Skip to main content

Table 1 Enrichment scores for DAVID annotation clusters

From: Initial response of ovarian tissue transcriptome to vitrification or microwave-assisted dehydration in the domestic cat model

Annotation cluster

Enrichment score

#genes

#terms

DEG source

DEG regulation

Visualization

Mitochondrial respiration

4.50

13

17

V vs F

up

Figure 3a

Transmembrane

2.07

16

3

V vs F

down

Figure 3a

Fibronectin type III

4.15

20

3

D10 vs F

down

Figure 5a

Transmembrane

3.73

56

4

D10 vs F

down

Figure 5a

Immunoglobulin-like domain

3.16

19

8

D10 vs F

down

Figure 5a

Ras signaling

2.34

17

6

D10 vs F

down

Figure 5a

IPT

2.03

6

3

D10 vs F

down

Figure 5a

RNA polymerase II activity

1.51

10

4

D10 vs F

down

Figure 5a

Transcription regulation, RNA polymerase II

1.18

12

4

D10 vs F

down

Figure 5a

Semaphorin

1.42

5

7

D10 vs F

down

Figure 5a

Cadherin

1.32

5

5

D10 vs F

down

Figure 5a

Transmembrane

1.76

32

4

V vs F

up&down

Figure 6a

Transmembrane

4.28

58

4

D10 vs F

up&down

Figure 6a

Leucine-rich repeat

1.18

5

6

D10 vs F

up&down

Figure 6a

  1. Enrichment score: ranks the biological significance of gene groups based on overall EASE scores of all enriched annotation terms. Higher number indicates higher biological significance of the cluster
  2. IPT Immunoglobulin-like, plexins and transcription factors
  3. F Fresh ovarian tissue after dissection, V Vitrified/warmed tissue, D10 Tissue dehydrated for 10 min and rehydrated