Skip to main content

Table 2 Statistics of the quality and alignment efficiency of transcriptome sequencing

From: Comparative transcriptome analysis of longissimus dorsi tissues with different intramuscular fat contents from Guangling donkeys

Sample

Raw Reads

Clean Reads (%)

Reads mapped (%)

Mapped to exon (%)

Clean Base (G)

Q30 (%)

H1

57,607,030

56,456,182 (98.00)

53,525,206 (94.81%)

78.70

8.47

93.8

H2

67,485,908

66,252,450 (98.17)

63,065,876 (95.19%)

85.88

9.94

95.36

H3

59,360,730

58,221,334 (98.08)

55,414,202 (95.18%)

87.85

8.73

95.22

L1

67,336,812

66,247,312 (98.38)

62,894,562 (94.94%)

83.57

9.94

94.94

L2

64,402,184

63,211,670 (98.15)

60,222,790 (95.27%)

87.50

9.48

95.24

L3

62,628,782

61,565,326 (98.30)

58,822,760 (95.55%)

86.58

9.23

95.55

  1. Q30: A percentage of the bases with a Qphred value of not less than 30
  2. Reads mapped: Number of reads mapped to the reference genome