A systematic evaluation of expression of HERV-W elements; influence of genomic context, viral structure and orientation
© Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 10 June 2010
Accepted: 12 January 2011
Published: 12 January 2011
One member of the W family of human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) appears to have been functionally adopted by the human host. Nevertheless, a highly diversified and regulated transcription from a range of HERV-W elements has been observed in human tissues and cells. Aberrant expression of members of this family has also been associated with human disease such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and schizophrenia. It is not known whether this broad expression of HERV-W elements represents transcriptional leakage or specific transcription initiated from the retroviral promoter in the long terminal repeat (LTR) region. Therefore, potential influences of genomic context, structure and orientation on the expression levels of individual HERV-W elements in normal human tissues were systematically investigated.
Whereas intronic HERV-W elements with a pseudogene structure exhibited a strong anti-sense orientation bias, intronic elements with a proviral structure and solo LTRs did not. Although a highly variable expression across tissues and elements was observed, systematic effects of context, structure and orientation were also observed. Elements located in intronic regions appeared to be expressed at higher levels than elements located in intergenic regions. Intronic elements with proviral structures were expressed at higher levels than those elements bearing hallmarks of processed pseudogenes or solo LTRs. Relative to their corresponding genes, intronic elements integrated on the sense strand appeared to be transcribed at higher levels than those integrated on the anti-sense strand. Moreover, the expression of proviral elements appeared to be independent from that of their corresponding genes.
Intronic HERV-W provirus integrations on the sense strand appear to have elicited a weaker negative selection than pseudogene integrations of transcripts from such elements. Our current findings suggest that the previously observed diversified and tissue-specific expression of elements in the HERV-W family is the result of both directed transcription (involving both the LTR and internal sequence) and leaky transcription of HERV-W elements in normal human tissues.
Recent analyses of the transcriptional landscape of human cells and tissues indicate that far more than the 2% of human genome that encodes proteins exhibit tissue-specific and regulated transcription resulting in a large number of different RNA species without apparent coding capacity . Such analyses, however, focused on the non-repetitive regions and consequently little is known on the extent of transcription in repetitive regions of the human genome.
Five to eight percent of the human genome consists of retroviral sequences acquired during evolution . These sequences can be grouped into at least 31 families of human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) . Although expression of different HERV families has been associated to a range of human diseases and pathological conditions, very little is known of their basal expression, regulation and potential functional roles. A prominent exception, however, is the ERVWE1 locus on chromosome 7q. This locus harbors a member of the HERV-W family with an open reading frame in the env gene that encodes a protein denoted syncytin . This protein is highly expressed in the syncytiotrophoblast layer of the human placenta and appears to have been functionally adopted by the human host for fusion of trophoblast cells and thus contributing to the formation of the syncytiotrophoblast layer .
These observations raise questions regarding the mechanisms responsible for generating such transcripts. Do they constitute products of leaky transcription of adjacent genes, unprocessed pre-mRNAs or are they independently initiated from the retroviral LTR (or other promoters)? The purpose of the present study was therefore to systematically determine the influence of the genomic context, structure and orientation on the expression of HERV-W elements. Understanding the transcriptional regulation of HERV-W elements will contribute to a better understanding of some of the least studied regions of the human genome and can shed light on mechanisms underlying the associations between expression of HERV-W elements and complex human diseases, such as MS [14, 15] and schizophrenia [16, 17].
Distribution of HERV-W elements in the human genome
Distribution of HERV-W elements.
Expression levels of intronic and intergenic HERV-W elements
Expression levels of intronic elements, the roles of the U3 region and internal sequence
The findings of such systematic differences in expression levels suggest transcriptional initiation in the HERV-W LTR. To further investigate this issue, we randomly selected three elements from each of the categories of intronic proviral-and pseudoelements. These included elements integrated both sense and anti-sense to their corresponding genes. Assays directed at the most proximal non-repetitive region 5' of each of these elements were designed and employed on the eight normal human tissues. According to our analyses, transcripts containing regions 3' of proviral HERV-W elements were more abundant than those containing regions 5' of these elements. However, levels of transcripts containing sequences 3' and 5' of pseudoelements did not differ (Figure 3B). A comparison of the individual elements, indicate that regions 3' of two pseudoelements were in fact expressed at significantly lower levels than their corresponding 5' regions (additional file 1: fig. S1B). These elements in FOXP2 and NRCAM, respectively were both integrated on the anti-sense strand. Taken together, these findings indicate functional promoter activity of the proviral LTR.
