Open Access

Characterisation of novel microRNAs in the Black flying fox (Pteropus alecto) by deep sequencing

  • Christopher Cowled1Email author,
  • Cameron R Stewart1,
  • Vladimir A Likic2,
  • Marc R Friedländer3,
  • Mary Tachedjian1,
  • Kristie A Jenkins1,
  • Mark L Tizard1,
  • Pauline Cottee1,
  • Glenn A Marsh1,
  • Peng Zhou1,
  • Michelle L Baker1,
  • Andrew G Bean1 and
  • Lin-fa Wang1, 4
BMC Genomics201415:682

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-682

Received: 18 December 2013

Accepted: 7 August 2014

Published: 15 August 2014

Abstract

Background

Bats are a major source of new and emerging viral diseases. Despite the fact that bats carry and shed highly pathogenic viruses including Ebola, Nipah and SARS, they rarely display clinical symptoms of infection. Host factors influencing viral replication are poorly understood in bats and are likely to include both pre- and post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. MicroRNAs are a major mechanism of post-transcriptional gene regulation, however very little is known about them in bats.

Results

This study describes 399 microRNAs identified by deep sequencing of small RNA isolated from tissues of the Black flying fox, Pteropus alecto, a confirmed natural reservoir of the human pathogens Hendra virus and Australian bat lyssavirus. Of the microRNAs identified, more than 100 are unique amongst vertebrates, including a subset containing mutations in critical seed regions. Clusters of rapidly-evolving microRNAs were identified, as well as microRNAs predicted to target genes involved in antiviral immunity, the DNA damage response, apoptosis and autophagy. Closer inspection of the predicted targets for several highly supported novel miRNA candidates suggests putative roles in host-virus interaction.

Conclusions

MicroRNAs are likely to play major roles in regulating virus-host interaction in bats, via dampening of inflammatory responses (limiting the effects of immunopathology), and directly limiting the extent of viral replication, either through restricting the availability of essential factors or by controlling apoptosis. Characterisation of the bat microRNA repertoire is an essential step towards understanding transcriptional regulation during viral infection, and will assist in the identification of mechanisms that enable bats to act as natural virus reservoirs. This in turn will facilitate the development of antiviral strategies for use in humans and other species.

Keywords

Bats Chiroptera Pteropus alecto MicroRNA Non-coding RNA Transcriptome

Background

More than 20% of all mammalian species are bats, making them an extraordinarily important and successful group from an evolutionary perspective [1]. Bats are unique amongst mammals for their ability to fly, and possess notable traits such as long life expectancy in proportion to body size [2]. Many species of bats exhibit exotic traits including echolocation and hibernation, and bats are an important part of the ecosystem via plant pollination and insect control [3]. Notoriously, bats are also reservoir hosts for a large number of zoonotic viruses [4]. Understanding the mechanisms by which bats co-exist with and seemingly tolerate viruses that are deadly in humans and other mammals has implications for human health, and may facilitate development of new antiviral strategies.

One aspect of the bat-virus relationship that has not been investigated in detail is the role of host gene regulation, in particular the role of microRNAs (miRNAs). MiRNAs are essential regulators of eukaryotic gene expression [5] and include elements required for viral replication [6]. MiRNA biogenesis is a multistep process in which primary-miRNA transcripts (pri-miRNA) are cleaved into precursor-miRNA (pre-miRNA) by the nuclear RNase III DROSHA and then further processed in the cytoplasm by DICER1 to produce mature miRNAs averaging 22 nt in length [5]. This process produces transcripts from both arms of the precursor, whereas the loop and flanking sequences are destroyed. This information is exploited by miRNA-finding algorithms such as miRDeep2 for the identification of miRNA-like sequences in small RNA transcriptome data.

Mature miRNAs have been found in over 150 species of plants, animals and viruses [7, 8]. While no P. alecto miRNAs have yet been reported, recent studies identified miRNAs in the Little brown bat Myotis lucifugus[912], the Big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus[13], and the Jamaican flying fox, Artebius jamaicensis[14]. Additionally, bat genomes within the Ensembl database (P. vampyrus and M. lucifugus) feature miRNA annotations based on homology to the human genome.

