Skip to main content

Table 4 QTL for growth and wood properties detected by rMQM mapping in the Pinus radiata QTL population

From: High density linkage maps, genetic architecture, and genomic prediction of growth and wood properties in Pinus radiata

Trait

Population and parent

LG

cMa

Adjacent markerb

LODc

PVEd

KW Supporte

Validatedf

Silviscan traitsf

WD

QTL/405

4

58.4

63204602_117107

3.44

16.7

****

 

Tan

QTL/405

4

37.0

63055824_6340

2.56

12.7

**

 

Wall

QTL/405

4

76.1

63177503_30587

4.40**

18.9

**

 

QTL/405

11

5.1

62510986_25015

2.80

11.5

*

DBH (4.85)

Sur

QTL/405

4

75.1

63177503_30587

4.45**

19.1

**

 

QTL/405

11

5.1

62510986_25015

2.82

11.6

*

DBH (4.85)

MFA

QTL/405

11

94.9

62955572_13326

2.82

13.9

  

MOE

QTL/405

4

52.1

63204602_174680

2.32

11.5

*

 

Other traits

JWD_B

QTL/405

10

72.4

58974239_18736

2.43

12.0

***

%LW1-10 (0)

JWD

QTL/405

10

72.4

58974239_18736

2.37

11.8

**

%LW1-10 (0)

DBH

QTL/405

1

172.3

62736216_20622

2.73

13.7

**

 

Silviscan traits

Area

QTL/345

3

35.1

62962718_10700

3.09*

12.2

**

 

QTL/345

4

115.6

62596398_9713

2.55

9.9

*

 

QTL/345

5

90.7

63227690_179297

2.39

9.4

**

 

WD

QTL/345

12

187.6

63206125_97028

2.23

11.2

*

 

Rad

QTL/345

1

25.5

63090351_5536

2.82

12.2

**

 

QTL/345

5

171.1

62991642_9036

2.11

9.0

**

 

Tan

QTL/345

1

36.6

63118470_4543

2.09

10.5

**

 

Wall

QTL/345

12

186.6

63206125_97028

2.49

12.3

*

 

Sur

QTL/345

12

186.6

63206125_97028

2.47

12.3

*

 

MFA

QTL/345

1

103.4

63206856_147794

2.71

13.4

**

 

Other traits

JWD_A

QTL/345

4

184.8

63016409_79396

2.87

12.8

**

 

QTL/345

3

82.0

62923239_33293

2.46

11.0

*

 

JWD_B

QTL/345

4

185.8

63016409_79396

3.38*

13.8

**

 

QTL/345

5

57.1

62362541_2029

2.52

10.1

*

 

QTL/345

3

82.0

62923239_33293

2.11

8.4

  

DBH

QTL/345

3

14.8

62962718_10700

3.81*

17.4

**

 

QTL/345

10

7.0

63227371_228101

2.38

10.8

*

 
  1. aQTL LOD peak position
  2. bClosest marker to QTL LOD peak
  3. cGenome wide significance * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01. The remaining QTL were significant at the suggestive level (chromosome-wide type I error rate < 0.05)
  4. dThe percent variation explained at each QTL peak
  5. eKruskal-Wallis significance at the closest marker (ie adjacent marker) to each QTL peak. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001
  6. fPositonal support for QTL from those found in the FWK population, all of which were significant at the suggestive level. In each case, the trait for which the supporting QTL was found is shown, (#) indicates average distance to the closest shared marker to each of the QTL in each map
  7. fSilviscan traits are an average from two measurements: tree-rings 1–5 and tree-rings 6–10