Fig. 4From: Evaluation of nine statistics to identify QTLs in bulk segregant analysis using next generation sequencing approachesNGS-based BSA case study in the absence of a QTL effect and with a QTL effect equivalent to 5.9% (k = 0.5) and 20% (k = 1) of phenotypic variance. Results using binomial distribution (A) and real data from rice (B) to simulate sequencing noise. In each graph, the grey dots correspond to the statistics value at marker level (i.e., EDm); the black line shows the smoothed value of the statistic (i.e., ED1004)Back to article page