In this study, the small RNA transcriptome of the Black flying fox (P. alecto) was sequenced from a pooled tissue sample. MiRDeep2 was used to identify conserved and novel miRNAs, and a variety of methods were employed to assess those predictions. Target prediction and annotation enrichment analysis were undertaken to identify miRNAs with putative roles in pathways that are relevant to virus-host interaction. These results will enable fundamental insights into miRNA-mediated gene regulation in bats, and are an important step towards determining the molecular basis of bats’ role as virus reservoirs.

Results

Identification of P. alectomiRNAs

Illumina deep-sequencing of small RNA from pooled P. alecto tissues yielded a total of 3,886,079 reads, each 36 nucleotides in length, which have been submitted to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA210946. Figure 1 illustrates the analysis pipeline used to identify miRNAs. Approximately 30% of the raw reads were discarded during data filtering, mainly due to absence of the 3’ adapter (15.6%). Data quality was examined before and after trimming and filtering (Additional file 1: Figure S1). MiRNAs were then identified using miRDeep2. As no P. alecto miRNAs were known prior to this undertaking, miRDeep2 was provided with a large set of learning information in the form of all known vertebrate miRNAs from a recent release of miRBase (version 19). This resulted in identification of 426 distinct miRNA precursors, from which 551 different mature and star transcripts were detected (Figure 2, Additional file 2: Table S1). While 361 (85%) of the precursors mapped to a unique locus, the remaining 65 consisted of 31 overlapping pairs plus an overlapping triplet. For 27 of these pairs, the presence of star reads for one member only and/or large differences in miRDeep2 scores indicated the likely precursor (Additional file 3: Table S2). The lower scoring precursor in each of these cases was excluded from further analysis. Six overlapping pairs remained unresolved, either due to an absence of star reads or because mature and star sequences were palindromic, thus the set of P. alecto miRNAs in this dataset consists of 399 candidates.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-682/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_6398_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Overview of the miRNA discovery pipeline. Unsuitable reads were discarded at each stage of preprocessing. High quality reads were subjected to miRDeep2 analysis, followed by further culling based on novelty, score and read depth. A total of 426 P. alecto miRNAs passed the initial filtering stages. A further 27 candidates were later culled from the analysis.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-682/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_6398_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Size and frequency of P. alecto mature miRNAs. (A) Length distribution of P. alecto mature miRNAs. (B) Read-count distribution of mature miRNAs (trimmed + filtered + mapped reads only). Drawn in log10 scale.

MiRDeep2 flagged four putative miRNAs as possible tRNA/rRNA. To incorporate the latest knowledge of non-coding (nc) RNA, we compared predicted P. alecto miRNA precursors with all known ncRNA in a recent version of RFAM (version 11.0) (Additional file 4: Table S3). A total of 222 P. alecto miRNAs were supported by RFAM hits to known miRNAs. A further nineteen exhibited similarity to other types of ncRNA. Hits to ncRNAs other than miRNAs do not necessarily preclude candidates from being true miRNAs, however they may be less reliable than other candidates.