Next we compared levels of transcripts 3' of intronic proviral elements with those 3' of intronic solo LTRs. This comparison indicated that transcription 3' of proviral elements was significantly higher than that 3' of solo LTRs (Figure 3C). Again, this difference was consistently observed across all tissues (additional file 3). To determine whether the additional LTR or the internal sequence present in the proviral elements contributed to this difference in expression levels we subsequently compared levels of transcripts 3' of intronic elements that contained both 5'- and 3'-LTRs (dual) with those 3' of intronic elements lacking either the 3'- or the 5'- LTR (single) and with those 3' of solo LTRs (solo). We noted higher levels of transcripts 3' of proviral elements with single LTRs than 3' of proviral elements with dual LTRs or solo LTRs (Figure 3D). Spliced transcripts from corresponding genes were all detected at comparable levels (Figure 3D).
Expression of intergenic elements
Among the 10 intergenic HERV-W elements investigated, expression levels did not differ between proviral and pseudoelements (additional file 4: fig. S4A). The U3-region of the LTRs of intergenic proviral elements did therefore not appear to influence expression and these elements may be expressed as a consequence of transcriptional leakage. We reasoned that intergenic elements can potentially be transcribed as a consequence of read-through transcription of upstream genes. The likelihood of such events to occur would be expected to be highest for elements located close to highly expressed genes. Surprisingly, our analyses revealed an inverse correlation between the levels of transcription of intergenic elements and their downstream genes (additional file 4: fig. S4B), while no correlation was observed between expression levels of intergenic elements and their upstream genes. Moreover, no evidence for correlations between expression levels of intergenic elements and their distance from either upstream or downstream genes was observed.
Effect of orientation of HERV-W element on expression
Dependent or independent transcription of intronic HERV-W elements
Regulated transcription of HERV-W elements
As for other HERV-families, the majority of surviving elements in the W family are located outside of protein-coding genes . The percentage of intronic elements in this family (28%) is comparable to the percentage of bases spanned by human genes [20, 21] suggesting that these integrations were not biased with regard to genic or intergenic regions. It should be noted that the unbiased integration also applies to pseudoelements which presumably have integrated by L1-mediated retrotransposition of proviral transcripts [6, 7] that differ from the original proviral integrations. Throughout the human genome, solo LTRs outnumbered proviral elements 3.2:1 suggesting that homologous recombination has occurred frequently during human evolution. The distribution of solo LTRs to genic and intergenic regions was comparable to that of proviral elements suggesting that such homologous recombinations were also neutral with regard to genic/intergenic regions. As has been previously reported , intronic elements exhibit a strong anti-sense bias. The proportions of proviral elements and solo LTRs integrated on the anti-sense strand did not differ suggesting that homologous recombinations were equally common on the sense and on the anti-sense strands in genic regions. In fact, the total proportion of proviral elements and solo LTRs on the sense strand did not differ significantly from that expected by chance. It seems, rather, that it is the small proportion of intronic pseudoelements that have survived on the sense strand that accounts for the overall anti-sense bias of intronic HERV-W elements. This latter observation indicates that pseudogene integrations have elicited stronger negative selection than proviral integrations on the sense strand of coding regions. Alternatively, this finding indicates strand-preference of L1-mediated integrations.
In the present study we found that the genomic context, structure and orientation of elements in the HERV-W family appear to influence their expression. While systematic effects of these features were observed throughout a range of normal human tissues, it should also be noted that a considerable degree of variation in transcripts levels was observed across individual tissues and elements. From a methodological point, it should here be noted that the variation, evident in additional file 2 strongly argues against any significant contribution to the results demonstrated here by contaminating genomic DNA. Moreover, the absence of detectable target transcripts by some of the assays in some of the tissues offers further support for this argument. The current findings are thus in general agreement with previous reports of wide-spread expression of HERV-W elements in human cells and tissues [11–13]. The quantitative differences observed here for individual elements across human tissues are also in line with previous studies of a small number of individual HERV-W elements in human cell-lines  and of the collective expression level of HERV-W elements in human tissues [16, 22, 23]. The current observations also support previous sequencing and mapping studies detecting transcription from HERV-W elements located in both intronic and intergenic regions [11–13].
