Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Optimizing next-generation sequencing efficiency in clinical settings: analysis of read length impact on cost and performance

Original Submission
16 Feb 2024 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jun 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Zachariah Demaere
2 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Jul 2024 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Milet Meirelles
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jul 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Aug 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Aug 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Zachariah Demaere
21 Aug 2024 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Milet Meirelles
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Aug 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Aug 2024 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Milet Meirelles
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Aug 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 5
3 Sep 2024 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Milet Meirelles
Resubmission - Version 6
3 Sep 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
4 Sep 2024 Editorially accepted
12 Sep 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12864-024-10778-1

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page