Homology to miRNAs in other species

Bat miRNAs were compared to the following collections of reference miRNA sequence data: MiRBase version 20 (all vertebrates); Biggar et al. [9]; Platt et al. [13]; Ensembl (P. vampyrus, M. lucifugus). Of the 399 P. alecto miRNAs examined, a total of 233 mature sequences and 145 star sequences were 100% identical to mature vertebrate entries in miRBase. P. alecto miRNAs were then compared to the reference data using BLASTN (Figure 3, Additional file 5: Table S4). To allow for minor length variations, all mature and star BLAST searches were filtered such that the ends of each alignment were allowed to overhang but were not allowed to mismatch. This revealed an additional 36 P. alecto mature miRNAs that had hits to miRBase 20 vertebrates with 100% internal identity but one or more over- hanging or under-hanging ends. A further 34 mature P. alecto miRNAs had high-scoring hits to miRBase 20 vertebrates but contained internal mismatches or gaps, while 96 P. alecto mature miRNAs had no reliable hits against miRBase 20 vertebrates at all. This process was repeated using mature, star and precursor sequences against each of the reference datasets, producing hits for a further 30 P. alecto miRNAs. Of the remaining 66 P. alecto miRNAs that had no BLAST hits at all, 35 had miRDeep2 scores ≥ 1 and three had miRDeep2 scores ≥ 30.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-682/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_6398_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Homology of bat miRNAs to vertebrate mature miRNAs in miRBase. P. alecto mature and star miRNAs were compared to a database of all vertebrate miRNAs extracted from miRBase (version 20) using BLASTN. 100% identity indicates that no internal gaps or mismatches were present in alignments between P. alecto miRNAs and their respective top BLAST hits. Minor length variations were allowed in this category, but the alignments were end-anchored to prevent mismatches at the termini. MiRNAs in the mismatch category had internal mismatches or indels relative to their top BLAST hits, whereas miRNAs in the no-hit category had no convincing BLAST hits. Search parameters are described in detail in the materials and methods.

Notably, two P. alecto precursors (pal-can-280 and pal-can-392) had large numbers of hits to P. vampyrus precursors (38 and 40 hits, respectively), in each case representing a variety of similar but different sequences rather than one single repeated sequence. In contrast, a single P. alecto precursor (pal-can-136) had a similarly high number of hits in M. lucifugus, however this appeared to be due to low-complexity composition of the precursor (GU repeats) as opposed to genuine homology.

MiRNAs in introns and clusters

Many miRNAs are located within the introns of protein-coding genes [15]. We identified 98 miRNAs physically located within introns of annotated bat genes, while three (pal-can-011, pal-can-306, pal-can-346) were fully overlapping with coding exons (Additional file 6: Table S5). Of these, pal-can-346 (miR-1306) is located within an exon of DGCR8, a protein involved in miRNA biogenesis in humans [16]. Five miRNAs overlapped with exon boundaries and could potentially be regulated by splicing events [17].

Many miRNAs are arranged in local clusters on chromosomes [18]. The P. alecto genome currently consists of contigs and scaffolds that are not yet mapped to individual chromosomes, however with an N50 size of 15.8 Mb [19], many scaffolds are easily large enough to contain such clusters. MiRNA clusters were located by identifying miRNAs spaced less than 5000 bp apart. miRNA pairs located < 60 bp apart were shown to be overlapping as described above. Such pairs were treated as a single entity and were only considered part of a cluster if they grouped with at least one other non-overlapping miRNA. A total of 42 clusters comprising 140 miRNA genes were identified according to these criteria (Additional file 7: Table S6).

The largest identified bat miRNA cluster contained 33 miRNAs and is homologous to the recognised DLK1-DIO3 cluster on human chromosome 14, known to be involved in disease pathogenesis [20]. Three novel bat miRNAs were located within this cluster, including one (pal-can-276) that returned BLAST hits to miR-541 but had three mismatches relative to other vertebrates, including two unique differences in the seed region. For the two other novel bat miRNAs within this cluster (pal-can-411 and pal-can-252), the mature sequences produced non-identical BLAST hits to miR-376 and miR-377, respectively, however the star sequences were 100% identical to miR-376 and miR-377 star sequences, respectively.

