Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in bovine placentas
© Su et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 17 June 2013
Accepted: 11 December 2013
Published: 8 January 2014
DNA methylation is an important epigenetic modification that is essential for epigenetic gene regulation in development and disease. To date, the genome-wide DNA methylation maps of many organisms have been reported, but the methylation pattern of cattle remains unknown.
We showed the genome-wide DNA methylation map in placental tissues using methylated DNA immunoprecipitation combined with high-throughput sequencing (MeDIP-seq). In cattle, the methylation levels in the gene body are relatively high, whereas the promoter remains hypomethylated. We obtained thousands of highly methylated regions (HMRs), methylated CpG islands, and methylated genes from bovine placenta. DNA methylation levels around the transcription start sites of genes are negatively correlated with the gene expression level. However, the relationship between gene-body DNA methylation and gene expression is non-monotonic. Moderately expressed genes generally have the highest levels of gene-body DNA methylation, whereas the highly, and lowly expressed genes, as well as silent genes, show moderate DNA methylation levels. Genes with the highest expression show the lowest DNA methylation levels.
We have generated the genome-wide mapping of DNA methylation in cattle for the first time, and our results can be used for future studies on epigenetic gene regulation in cattle. This study contributes to the knowledge on epigenetics in cattle.
DNA methylation, a major epigenetic modification of the genome found in most eukaryotes, is essential for normal development and crucial in many biological processes, such as gene expression regulation, genomic imprinting, X-chromosome inactivation, suppression of repetitive elements, and carcinogenesis. DNA methylation preferentially occurs at the 5′ position of cytosine in CpG dinucleotides, which are mostly found in clusters known as CpG islands (CGIs) . DNA methylation in the promoter or the first exon of a gene  generally leads to transcriptional silencing . Profiling DNA methylation maps across the genome is important to understand DNA methylation changes that occur during development and in disease phenotypes. The genome-wide DNA methylation maps of many organisms, such as human , chicken [5, 6], rat , Arabidopsis, rice , and silkworm  has been reported. However, the methylation pattern of cattle remains unknown.
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) (i.e., somatic cloning) is a promising technology with numerous potential applications, including reproduction of high-value domestic or endangered mammalians, biomedical research, human xenotransplantation, transgenic research, disease models, and therapeutic cloning. However, low cloning efficiency and a high incidence of developmental abnormalities in SCNT clones markedly hinder the use of this technology. Developmental abnormalities include the large offspring syndrome, respiratory problems, placental deficiency, obesity, prolonged gestation, short life span, fetal edema, dystocia, hydramnios, and perinatal death [11–13]. The developmental abnormalities in SCNT clones usually involve the placenta; the placenta is central to the onset of pathologies [11, 14–22], and most cloned fetuses die in utero because of placental deficiency . We also found that placental weight and mean placentome weight were high, but the number of placentomes was low, in deceased cloned calves compared with calves produced by normal sexual reproduction . The expression and DNA methylation levels of several imprinted genes were also aberrant in the placenta of deceased cloned calves . Gene expression analyses of the placenta of cloned calves show that multiple pathways are affected [24, 25]. Placental abnormality may be the main cause of fetal death in clones. The principal cause of the developmental abnormalities of the fetus and placenta in cloned animals is aberrant epigenetic nuclear reprogramming of the donor somatic cell, which involves various epigenetic modifications. DNA methylation is a major epigenetic modification of the genome and is crucial in nuclear reprogramming during SCNT.
In this study, we analyzed the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern in the placentas of cattle with the use of methylated DNA immunoprecipitation combined with high-throughput sequencing (MeDIP-seq) by Illumina Genome Analyzer II. The DNA methylome distribution in the bovine genome was shown for the first time. Two placental tissues were used in this study, namely, the placental tissues of deceased cloned calves (SCNT) and normally produced calves (control).
Global mapping of DNA methylation in cattle
Data generated by MeDIP-seq
Total mapped reads
Total unique mapped reads
Percentage of mapped
Percentage of unique mapped
reads in total reads
reads in mapped reads
The read distribution on different genome regions represents the features of genome-wide methylation pattern. Analysis of the read distribution in different components of the genome showed that uniquely mapped reads were mainly present (approximately 27%) in intron regions (Additional file 3). The proportion of reads distinctly mapped to CGIs in the SCNT and control placentas was only 1.64% and 2.42%, respectively (Additional file 3). Many CpG islands were located in repetitive elements.
