Table 3 Homoeolog expression levels of genes that were displayed ELD in four tissues of B. napus
Homoeolog regulation in B. napus | Stems | Leaves | Flowers | Siliques | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
II | XI | IV | IX | II | XI | IV | IX | II | XI | IV | IX | II | XI | IV | IX | |
Both homoeologs up-regulated | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
Only A homoeolog up-regulated | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 44 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
Only C homoeolog up-regulated | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 |
A up- and C down-regulated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Both homoeologs down-regulated | 2 | 17 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 41 | 0 | 14 | 7 | 17 | 0 | 13 |
Only A homoeolog down-regulated | 1 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 64 | 0 | 16 | 6 | 25 | 0 | 11 |
Only C homoeolog down-regulated | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 17 |
A down- and C up-regulated | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
Homoeolog from non-dominant progenitor up-regulated | 42 | – | 5 | – | 6 | – | 4 | – | 88 | – | 34 | – | 70 | – | 18 | – |
Homoeolog from dominant progenitor up-regulated | 3 | – | 2 | – | 2 | – | 0 | – | 10 | – | 24 | – | 7 | – | 9 | – |
Homoeolog from non-dominant progenitor down-regulated | – | 28 | – | 14 | – | 5 | – | 0 | – | 109 | – | 27 | – | 43 | – | 30 |
Homoeolog from dominant progenitor down-regulated | – | 20 | – | 11 | – | 3 | – | 0 | – | 51 | – | 31 | – | 25 | – | 24 |