Skip to main content

Table 2 Identification efficiency for ITS2 using BLAST1 and DISTANCE methods

From: Molecular identification and evolutionary relationships between the subspecies of Musa by DNA barcodes

Sample Name

Sample Identified

Methods of Identification

Correct Identification (%)

Ambiguous Identification (%)

Robusta

M. aurantiaca

BLAST1

97

3

DISTANCE

97.06

2.94

Nadan

M. banksii

BLAST1

96

3

DISTANCE

96.04

3.06

Wild Musa accuminatavar.burmanicoides AA

Musa ABB

BLAST1

99

1

DISTANCE

99.7

0.3

Wild Musa accuminata AA

M. acuminata subsp. malaccensis

BLAST1

99

1

DISTANCE

99.37

0.63

Njalipoovan AB

Musa acuminata subsp. malaccensis

BLAST1

98

2

DISTANCE

98.45

1.55

Wild Musa balbisiana BB

Musa laterita

BLAST1

98

2

DISTANCE

98.41

1.59

Wild Musa balbisiana BB

Musa balbisiana

BLAST1

98

2

DISTANCE

97.68

2.32

Wild Musa accuminata

Musa accuminata

BLAST1

96

4

DISTANCE

95.81

4.19

Cultivar Pisang lilin

Musa acuminata var. zebrina

BLAST1

99

1

DISTANCE

98.9

1.1

Cultivar Chemmatti - AA

Musa campestris

BLAST1

97

3

DISTANCE

96.7

3.3

Wild Musa accuminata

Musa laterita

BLAST1

95

5

DISTANCE

95.15

4.85

Cultivar Kunnan BA

Musa acuminata subsp. malaccensis

BLAST1

99

1

DISTANCE

99

1

Grandnain

Musa acuminata

BLAST1

94

6

DISTANCE

94.11

5.89

Cultivar Matti AA

Musa acuminata var. zebrina

BLAST1

99

1

DISTANCE

98.21

1.79

Red Banana

Musa acuminata subsp. malaccensis

BLAST1

99

1

DISTANCE

99.1

0.9