DNA methylation profile in bovine genes
Distribution of highly methylated regions
Information for HMRs
HMR mean length
HMR total length
HMR covered size in genome (%)
CpG islands in bovine placenta
Genomic distribution of methylated CpG islands
Total methylatied CGIs
Upstream 2 k
Downstream 2 k
Methylated genes in bovine placenta
Methylated genes were defined in this study as genes overlapping (≥ 50%) with HMRs in the promoter or gene-body regions. A total of 7,974 methylated genes were found in the SCNT placenta, among which 302 genes were methylated only in promoters, 6,845 only in gene bodies, and 872 in both promoters and gene bodies (Additional file 11). A total of 8,466 methylated genes were found in the control placenta, among which 315 genes were methylated only in promoters, 7,212 only in gene bodies, and 939 in both promoters and gene bodies (Additional file 12).
MeDIP-seq data validation by bisulfite sequencing
We conducted bisulfite sequencing for nine selected gene regions on each unpooled samples. There were three individual samples in SCNT and control groups, respectively. The DNA methylation status of nine gene regions between SCNT and control groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and LSD tests using the SPSS 16.0 software. In MeDIP-seq results (Additional files 11 and 12), upstream 2 k (promoter) of IGF2 (NM_174087), TCF7 (NM_001099186), and UBE2S (NM_001076472) were methylated in the control placentas, but unmethylated in SCNT placentas. Upstream 2 k of SENP1 (NM_001206876), ZNF3 (NM_001046614), USP10 (NM_001098924), and CD44 (NM_174013) were methylated in SCNT placentas, but unmethylated in control placentas. CPT1B (NM_001034349), not expressed in placenta, was hypermethylated in both SCNT and control placentas. The bisulfite sequencing results of the eight aforementioned gene regions were in accordance with the MeDIP-seq results (Additional file 13). The upstream 2 k of HSP90AA1 (NM_001012670) was methylated in both SCNT and control placentas in MeDIP-seq results, contrary to the bisulfite sequencing results, which showed that the region was unmethylated in SCNT placentas. These validations were almost in accordance with the MeDIP-seq results (except one gene region in one sample), indicating the reliability of our methylation data obtained by MeDIP-seq.
DNA methylation and gene expression level
However, the relationship between gene-body DNA methylation and expression levels shows a non-monotonic correlation (Figure 4). Moderately expressed genes generally have the highest levels of gene-body methylation, whereas the highly and lowly expressed genes, as well as the silent genes, show moderate DNA methylation levels. The housekeeping genes show the lowest DNA methylation levels.
In the downstream 2 kb regions of TSS, the silent genes and housekeeping genes show low DNA methylation levels, whereas moderately expressed genes also have the highest levels of gene-body methylation.
Online data deposition
The MeDIP-seq and RNA-seq data from this study have been deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Archive with accession numbers SRP032370 and SRP033225, respectively, (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/).
Over the past decade, multiple methods have been developed and applied to analyze genome-wide DNA methylation profile, including MeDIP-seq, whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS). WGBS is an excellent approach to determine the DNA methylome. The DNA methylome uses sodium bisulfite to convert unmethylated cytosine nucleotides to uracils and leaves methylated cytosines unmodified, which can be subsequently distinguished by sequencing. WGBS has high resolution, but it is costly, time consuming, involves complex data, and lacks comprehensive analytical tools, which considerably limit its popularity and applicability . In MeDIP-seq, anti-5-methylcytosine antibody was first used to specifically recognize methylated cytosines, and the methylated DNA fragments were subsequently enriched. MeDIP-seq is a suitable method to analyze the DNA methylation status of heavily methylated genome regions. Many recent studies have shown that MeDIP-seq can reflect the relative genome-wide DNA methylation profile [5, 6, 27]. Therefore, we selected MeDIP-seq to analyze genome-wide profiles of DNA methylation in cattle in this study. However, MeDIP-seq technology is dependent on high sequence dependence. Thus, only regions of relatively high CpG abundance are obtained, and many genes with spaced CpG sites may not be detected. The methylation status of sequences where CpG sites are spaced (e.g., only one may occur in any given fragment) may appear unmethylated even if the few CpG sites present are actually methylated. Therefore, this method is no longer the technology of choice.