Based on the current data, intronic elements appear to be, in general, expressed at higher levels than their intergenic counterparts, regardless of the structure of their LTR. In their study of human-specific HERV-K promoter activities, Buzdin and coworkers, also observed a major influence of genomic context on the activity of HERV-K LTRs. A larger proportion of LTRs in gene-rich regions appeared transcriptionally active as compared to LTRs in gene-poor regions . Taken together, these finding thus appear to be in general agreement with a recent study by van Bakel and coworkers . Based on data from transcriptome-sequencing of human tissues, these authors concluded that the abundance of intergenic transcripts was low compared to transcripts from known genes. Of the intronic HERV-W elements investigated here, those with a proviral structure were expressed at higher levels than those with a pseudoelement structure. While this might have been a consequence of higher transcriptional activities of genes with proviral integrations, our observations indicate the reverse to be true. Spliced transcripts from genes with proviral element integrations were in fact expressed at significantly lower levels than those from genes with pseudoelement integrations in all tissues investigated. These systematic findings suggest functionality of the U3-region of the proviral LTR in initiating and regulating transcription of proviral HERV-W elements in vivo. To avoid issues regarding specificity and sensitivity, we here assayed transcription harboring non-repetitive regions proximal to the 3' end of the HERV-W elements investigated. Genomic distances were verified by PCRs on human genomic DNA. Clearly distinguishable amplicons of expected sizes were, however, generated only after careful optimization illustrating the difficulties involved when using primers in repetitive elements. By the approach taken here, transcriptional initiation outside of the LTR cannot be distinguished from LTR-initiated transcription. Moreover termination of transcription 5' of the assayed region would lead to underestimations of transcription levels. In only 3 out of 22 cases were we unable to "link" elements with their corresponding non-repetitive 3'-regions at the level of transcription in the samples investigated. Distance of the assayed region from the site of oligo-d(T) initiated reverse transcription can also confound results in this type of study. By comparing the transcriptional activity 5' with that 3' of six intronic HERV-W loci in eight tissues we observed significantly higher expression level 3' of proviral elements but not 3' of pseudoelements. This finding further support transcription originating in the U3 region of the LTR which is expected to lead to higher transcript-levels from regions 3' than 5' of the promoter. Expression levels of the two regions would presumably be more uniform if our assays detected the same un-spliced pre-mRNA of coding genes, as for the pseudoelements investigated. We even observed lower transcript levels 3' than 5' of the pseudoelements in the anti-sense orientation which may be due to a longer distance from the site-of-initiation of reverse transcription. These findings in normal tissues are thus in agreement with previous studies of the ERVWE1 locus in placental cells and a more recent study of intergenic HERV-W loci in testicular tumors where transcription of intergenic proviral elements appeared to be initiated in the U3 region of the LTR . Functionality of the U3 region of the HERV-W LTR is further supported by the observations that also solitary LTRs appeared to have retained their potential to initiate transcriptional activity. The finding that intronic transcripts of proviral elements, particularly those with only one intact LTR, were detected at significantly higher levels than those of solo LTRs, however indicates that the internal sequence (i.e. gag, pol and/or env) also has some impact on the levels of transcripts generated. A similar observation was also observed among elements in the HERV-K family suggesting that regulatory elements are present in the internal sequence . Noticeably, intronic proviral elements with a single LTR displayed higher levels of transcription than those containing dual LTRs, potentially indicating transcriptional termination in the 3' LTR. Such termination would thus lead to an underestimation of the transcriptional activities of proviral integrations by our current analytical approach.
Regardless of U3 region, the orientation of intronic HERV-W elements appears to be an important determinant of their level of expression with elements on the sense strand being expressed at higher relative levels than those on the anti-sense strand. That this does not apply to solo LTRs, further supports the conclusion that the internal sequences present in both proviral elements and pseudoelements can modify the level of transcription.
According to our linear regression analyses, transcription of intronic proviral elements and solo LTRs, in general, appeared to be independent of their corresponding genes. Expression of most, but not all, intronic elements lacking the U3 region on the other hand appeared to be dependent on expression of their corresponding genes.
