Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | BMC Genomics

Fig. 6

From: Simultaneous testing of rule- and model-based approaches for runs of homozygosity detection opens up a window into genomic footprints of selection in pigs

Fig. 6

Size distribution and overlap of ROHs detected using PLINK_A and PLINK_B. For each parameter set (PLINK_A, PLINK_B), the number of ROHs per size category are displayed for each investigated breed (x-axis: ASxMA: Angeln Saddleback × Mangalitza, BP: Bentheim Black Pied, DU: Duroc, GMN: Goettingen Minipig, GO: Gloucester Old Spot, HR: Husum Red Pied, HRxAS: Husum Red Pied × Angeln Saddleback, IB: Iberian, KK: Kune, LR × YS × PI: Landrace × Yorkshire × Pietrain, MA: Mangalitza, MH: Meishan, ML: Mini-Lewe, MN: Minipig, MN × MG: Minipig × Mangalitza, PI: Pietrain, TP: Turopolje, WMN: Wuzhishan minipig, YMN: Yucatan miniature pig, YS: Yorkshire). All ROHs were assigned to size categories of “0–20 kb”, 20–50 kb”,”50–250 kb”,”250–500 kb”,”500–1000 kb”,” > 1000 kb” (indicated on top) and the proportion of ROHs overlapping with the other tool or parameter set was highlighted in orange and designated as “yes”

Back to article page