Genome-wide DNA methylation maps of many organisms have been reported, but the methylation pattern of cattle remains unknown. In this study, we report for the first time the genome-wide profiles of DNA methylation in the placentas of cattle. Cattle show analogous DNA methylation profiles to those of mammals and plants [4–6, 8–10]. In cattle, the DNA methylation level sharply decreased before the TSS, dramatically increased towards the 3′ direction, and stayed at a plateau until the 3′ end of the gene body.
In bovine placentas, the methylation levels in the gene body are relatively high, whereas the promoter (around TSSs) remains hypomethylated, a finding that is consistent in human  and chicken . Most of the promoter regions were hypomethylated, and DNA methylation in the promoter repressed gene expression [29, 30]. Laurent et al. investigated the correlation of methylation profile with the expression level in human embryonic stem cells and found that the 20% of most highly expressed genes exhibited the lowest methylation levels at ±1 kb from the TSSs. The methylation levels increased. We also analyzed the relationship between DNA methylation and expression levels with decreasing gene expression. Consistent with previous reports in humans [28, 31, 32] and chicken , DNA methylation levels around TSSs at the 5′ ends of genes are negatively correlated with the gene expression level, a finding indicating that promoter methylation is a repressive epigenetic mark that downregulates gene expression. DNA methylation within gene bodies is more prevalent than in promoters, but information on the role of DNA methylation in gene bodies is insufficient. Gene-body methylation and expression levels apparently have a complex relationship. Gene-body DNA methylation is positively correlated with gene expression in humans [28, 31, 33–35]. However, the relationship between gene-body DNA methylation and gene expression levels is not monotonic but rather bell-shaped in plants, invertebrates, and even in humans; moderately expressed genes have the highest methylation levels [32, 36, 37]. In bovine placentas, moderately expressed genes have the highest degree of gene-body DNA methylation.
Aberrant epigenetic nuclear reprogramming during SCNT causes low cloning efficiency and developmental abnormalities in cloned animals. DNA methylation is a major epigenetic modification of the genome, and many studies have shown that abnormal DNA methylation reprogramming is found in cloned embryos and fetuses [11, 22, 38–41]. Chan et al. investigated genome-scale DNA methylation patterns of SCNT-reconstructed mouse embryos using RRBS for the first time and found that epigenetic reprogramming after nuclear transfer in SCNT mouse embryos does not fully recapitulate the natural DNA demethylation events that occur at fertilization, which results in aberrant methylation at some promoters and repetitive elements that may contribute to developmental failure . Bovine SCNT blastocysts bear significantly higher methylation levels than in vitro-fertilized embryos at satellite I sequence . In addition, the DNA methylation levels of several imprinted genes were found aberrant in various tissues of deceased SCNT calves [22, 40]. However, the genome-wide analysis of aberrant methylation in cloned animals has not been reported. In the present study, we screened out potentially aberrant methylated genes in the placentas of deceased cloned calves, which may have caused developmental abnormalities and ultimately resulted in the death of the cloned cattle. For example, IGF2 was found hypomethylated in placentas of deceased SCNT calves but hypermethylated in those of normal calves in this study. The placenta-specific paternally expressed imprinted gene IGF2, which is a major modulator of placental and fetal growth , acts in the placenta to directly control the supply of maternal nutrients to the fetus. IGF2 was overexpressed in cloned bovine embryos  and various tissues of deceased cloned calves [22, 40]. Yang and colleagues also found that IGF2 was drastically over-expressed in the bladder, brain, heart, and lung of cloned calves suffering from the large offspring syndrome compared with normal controls . IGF2 expression was also aberrantly upregulated in the heart tissues of deceased cloned calves, and IGF2 showed aberrant DNA methylation levels in the kidneys of deceased cloned calves . In humans, IGF2 upregulation is important in the pathogenesis of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) [45–47], which is characterized by somatic overgrowth that is similar to the large offspring syndrome in ruminants. Based on these results, we inferred that hypomethylated IGF2 and the upregulated IGF2 expression may promote overall fetal growth, and thus can be related to the large offspring syndrome and death of cloned animals.
For the first time, we have completed the genome-wide mapping of DNA methylation in bovine placentas. This mapping can be used as a basis for further studies on epigenetic gene regulation in cattle and other ruminants.
In this study, we have generated the genome-wide mapping of DNA methylation in cattle for the first time, and our results can be used for future studies on epigenetic gene regulation in cattle. This study contributes to the knowledge on epigenetics in cattle.