A total of 22 novel P. alecto miRNAs were located within 13 clusters, and five clusters contained only novel miRNAs. Two such clusters each contained three novel miRNAs that all scored highly by miRDeep2. The first of these consisted of pal-can-102, pal-can-256 and pal-can-103. The closest nearby genes, FMR1 and AFF2, are located a distance of 0.5-1.5 Mb from the miRNA cluster. In the human genome, FMR1 and AFF2 are located on the X chromosome, adjacent to two recognised miRNA clusters (miR-888:892 and miR-506:514). One of the three bat miRNAs in this cluster (pal-can-103) returned a non-identical BLAST hit to dog miR-514, while the other two returned only low-quality hits. The second cluster consisted of pal-can-195, pal-can-261 and pal-can-303. One of these (pal-can-303) returned a BLAST hit to miR-506, while the other two returned only low-quality BLAST hits (however these included miR-465, which is also located on the X chromosome in humans and a member of an equivalent miRNA cluster in rodents). Thus the two novel-only clusters appear to represent parts of the same cluster split over multiple scaffolds. Based on homology, nine additional miRNAs were identified that may also belong to this cluster. A proposed arrangement is shown in Figure 4. Overall, 15 bat miRNAs may represent members of a cluster homologous to the human X-chromosomal miR-506:514 cluster. Only one of these (pal-can-332) shares 100% mature sequence identity with a known vertebrate miRNA (miR-507), while the remaining 14 are unique to P. alecto. Alignment of the individual sequences indicated that while BLAST was unable to identify homologues for more than half of these miRNAs, a degree of similarity amongst them was clearly evident (Additional file 8: Figure S2).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-682/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_6398_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Proposed clustering of P. alecto miRNAs corresponding to the human ChrX miR-506:514 cluster. Protein-coding genes are denoted by red arrows, miRNAs by blue arrows. P. alecto mature miRNAs that yielded BLAST hits to known vertebrate miRNAs are connected to their human counterpart by colored lines indicating whether they shared 100% sequence identity (blue) or were non-identical (orange).

Seed sequence analysis

The nucleotide sequence corresponding to bases 2–7 of a mature miRNA (the seed region) is the most important region for determining target specificity [21]. The seed sequences of P. alecto miRNAs were assessed (Additional file 9: Table S7). The 399 bat miRNAs had 273 different seed sequences with 63 seed sequences appearing more than once. The most frequently occurring seeds were GAGGUA (let-7), which appeared 12 times and CUGGAC (mir-378), which appeared 9 times. Compared to miRBase vertebrate mature miRNAs, 40 bat miRNAs (two pairs plus 17 singletons) appeared to have novel seed sequences. A potential weakness of this approach, however, is that if a miRNA has an incorrectly predicted start site, then the predicted seed sequence will also be incorrect. Therefore, only miRNAs that aligned from position #1 in both the bat mature sequence and its top BLAST hit were considered reliable enough to determine true seed sequence. Of the 49 miRNAs with non-identical top BLAST hits, 30 aligned from position #1, however only one of these (pal-can-316) had a seed sequence that was unique amongst miRBase vertebrates.

Given the high probability that at least one unrelated miRBase vertebrate miRNA will match any given seed sequence by chance (the odds are approximately 50:50), further steps were taken to identify bat miRNAs with novel seed sequences. MiRNAs that had non-identical top BLAST hits and also aligned from position #1 in both query and target were individually examined. Of these, five were identified as having one or more unique differences in the seed sequence relative to their top BLAST hit. To confirm these observations, mature and star miRNAs were compared against all of their BLAST hits (not just the top hit), to evaluate whether the observed seed changes were truly unique in these bat miRNAs relative to their counterparts in other vertebrates. The sequences, predicted secondary structures, and top-hit alignments of the five novel-seed miRNAs are illustrated in Figure 5.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-15-682/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_6398_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

P. alecto miRNAs with novel seed sequences. Proposed stem-loop structures of five P. alecto miRNAs with novel seed sequences are shown on the left, based on the minimum free energy confirmations determined by Vienna RNAfold during miRDeep2 processing. Observed mature sequences are drawn in red, predicted loop regions in yellow, observed star sequences in light blue and predicted star sequences in purple. Alignments between P. alecto miRNAs and their respective top BLAST hits are shown on the right with the seed regions highlighted in bold.