Transcriptional regulation of HERV-W elements is further supported by our observations in primary human fibroblasts. The overall increase in relative levels of transcripts containing gag sequence following virus infection extends our previous findings in human cell-lines . Our qualitative analyses of gag amplicons in such cultures serve to illustrate the large number of transcribed loci in these cells and the alterations in the proportions of transcripts from these following virus infection, as we previously observed in serum-starved cells . Independent and regulated expression of individual HERV-W elements with a proviral structure was further supported by our findings in the fibroblast cultures. Only transcripts 3' of such elements increased beyond that of corresponding spliced transcripts. Taken together, these findings support the previously reported functionality of the U3 region of HERV-W LTRs [8, 9] and indicate that transcripts containing intronic pseudoelements are more likely to represent unprocessed pre-mRNAs or leaky transcription of coding genes.
We observed an inverse correlation between expression of intergenic HERV-W elements and their corresponding downstream genes. These correlations appeared independent of viral structure and might therefore reflect general mechanisms such as structural changes in the chromatin  or methylation patterns of genomic regions upstream of transcribed genes [28, 29].
In addition to the general influences of genomic context, structure and orientation noted above, other mechanisms are also likely to affect the level of transcription of individual HERV-W elements. For example, differences in methylation levels of the individual LTRs, as reported for LTRs in the HERV-E family  and for the 5'-LTR, in the proviral HERV-W element encoding syncytin [9, 31] can contribute to variation across tissues. Gimenez and coworkers recently reported that while hypomethylation of the promoter domain of intergenic HERV elements appears to be a prerequisite for the increased expression observed in tumor as compared to normal tissue, the methylation status of the promoter does not predict expression levels . Thus, sequence-differences between the different U3 regions affecting transcription factor binding motifs  are also likely to contribute to the variation in expression across individual elements observed here.
Earlier studies have reported that a number of endogenous proviral LTRs in the HERV-E, -I, -R and -H families have been co-opted during human evolution as alternative promoters of individual genes conferring additional transcriptional control [32, 33]. More recent analyses of large-scale gene expression data indicate that thousands of cellular transcripts are in fact initiated at HERV LTRs suggesting that HERVs have significantly contributed to shaping the human transcriptome . The tissue-specific distribution of HERV-W transcripts was illustrated in a recent high-resolution melting temperature analysis of expressed HERV-W gag sequences . This approach indicated diversified and non-random expression-patterns of such sequences in human tissues. In fact, based on correlations between patterns of HERV-W gag expression, dendrograms could be constructed resembling those based on gene expression patterns. Based on the present findings we suggest that both LTR mediated and leaky transcription of the human genome contribute to such tissue-specific patterns of HERV-W transcripts. Thus, the aberrant HERV-W expression associated with complex human diseases such as MS [14, 15] and schizophrenia [16, 17] may be a reflection of cellular events acting on promoters of genes harboring HERV-W elements or on proviral LTRs. Current in vivo findings support previous findings in vitro that the large numbers of solitary LTRs in the HERV-W family can also actively contribute promoter activity, as has been reported for solitary LTRs in HERV-K family . If members of the HERV-W family, other than the proviral element in the ERVWE1 locus, contribute functional transcripts, however, remains to be established.
We found a broad and variable expression of HERV-W elements in normal human tissues. Previously observed diversified and regulated expression of HERV-W elements appears to be due to both directed and leaky transcription of the human genome.
Identification of HERV-W elements in the human genome
HERV-W loci were identified by BLAT searches  of the human genome (March 2006 assembly) using the HERV17 internal sequence or the LTR17 sequence from Repbase Update . Loci were defined as intronic if located within the boundaries of annotated RefSeq genes .
Primers used for assay design.