The entire experimental procedure was approved and supervised by the Animal Care Commission of the College of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University Shaanxi, China. The bovine ovaries used in this study were purchased from Tumen abattoir and Zhongle abattoir, two local slaughterhouses located in Xi’An, China. A 40-day-old female Holstein fetus was obtained for nuclear donor cell cultures, and Angus cows were used as recipients (Yangling Keyuan Cloning Co. Ltd).
All chemicals and reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA), unless specifically stated otherwise. Disposable, sterile plasticware was obtained from Nunclon (Roskilde, Denmark).
Production of cloned calves and tissue collection
The production of cloned calves, including nuclear donor cell preparation, oocyte collection, and in vitro maturation, somatic cell nuclear transfer, activation, fusion, culture of cloned embryos, embryo transfer, and pregnancy diagnosis, were performed as previously described [48, 49]. Before SCNT, nuclear donor cells, which were established from the skin of the Holstein fetus, were cultured in serum-starved medium (0.5% fetal bovine serum, FBS) for 2 d. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) were matured in vitro for 20 h in bicarbonate-buffered tissue culture medium 199 (TCM-199, Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 1 μg/mL 17 β-estradiol, and 0.075 IU/mL human menopausal gonadotropin. Oocytes with an extruded first polar body were selected and stained with 10 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 for 10 min prior to enucleation. A 20 μm inner diameter glass pipette was used to aspirate the first polar body and a small amount of surrounding cytoplasm. The expelled cytoplasm was surveyed under ultraviolet radiation to confirm the removal of nuclear material. With the use of the 20 μm inner diameter glass pipette, a single disaggregated donor cell was transferred to the pre-vitelline space of the enucleated oocytes. Oocyte-cell fusion was performed by a double electrical pulse of 35 V for 10 μs using a pair of platinum electrodes connected to a micromanipulator in microdrops of Zimmermann’s fusion medium. The reconstructed cloned bovine embryos were activated in 5 μM ionomycin for 4 min, followed by treatment with 1.9 mM dimethynopyridine in synthetic oviductal fluid supplemented with amino acids and bovine serum albumin for 3 h to 4 h. The activated embryos were cultured in G1.5/G2.5 sequential media (Vitrolife AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 38.5°C. Fresh day 7 cloned blastocysts were non-surgically transferred (one embryo per recipient) to the synchronized recipient uterine horn ipsilateral to the corpus luteum 7 d after standing estrus. Eight cloned calves were delivered via C-section from days 286 to 290. Two cloned calves were stillborn, and the others died within 2 d after birth. The deceased calves suffered from placental abnormalities, including placental hypertrophy and a larger placentome, but a small number of placentomes were observed. We randomly selected placental tissues of three deceased cloned calves (SCNT samples) and three female Holstein calves produced by normal sexual reproduction (control samples) to perform genome-wide DNA methylation and RNA-seq analyses. After the birth of the calves, the fetal contributions of the placentas were immediately collected, rinsed thrice with RNA-free ddH2O and minced into pieces. The tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at -80°C until DNA and RNA extractions.
DNA extraction and preparation for MeDIP-seq
Genomic DNA was extracted from the placentas with the use of a TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China), and DNA quality was evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometer. Additional file 16 shows the preparation for MeDIP-seq. Genomic DNA isolated from the placentas of three randomly chosen deceased cloned calves (SCNT) were mixed in equal amounts to generate a pooled sample as SCNT. Genomic DNA isolated from the placentas of three female Holstein calves produced by normal sexual reproduction (control) were mixed in equal amounts to generate a pooled sample as control. In detail, DNA from each placenta was measured with Fluoroskan Ascent (Thermo Labsystems, Franklin, MA) and Picogreen reagents and kits (Molecular Probes, P-7589). The selected DNAs were diluted to a standard concentration. To ensure that the same amount of each DNA sample was transferred to the pool, Hamilton ML2200 and Vivace automated pipetting stations were used to transfer each DNA sample into a single tube. Then, the pool sample was gently mixed and requantified before further dilution to a working concentration. Subsequently, these two pooled samples were sonicated to produce 100 bp to 500 bp DNA fragments. After DNA underwent end repairing, phosphorylating, and A-tailing with Paired-End DNA Sample Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), it was ligated to Illumina sequencing primer adaptors. Double-stranded DNA was then denatured and immunoprecipitated by anti-5-methylcytosine mouse monoclonal antibody (Calbiochem). The following procedure was the same as in the method described by Hu . Briefly, after 220 bp to 320 bp bands were excised from the gel and purified, the products were quantified on Agilent 2100 Analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and qPCR qualification, and DNA libraries were sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq 2000 (Illumina) by the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI, Shenzhen, China).
