa ABB BLAST1 99 1
DISTANCE 99.7 0.3
Wild Musa accuminata AA M. acuminata subsp. malaccensis BLAST1 99 1
DISTANCE 99.37 0.63
Njalipoovan AB Musa acuminata subsp. malaccensis BLAST1 98 2
DISTANCE 98.45 1.55
Wild Musa balbisiana BB Musa laterita BLAST1 98 2
DISTANCE 98.41 1.59
Wild Musa balbisiana BB Musa balbisiana BLAST1 98 2
DISTANCE 97.68 2.32
Wild Musa accuminata Musa accuminata BLAST1 96 4
DISTANCE 95.81 4.19
Cultivar Pisang lilin Musa acuminata var. zebrina BLAST1 99 1
DISTANCE 98.9 1.1
Cultivar Chemmatti - AA Musa campestris BLAST1 97 3
DISTANCE 96.7 3.3
Wild Musa accuminata Musa laterita BLAST1 95 5
DISTANCE 95.15 4.85
Cultivar Kunnan BA Musa acuminata subsp. malaccensis BLAST1 99 1
DISTANCE 99 1
Grandnain Musa acuminata BLAST1 94 6
DISTANCE 94.11 5.89
Cultivar Matti AA Musa acuminata var. zebrina BLAST1 99 1
DISTANCE 98.21 1.79
Red Banana Musa acuminata subsp. malaccensis BLAST1 99 1
DISTANCE 99.1 0.9