Intronic HERV-W proviral element (3' region)
Gene harboring provirus
CD72 intron 1
CD72 exon 1~2
TBX18 intron 7
TBX18 exon 7~8
ACOX3 intron 1
ACOX3 exon 1~2
KYNU intron 2
KYNU exon 2~3
THEM2 intron 1
THEM2 exon 1~2
ZNF678 intron 1
ZNF678 exon 1~2
ANO3 intron 14
ANO3 exon 14~15
Intronic HERV-W proviral element (5' region)
CD72 intron 1
TBX18 intron 7
ANO3 intron 14
Intronic HERV-W pseudoelement (3' region)
Gene harboring pseudoelement
SLC16A10 intron 1
SLC16A10 exon 1~2
AK024261 intron 1
AK024261 exon 1~2
FOXP2 intron 3
FOXP2 exon 3~4
APG5 intron 6
APG5 exon 6~7
KIAA0423 exon 7~8
NRCAM intron 2
NRCAM exon 2~3
ZMAT3 intron 2
ZMAT3 exon 2~3
Intronic HERV-W pseudoelement (5' region)
SLC16A10 intron 1
FOXP2 intron 3
NRCAM intron 2
Intronic solitary LTR
Gene harboring solitary LTR
ZNF 277 intron 1
ZNF277 exon 1~2
WDR72 intron 14
WDR72 exon 14~15
PIN4 exon 3~4
MBNL3 exon 1~2
C9orf85 intron 2
C9orf85 exon 2~3
UBD exon 1~2
GABBR1 exon 18~19
ERCC6L exon 1~2
AK095439 exon 2~3
Intergenic HERV-W proviral element and adjacent genes
Intergenic HERV-W pseudoelement and adjacent genes
To verify genomic locations and to link HERV-W elements and their corresponding assayed 3'-regions at the transcript level, forward primers inside 22 elements were designed (additional file 5: table S1). Following optimization, these primers in combination with corresponding reverse primers from quantitative assays located less than 2 kb 3' of corresponding HERV-W elements generated amplicons of expected sizes from human genomic DNA (data not shown). Following optimization, amplicons of expected sizes were also generated by most of 22 pairs using cDNA templates sourced from primary human cells or cell-lines (JEG-3 or CCF-STTG1). However, one assay still generated several bands whereas 3 assays produced no detectable product. These latter reactions covered the longest distances, i.e. 1.2 to 1.7 kb (data not shown).
Primers in assays for coding mRNAs were designed to detect exons flanking the introns with integrated HERV-W elements. Assay designs are illustrated in Figure 1B, and the sequences and positions of primers used for real-time PCRs are given in Table 2.
A commercially available Human MTC panel consisting of oligo-d(T)-primed cDNA from spleen, thymus, prostate, testis, ovary, intestine, colon and peripheral leukocytes was purchased from Clontech (Mountain View, CA, USA). These tissue cDNA were diluted 1/10 to reach a concentration of 0.1 ng/μl and then used as templates.
Cell culture and influenza A/WSN/33 virus infection in cells
Fibroblast cell cultures were established as previously described , The study was approved by the regional ethics committee (04-273/1; 2006/637-32). Cultures derived from one individual were inoculated with 0.5 multiples of infection of influenza A/WSN/33 virus, as previously described . Experiments were terminated after 24 hours by removal of supernatants and addition of lysis buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
RNA isolation and reverse transcription
RNA extraction and reverse transcription was carried out as previously described  using reagents from Qiagen. 500 ng of total RNA from each sample was treated with 1 U of DNase I (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) and subsequently used for first strand oligo-d(T) primed cDNA synthesis using Superscript II reagents (Invitrogen).
PCR and data analysis
PCR reactions were run on a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystem, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using 1× TITANIUM™Taq DNA polymerase mix (Clontech Laboratories Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) and 1 μl template from in 20 μl reactions. Amplicons were separated in 1% agarose gels, stained with GelRed (Gentaur, Brussels, Belgium) and visualized on a Chemi Doc system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
Real-time PCR reactions were run on an ABI Prism 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems) using Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix UDG (Invitrogen) with 0.25 μM of forward and reverse primers, and 1 μl cDNA template in triplicate 25 μl reactions. All assays consistently generated amplicons with a single melting temperature (i.e. a single peak on the derivative melting curve) as determined during an obligate post-amplification melting analysis. Efficiencies for all assays were comparable as determined from standard curves generated from amplifications of serial dilutions of a human cDNA pool (average efficiencies were 0.95 and 0.96 for the assays of HERV-W elements and adjacent genes, respectively). For some experiments, levels of transcript encoding β-actin were used as an endogenous control and these were quantified using the forward (5'-ATCCTAAAAGCCACCCCACT-3') and reverse (5'-CTCAAGTTGGGGGACAAAAA-3') primers.
Quantitative and qualitative analyses of HERV-W gag expression were performed as previously described .
Threshold cycle (Ct) values from the exponential phase of PCR amplification plots for each target transcript were exported to Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) for further calculations of averages or Δ Ct-values. For some experiments, Ct values were normalized to that encoding β-actin. From these values, fold-differences in the levels of transcripts among groups were calculated according to the formula 2 -ΔΔCt. The PRISM software (GraphPad 3.0, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for group-wise comparisons by Student's t-test, Chi-square, two-tail Fisher's exact test or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni-corrected multiple comparison post hoc tests where appropriate. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant.