Bioinformatic analysis was conducted according to a previously described protocol . After the low-quality reads and those containing adapter reads were filtered, the MeDIP-seq data from Illumina sequencing were aligned to the UCSC cattle reference genome  (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/bosTau6/bigZips/bosTau6.fa.gz) with SOAPaligner v 2.21 (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/) with no more than 2 bp mismatches. We analyzed the genome coverage of the CG, CHG, and CHH sites under different sequencing depths, distributions of MeDIP-Seq reads in different CG density regions, and the read distribution analysis including the distribution in cattle chromosomes and in the different genome components. The region from TSS to transcript end site was defined as the gene body region. The DNA methylation profile in the gene region was calculated by the reads that were aligned to a unique locus the genome.
Genome-wide highly methylated region (methylation peak, regions with sequencing tags more than 20, and a p value < 1 x 10−5) scanning was conducted with MACS V 1.4.2 (http://liulab.dfci.harvard.edu/MACS/) . The distribution of CpG in HMRs and the HMR distribution in the different components of the cattle genome (upstream 2 kb, 5′ UTR, CDS, intron, 3′ UTR, downstream 2 kb) were analyzed in our study.
CpGPlot (https://gcg.gwdg.de/emboss/cpgplot.html) was used to scan CpG islands (CGIs) with the following criteria: length > 200 bp, GC content > 50%, and observed-to-expected CpG ratio > 0.6. CpG islands that overlapped with the HMRs were considered methylated. Genes that overlapped with the HMRs in promoter or gene body regions were considered methylated genes.
Bisulfite sequencing PCR analysis
Nine gene regions were chosen to validate MeDIP-seq data with bisulfite PCR using unpooled individual samples. There were three individual samples in SCNT and control groups, respectively. First, with the use of the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold™ Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA, USA), the individual DNA samples were subjected to sodium bisulfite treatment as previously described . After 20 μL DNA sample (500 ng to 900 ng) were added to the 130 μL CT Conversion Reagent in a PCR tube, the sample tubes were placed in a thermal cycle for 10 min at 95°C for DNA denaturation and 2.5 h at 64°C for bisulfite conversion. Modified DNA was desalted, purified, and finally eluted with 15 μL elution buffer. Subsequently, bisulfite sequencing PCR (BS-PCR) was immediately performed with a 2 μL modified DNA per PCR run. CPT1B in 5′ terminal region (4 kb) and upstream 2 kb of IGF2, TCF7, HSP90AA1, UBE2S, SENP1, ZNF3, USP10, and CD44 were analyzed by MethPrimer software to predict the CpG islands . The specific primers for BS-PCR were designed with MethPrimer software and Methyl Primer Express® Software v1.0 (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) (Additional file 17). The Hot Start DNA polymerase Zymo Taq premix (Zymo Research) was used in BS-PCR. BS-PCR was performed in 50 μL reaction mixtures that contain 25 μL Zymo Taq premix, 2 μL modified DNA, 21 μL dH2O and 1 μL of both forward and reverse primers with the following program: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at different temperatures (Additional file 17) for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. PCR products were gel-purified with TIANgel Midi Purification Kit (Tiangen). Purified fragments were subcloned into pMD20-T vectors (TaKaRa). For each individual sample, about 10 clones were selected for DNA sequencing (BGI). BIQ Analyzer software  was used to analyze bisulfite sequencing data and C–T conversion rates. Methylation data from bisulfite sequencing were analyzed by computation of the percentage of methylated CpGs of the total number of CpGs. The DNA methylation status of nine gene regions were compared between SCNT and control groups. Outcomes were tested by one-way ANOVA and LSD tests using the SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
where RPKM(A) is considered as the expression of gene A, C is the number of reads that uniquely aligned to gene A, N is the total number of reads that uniquely aligned to all genes, and L is the number of bases in gene A.
The authors thank Mr. Ruizhe Li for his generous technical assistance. This work was supported by the National Major Project for Production of Transgenic Breeding (No. 2013ZX08007-004) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2011AA100303).
- Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M: CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol. 1987, 196 (2): 261-282. 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90689-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larsen F, Gundersen G, Lopez R, Prydz H: Cpg Islands as gene markers in the human genome. Genomics. 1992, 13 (4): 1095-1107. 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90024-M.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plass C, Soloway PD: DNA methylation, imprinting and cancer. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002, 10 (1): 6-16. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200768.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weber M, Davies JJ, Wittig D, Oakeley EJ, Haase M, Lam WL, Schuebeler D: Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat Genet. 2005, 37 (8): 853-862. 10.1038/ng1598.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li Q, Li N, Hu X, Li J, Du Z, Chen L, Yin G, Duan J, Zhang H, Zhao Y: Genome-wide mapping of DNA methylation in chicken. Plos One. 2011, 6 (5): e19428-10.1371/journal.pone.0019428.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu Y, Xu H, Li Z, Zheng X, Jia X, Nie Q, Zhang X: Comparison of the genome-wide DNA methylation profiles between fast-growing and slow-growing broilers. Plos One. 2013, 8 (2): e56411-10.1371/journal.pone.0056411.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sati S, Tanwar VS, Kumar KA, Patowary A, Jain V, Ghosh S, Ahmad S, Singh M, Reddy SU, Chandak GR: High resolution methylome map of rat indicates role of intragenic DNA methylation in identification of coding region. Plos One. 2012, 7 (2): e31621-10.1371/journal.pone.0031621.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang X, Yazaki J, Sundaresan A, Cokus S, Chan SW-L, Chen H, Henderson IR, Shinn P, Pellegrini M, Jacobsen SE: Genome-wide high-resolution mapping and functional analysis of DNA methylation in arabidopsis. Cell. 2006, 126 (6): 1189-1201. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan H, Kikuchi S, Neumann P, Zhang W, Wu Y, Chen F, Jiang J: Genome-wide mapping of cytosine methylation revealed dynamic DNA methylation patterns associated with genes and centromeres in rice. Plant J. 2010, 63 (3): 353-365. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04246.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiang H, Zhu J, Chen Q, Dai F, Li X, Li M, Zhang H, Zhang G, Li D, Dong Y: Single base-resolution methylome of the silkworm reveals a sparse epigenomic map. Nat Biotechnol. 2010, 28 (5): 516-520. 10.1038/nbt.1626.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang XZ, Smith SL, Tian XC, Lewin HA, Renard JP, Wakayama T: Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos and its implications for therapeutic cloning. Nat Genet. 2007, 39 (3): 295-302. 10.1038/ng1973.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Young LE, Sinclair KD, Wilmut I: Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep. Rev Reprod. 1998, 3 (3): 155-163. 10.1530/ror.0.0030155.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Farin PW, Piedrahita JA, Farin CE: Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 2006, 65 (1): 178-191. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.022.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chavatte-Palmer P, Heyman Y, Richard C, Monget P, LeBourhis D, Kann G, Chilliard Y, Vignon X, Renard JP: Clinical, hormonal, and hematologic characteristics of bovine calves derived from nuclei from somatic cells. Biol Reprod. 2002, 66 (6): 1596-1603. 10.1095/biolreprod66.6.1596.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Constant F, Guillomot M, Heyman Y, Vignon X, Laigre P, Servely JL, Renard JP, Chavatte-Palmer P: Large offspring or large placenta syndrome? Morphometric analysis of late gestation bovine placentomes from somatic nuclear transfer pregnancies complicated by hydrallantois. Biol Reprod. 2006, 75 (1): 122-130. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.051581.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miglino MA, Pereira FTV, Visintin JA, Garcia JM, Meirelles FV, Rumpf R, Ambrosio CE, Papa PC, Santos TC, Carvalho AF, et al: Placentation in cloned cattle: structure and microvascular architecture. Theriogenology. 2007, 68 (4): 604-617. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.060.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suemizu H, Aiba K, Yoshikawa T, Sharov AA, Shimozawa N, Tamaoki N, Ko MS: Expression profiling of placentomegaly associated with nuclear transplantation of mouse ES cells. Dev Biol. 2003, 253 (1): 36-53. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0870.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogawa H, Ono Y, Shimozawa N, Sotomaru Y, Katsuzawa Y, Hiura H, Ito M, Kono T: Disruption of imprinting in cloned mouse fetuses from embryonic stem cells. Reproduction. 