Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation analysis of three types of mutation

From: Comparative chloroplast genomes: insights into the evolution of the chloroplast genome of Camellia sinensis and the phylogeny of Camellia

Comparison

CSA

CIA

CWN

Repeats and Substitutions

 Correlation between repeats and substitutions (r)

0.033

0.049

0.028

 Significance of correlation (t)

0.103**

0.103**

0.145**

 Coefficient of determination (r2)

0.0011

0.0024

0.0008

Indels and Substitutions

 Correlation between indels and substitutions (r)

0.207

0.435

0.165

 Significance of correlation (t)

0.158**

0.195**

0.144**

 Coefficient of determination (r2)

0.043

0.189

0.0273

Repeats and Indels

 Correlation between repeats and indels (r)

0.090

0.099

0.120

 Significance of correlation (t)

0.195**

0.221**

0.268**

 Coefficient of determination (r2)

0.0081

0.0098

0.0145

  1. Comparisons among the pairwise alignments (CSS taken as a Reference) to calculate the correlations between Repeats and Substitutions, Insertion-Deletions (Indels) and Substitutions, and Repeats and Indels. The alignments were partitioned into 630 nonoverlapping bins of 250 bp size each to calculate these correlations. ** indicated high significance. CWN ‘Wuyi narcissus’ cultivar of C. sinensis var. sinensis (natural triploid Chinary type tea), CSS C. sinensis var. sinensis (diploid Chinary type tea), CSA C. sinensis var. assamica (diploid Chinese Assamica type tea), CIA C. sinensis var. assamica (diploid Indian Assamica type tea)