Temporal transcriptomic differences between tolerant and susceptible genotypes contribute to rice drought tolerance

Table 2 Osmotic potential and H₂O₂ content (Mean ± SE) measured during drought (D1-D5) and at recovery (R) in the tolerant and the susceptible groups from well-watered (W) and drought (D) fields. Different letters indicate significant differences by one-way ANOVA (SNK method) during drought period (D1-D5). “*” indicates significant difference at p < 0.05 by independent t-test between the tolerant and the susceptible groups at the recovery stage

Trait	Group	Field	Time point
Trait	Group	Field	D1	D2	D3	D4	D5	R
Osmotic potential	Susceptible	Drought-treated	493.8 ± 11.6a	590.2 ± 15.7bc	498.2 ± 10.8b	595.5 ± 14.9c	648.4 ± 6.3b	593.3 ± 16.7*
	Susceptible	Well-watered	494.7 ± 8.1a	530.2 ± 14.2a	419.2 ± 20.9a	504.2 ± 11.1a	524.8 ± 9.9a	NA
	Tolerant	Drought-treated	536.9 ± 11.8b	621.8 ± 15.8c	548.2 ± 21.2c	673.2 ± 14.4d	708.1 ± 15.8c	641.1 ± 15.8*
	Tolerant	Well-watered	545 ± 10.3b	565.7 ± 13.1ab	435.8 ± 10.8a	545.9 ± 14.7b	547.5 ± 10.7a	NA
H2O2 content (mmol/g FW)	Susceptible	Drought-treated	0.403 ± 0.054b	0.594 ± 0.112a	0.583 ± 0.101b	0.539 ± 0.09b	0.654 ± 0.126b	0.576 ± 0.096*
	Susceptible	Well-watered	0.358 ± 0.061b	0.532 ± 0.117a	0.354 ± 0.057a	0.41 ± 0.078ab	0.453 ± 0.093ab	NA
	Tolerant	Drought-treated	0.199 ± 0.019a	0.292 ± 0.036a	0.287 ± 0.018a	0.301 ± 0.028a	0.353 ± 0.02a	0.334 ± 0.012*
	Tolerant	Well-watered	0.167 ± 0.014a	0.318 ± 0.054a	0.224 ± 0.042a	0.243 ± 0.01a	0.29 ± 0.05a	NA

ISSN: 1471-2164