This study was supported by the Swedish Brain Foundation, the Swedish Research Council (61X-20047) and the Stanley Medical Research Institute. We are grateful to Drs Anne-Sofie Johansson and Björn Owe-Larsson for providing the primary human fibroblast cultures.
- Ponting CP, Oliver PL, Reik W: Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2009, 136: 629-641. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bannert N, Kurth R: Retroelements and the human genome: new perspectives on an old relation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (Suppl 2): 14572-14579. 10.1073/pnas.0404838101.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Belshaw R, Katzourakis A, Paces J, Burt A, Tristem M: High Copy Number in Human Endogenous Retrovirus Families is Associated with Copying Mechanisms in Addition to Reinfection. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22: 814-817. 10.1093/molbev/msi088.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blond JL, Lavillette D, Cheynet V, Bouton O, Oriol G, Chapel-Fernandes S, Mandrand B, Mallet F, Cosset FL: An envelope glycoprotein of the human endogenous retrovirus HERV-W is expressed in the human placenta and fuses cells expressing the type D mammalian retrovirus receptor. J Virol. 2000, 74: 3321-3329. 10.1128/JVI.74.7.3321-3329.2000.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mi S, Lee X, Li X, Veldman GM, Finnerty H, Racie L, LaVallie E, Tang XY, Edouard P, Howes S, Keith JCJ, McCoy JM: Syncytin is a captive retroviral envelope protein involved in human placental morphogenesis. Nature. 2000, 403: 785-789. 10.1038/35001608.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Costas J: Characterization of the intragenomic spread of the human endogenous retrovirus family HERV-W. Mol Biol Evol. 2002, 19: 526-533.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pavlicek A, Paces J, Elleder D, Hejnar J: Processed pseudogenes of human endogenous retroviruses generated by LINEs: their integration, stability, and distribution. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 391-399.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schon U, Seifarth W, Baust C, Hohenadl C, Erfle V, Leib-Mosch C: Cell type-specific expression and promoter activity of human endogenous retroviral long terminal repeats. Virology. 2001, 279: 280-291. 10.1006/viro.2000.0712.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mallet F, Bouton O, Prudhomme S, Cheynet V, Oriol G, Bonnaud B, Lucotte G, Duret L, Mandrand B: The endogenous retroviral locus ERVWE1 is a bona fide gene involved in hominoid placental physiology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 1731-1736. 10.1073/pnas.0305763101.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nellaker C, Li F, Uhrzander F, Tyrcha J, Karlsson H: Expression profiling of repetitive elements by melting temperature analysis: variation in human tissues and individuals. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 532-10.1186/1471-2164-10-532.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laufer G, Mayer J, Mueller BF, Mueller-Lantzsch N, Ruprecht K: Analysis of transcribed human endogenous retrovirus W env loci clarifies the origin of multiple sclerosis-associated retrovirus env sequences. Retrovirology. 2009, 6: 37-10.1186/1742-4690-6-37.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nellaker C, Yao Y, Jones-Brando J, Mallet F, Yolken RH, Karlsson H: Transactivation of elements in the human endogenous retrovirus W family by viral infection. Retrovirology. 2006, 3: 44-10.1186/1742-4690-3-44.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yao Y, Schröder J, Nellåker C, Bottmer C, Bachmann S, Yolken RH, Karlsson H: Elevated levels of human endogenous retrovirus-W transcripts in blood cells from patients with first episode schizophrenia. Genes Brain Behav. 2007, 7: 103-112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Antony JM, van Marle G, Opii W, Butterfield DA, Mallet F, Yong VW, Wallace JL, Deacon RM, Warren K, Power C: Human endogenous retrovirus glycoprotein-mediated induction of redox reactants causes oligodendrocyte death and demyelination. Nat Neurosci. 2004, 7: 1088-1095. 10.1038/nn1319.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perron H, Lazarini F, Ruprecht K, Péchoux-Longin C, Seilhean D, Sazdovitch V, Créange A, Battail-Poirot N, Sibaï G, Santoro L, Jolivet M, Darlix J, Rieckmann P, Arzberger T, Hauw JJ, Lassmann H: Human endogenous retrovirus (HERV)-W ENV and GAG proteins: Physiological expression in human brain and pathophysiological modulation in multiple sclerosis lesions. J Neurovirol. 2005, 11: 23-33. 10.1080/13550280590901741.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frank O, Giehl M, Zheng C, Hehlmann R, Leib-Mosch C, Seifarth W: Human endogenous retrovirus expression profiles in samples from brains of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. J Virol. 2005, 79: 10890-10901. 10.1128/JVI.79.17.10890-10901.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karlsson H, Bachmann S, Schröder J, McArthur J, Torrey EF, Yolken RH: Retroviral RNA identified in the cerebrospinal fluids and brains of individuals with schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 4634-4639. 10.1073/pnas.061021998.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van de Lagemaat LN, Medstrand P, Mager DL: Multiple effects govern endogenous retrovirus survival patterns in human gene introns. Genome Biol. 2006, 7: R86-10.1186/gb-2006-7-9-r86.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nellaker C, Wallgren U, Karlsson H: Molecular beacon-based temperature control and automated analyses for improved resolution of melting temperature analysis using SYBR I green chemistry. Clin Chem. 58: 93-103.
- Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J, Devon K, Dewar K, Doyle M, FitzHugh W, et al: Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001, 409: 860-921. 10.1038/35057062.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, Smith HO, Yandell M, Evans CA, Holt RA, et al: The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001, 291: 1304-1351. 10.1126/science.1058040.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Forsman A, Yun Z, Hu L, Uzhameckis D, Jern P, Blomberg J: Development of broadly targeted human endogenous gammaretroviral pol-based real time PCRs Quantitation of RNA expression in human tissues. J Virol Methods. 2005, 129: 16-30. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.04.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johnson JM, Edwards S, Shoemaker D, Schadt EE: Dark matter in the genome: evidence of widespread transcription detected by microarray tiling experiments. Trends Genet. 2005, 21: 93-102. 10.1016/j.tig.2004.12.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Buzdin A, Kovalskaya-Alexandrova E, Gogvadze E, Sverdlov E: At least 50% of human-specific HERV-K (HML-2) long terminal repeats serve in vivo as active promoters for host nonrepetitive DNA transcription. J Virol. 2006, 80 (21): 10752-62. 10.1128/JVI.00871-06.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Bakel H, Nislow C, Blencowe BJ, Hughes TR: Most "dark matter" transcripts are associated with known genes. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8: e1000371-10.1371/journal.pbio.1000371.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gimenez J, Montgiraud C, Pichon JP, Bonnaud B, Arsac M, Ruel K, Bouton O, Mallet F: Custom human endogenous retroviruses dedicated microarray identifies self-induced HERV-W family elements reactivated in testicular cancer upon methylation control. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38: 2229-2246. 10.1093/nar/gkp1214.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spitz F, Duboule D: Global control regions and regulatory landscapes in vertebrate development and evolution. Adv Genet. 2008, 61: 175-205. full_text.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feinberg AP: Methylation meets genomics. Nat Genet. 2001, 27: 9-10. 10.1038/83825.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ladd-Acosta C, Pevsner J, Sabunciyan S, Yolken RH, Webster MJ, Dinkins T, Callinan PA, Fan JB, Potash JB, Feinberg AP: DNA methylation signatures within the human brain. Am J Hum Genet. 2007, 81: 1304-1315. 10.1086/524110.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reiss D, Zhang Y, Mager DL: Widely variable endogenous retroviral methylation levels in human placenta. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: 4743-4754. 10.1093/nar/gkm455.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matouskova M, Blazkova J, Pajer P, Pavlicek A, Hejnar J: CpG methylation suppresses transcriptional activity of human syncytin-1 in non-placental tissues. Exp Cell Res. 2006, 312: 1011-1020. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.12.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths DJ: Endogenous retroviruses in the human genome sequence. Genome Biol. 2001, 2: REVIEWS1017-10.1186/gb-2001-2-6-reviews1017.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khodosevich K, Lebedev Y, Sverdlov E: Endogenous retroviruses and human evolution. Comp Funct Genomics. 2002, 3: 494-498. 10.1002/cfg.216.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Conley AB, Piriyapongsa J, Jordan IK: Retroviral promoters in the human genome. Bioinformatics. 2008, 24: 1563-1567. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn243.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kent WJ: BLAT--the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 656-664.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jurka J: Repbase update: a database and an electronic journal of repetitive elements. Trends Genet. 2000, 16: 418-420. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02093-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR: NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, D501-504. 33 Database
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Method. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.