2003, 126 (4): 549-557. 10.1530/rep.0.1260549.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bischoff SR, Tsai S, Hardison N, Motsinger-Reif AA, Freking BA, Nonneman D, Rohrer G, Piedrahita JA: Characterization of conserved and nonconserved imprinted genes in swine. Biol Reprod. 2009, 81 (5): 906-920. 10.1095/biolreprod.109.078139.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Sousa PA, King T, Harkness L, Young LE, Walker SK, Wilmut I: Evaluation of gestational deficiencies in cloned sheep fetuses and placentae. Biol Reprod. 2001, 65 (1): 23-30. 10.1095/biolreprod65.1.23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong Y, Yang J, Chi Y, Wang W, Wu W, Yun X, Kong X, Gu J: BCL2L12A localizes to the cell nucleus and induces growth inhibition through G2/M arrest in CHO cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2010, 333 (1): 323-330.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Su JM, Yang B, Wang YS, Li YY, Xiong XR, Wang LJ, Guo ZK, Zhang Y: Expression and methylation status of imprinted genes in placentas of deceased and live cloned transgenic calves. Theriogenology. 2011, 75 (7): 1346-1359. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.11.045.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnold DR, Fortier AL, Lefebvre R, Miglino MA, Pfarrer C, Smith LC: Placental insufficiencies in cloned animals - a workshop report. Placenta. 2008, 29 (Suppl A): S108-S110.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith SL, Everts RE, Tian XC, Du FL, Sung LY, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Jeong BS, Renard JP, Lewin HA, Yang XZ: Global gene expression profiles reveal significant nuclear reprogramming by the blastocyst stage after cloning. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102 (49): 17582-17587. 10.1073/pnas.0508952102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Everts RE, Chavatte-Palmer P, Razzak A, Hue I, Green CA, Oliveira R, Vignon X, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Tian XC, Yang XZ, et al: Aberrant gene expression patterns in placentomes are associated with phenotypically normal and abnormal cattle cloned by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Physiol Genomics. 2008, 33 (1): 65-77. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00223.2007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laird PW: Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet. 2010, 11 (3): 191-203. 10.1038/nrg2732.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruike Y, Imanaka Y, Sato F, Shimizu K, Tsujimoto G: Genome-wide analysis of aberrant methylation in human breast cancer cells using methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation combined with high-throughput sequencing. Bmc Genomics. 2010, 11 (1): 137-10.1186/1471-2164-11-137.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ball MP, Li JB, Gao Y, Lee J-H, LeProust EM, Park I-H, Xie B, Daley GQ, Church GM: Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2009, 27 (4): 361-368. 10.1038/nbt.1533.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li M, Wu H, Luo Z, Xia Y, Guan J, Wang T, Gu Y, Chen L, Zhang K, Ma J: An atlas of DNA methylomes in porcine adipose and muscle tissues. Nature communications. 2012, 3: 850-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klose RJ, Bird AP: Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends Biochem Sci. 2006, 31 (2): 89-97. 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.12.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laurent L, Wong E, Li G, Huynh T, Tsirigos A, Ong CT, Low HM, Sung KWK, Rigoutsos I, Loring J: Dynamic changes in the human methylome during differentiation. Genome Res. 2010, 20 (3): 320-331. 10.1101/gr.101907.109.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jjingo D, Conley AB, Soojin VY, Lunyak VV, Jordan IK: On the presence and role of human gene-body DNA methylation. Oncotarget. 2012, 3 (4): 462-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aran D, Toperoff G, Rosenberg M, Hellman A: Replication timing-related and gene body-specific methylation of active human genes. Hum Mol Genet. 2011, 20 (4): 670-680. 10.1093/hmg/ddq513.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH, Hawkins RD, Hon G, Tonti-Filippini J, Nery JR, Lee L, Ye Z, Ngo Q-M: Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature. 2009, 462 (7271): 315-322. 10.1038/nature08514.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rauch TA, Wu X, Zhong X, Riggs AD, Pfeifer GP: A human B cell methylome at 100− base pair resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009, 106 (3): 671-678. 10.1073/pnas.0812399106.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zemach A, McDaniel IE, Silva P, Zilberman D: Genome-wide evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic DNA methylation. Science. 