Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Genomics

Fig. 3

From: Evaluation of tools for identifying large copy number variations from ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data

Fig. 3

Performance evaluation of the six copy number variation (CNV) algorithms using the simulated data with the stringent criteria: at least 80 % overlap between the inferred and ground truth CNVs and no filtering by CNV length. a True positive rate (TPR), b False discovery rate (FDR), and c F1 score of the CNV detections achieved by the different tools when the read coverage is varied. For each algorithm and coverage, the data point values depict the performance values achieved using the window setting that provided the highest F1 score (Supplementary Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Error bars denote the standard error of the results generated from the results of 20 different random subsets

Back to article page