2010, 328 (5980): 916-919. 10.1126/science.1186366.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zilberman D, Gehring M, Tran RK, Ballinger T, Henikoff S: Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription. Nat Genet. 2006, 39 (1): 61-69.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chan MM, Smith ZD, Egli D, Regev A, Meissner A: Mouse ooplasm confers context-specific reprogramming capacity. Nat Genet. 2012, 44 (9): 978-980. 10.1038/ng.2382.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deshmukh RS, Østrup O, Østrup E, Vejlsted M, Niemann H, Lucas-Hahn A, Petersen B, Li J, Callesen H, Hyttel P: DNA methylation in porcine preimplantation embryos developed in vivo and produced by in vitro fertilization, parthenogenetic activation and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Epigenetics. 2011, 6 (2): 177-187. 10.4161/epi.6.2.13519.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Su J, Wang Y, Liu Q, Yang B, Wu Y, Luo Y, Hu G, Zhang Y: Aberrant mRNA expression and DNA methylation levels of imprinted genes in cloned transgenic calves that died of large offspring syndrome. Livest Sci. 2011, 141 (1): 24-35. 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.04.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sibley CP, Coan PM, Ferguson-Smith AC, Dean W, Hughes J, Smith P, Reik W, Burton GJ, Fowden AL, Constancia M: Placental-specific insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) regulates the diffusional exchange characteristics of the mouse placenta. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (21): 8204-8208. 10.1073/pnas.0402508101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Han DW, Song SJ, Uhum SJ, Do JT, Kim NH, Chung KS, Lee HT: Expression of IGF2 and IGF receptor mRNA in bovine nuclear transferred embryos. Zygote. 2003, 11 (3): 245-252. 10.1017/S0967199403002296.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang L, Chavatte-Palmer P, Kubota C, O’Neill M, Hoagland T, Renard JP, Taneja M, Yang XZ, Tian XC: Expression of imprinted genes is aberrant in deceased newborn cloned calves and relatively normal in surviving adult clones. Mol Reprod Dev. 2005, 71 (4): 431-438. 10.1002/mrd.20311.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin L, Li Q, Zhang L, Zhao DS, Dai YP, Li N: Aberrant epigenetic changes and gene expression in cloned cattle dying around birth. Bmc Dev Biol. 2008, 8: 14-10.1186/1471-213X-8-14.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Joyce JA, Lam WK, Catchpoole DJ, Jenks P, Reik W, Maher ER, Schofield PN: Imprinting of IGF2 and H19: lack of reciprocity in sporadic Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1997, 6 (9): 1543-1548. 10.1093/hmg/6.9.1543.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reik W, Bowden L, Constancia M, Dean W, Feil R, Forne T, Kelsey G, Maher E, Moore T, Sun FL, et al: Regulation of Igf2 imprinting in development and disease. Int J Dev Biol. 1996, Suppl 1: 53S-54S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun FL, Dean WL, Kelsey G, Allen ND, Reik W: Transactivation of Igf2 in a mouse model of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Nature. 1997, 389 (6653): 809-815. 10.1038/39797.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Su J, Wang Y, Li Y, Li R, Li Q, Wu Y, Quan F, Liu J, Guo Z, Zhang Y: Oxamflatin significantly improves nuclear reprogramming, blastocyst quality, and in vitro development of bovine SCNT embryos. Plos One. 2011, 6 (8): e23805-10.1371/journal.pone.0023805.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Su J, Wang Y, Li R, Peng H, Hua S, Li Q, Quan F, Guo Z, Zhang Y: Oocytes selected using BCB staining enhance nuclear reprogramming and the in vivo development of SCNT embryos in cattle. Plos One. 2012, 7 (4): e36181-10.1371/journal.pone.0036181.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elsik CG, Tellam RL, Worley KC: The genome sequence of taurine cattle: a window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science. 2009, 324 (5926): 522-528.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sundarbose K, Kartha RV, Subramanian S: MicroRNAs as biomarkers in cancer. Diagnostics. 2013, 3 (1): 84-104. 10.3390/diagnostics3010084.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li LC, Dahiya R: MethPrimer: designing primers for methylation PCRs. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18 (11): 1427-1431. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1427.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bock C, Reither S, Mikeska T, Paulsen M, Walter J, Lengauer T: BiQ analyzer: visualization and quality control for DNA methylation data from bisulfite sequencing. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (21): 4067-4068. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti652.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.