Three of the five novel-seed miRNAs (pal-can-276, pal-can-133 and pal-can-316) had both mature and star sequences that were unique to P. alecto in the sense that they were not shared by any of the BLAST hits to these sequences. Two of these (pal-can-276 and pal-can-133) had seed sequences (AGGGGU and GCCUAG) that were shared by single vertebrate entries in miRBase (gga-miR-1761 and hsa-miR-3135a, respectively), yet they did not resemble those miRNAs in any other respect. In contrast, pal-can-316 seed sequence (UCGCAA) was completely unique amongst vertebrates, in the sense that it was not shared by any vertebrate miRNA, including unrelated sequences. These three miRNAs had mature/star read counts of 162/0, 36/8 and 10/0, respectively.

The two remaining P. alecto miRNAs (pal-can-411 and pal-can-134) had mature seed sequences distinct from those of their BLAST hits, however their star sequences matched with 100% identity to miRBase entries. Of these, pal-can-134 had mature/star read counts of 31/1; however only a single mature read was detected for pal-can-411.

Ranking of novel candidate miRNAs

In addition to the bat miRNAs with confirmed novel seed sequences, a shortlist of the most promising novel miRNA candidates was constructed by narrowing the master list by excluding conserved miRNAs and those with low support. The following were excluded: (1) Putative miRNAs with 100%-identity BLAST hit (either mature or star) to a miRBase vertebrate entry, (2) Putative miRNAs with a miRDeep2 score below 1.0, (3) Putative miRNAs with a read count below 10, (4) Putative miRNAs that overlapped with another miRNA and either scored substantially less than the overlapping partner or could not be differentiated from it based on score, (5) Putative miRNAs with a non-miRNA hit in RFAM. This left 30 miRNAs, considered the most promising novel candidates for further study (Table 1).
Table 1

Top 30 novel miRNAs in P. alecto

miRNA

miRDeep2 score

Mature reads

Loop reads

Star reads

Mature sequence

Top BLAST hit

pal-can-034

1273.2

2480

0

11

augaccuaugaaucgacagaca

cgr-miR-215-5p

pal-can-081

145.7

267

0

10

accugugcccuucugaguagc

rno-miR-465-3p

pal-can-091

91.6

130

0

41

aauggcaccuuucugaguagu

ppy-miR-513a-2-3p

pal-can-101

69.3

111

0

23

ugcugcucagggacggggcga

 

pal-can-102

69.2

131

0

3

ugcuagggcuagagagcgagugc

 

pal-can-103

61.3

106

0

6

ugauugacagcuuugagagugg

cfa-miR-514

pal-can-119

37.1

33

0

38

gaccuaagcccuucugaguau

 

pal-can-125

30.1

45

0

5

caacucuaaggggcaucauuca

 

pal-can-133

23.5

36

0

8

cgccuagaugaugccuuucuu

ppy-miR-337-3p

pal-can-140

15.3

11

5

12

aaaugguacccuagugacuaca

rno-miR-224-3p

pal-can-157

6.6

11

0

1

uaacaggcauuucugagguga

 

pal-can-187

5.5

81

0

0

uuuccggcuuagugggugugu

eca-miR-1180

pal-can-179

5.5

38

0

4

uacucagaaggggccagguuac

 

pal-can-195

5.4

38

0

4

uacucagaaggggccagguuac

 

pal-can-227

4.9

25

0

0

aucucgguggaaccucca

 

pal-can-231

4.8

44

0

0

gagagaucagaggugcagagu

bta-miR-6529

pal-can-245

4.5

10

0

0

uugcagcugccgggagugauuu

eca-miR-1301

pal-can-247

4.3

10

0

0

aggggcagcaugguguagcag

 

pal-can-249

4.3

50

0

0

uagguaguuucuuguuguuggg

ssc-miR-196b

pal-can-254

3.8

267

0

0

cagaagaguagauugauuggu

 

pal-can-257

2.9

69

0

0

agagguaaaaauuugauuuga

bta-miR-6119-5p

pal-can-263

2.5

43

0

0

aggaauguaaagaagcaugu

 

pal-can-271

2.1

69

0

0

acaucaagacuaggcauacacug

 

pal-can-276

1.8

162

0

0

aagggguucugccgucgguc

oar-miR-541-5p

pal-can-278

1.8

12

0

0

aucucgcuggggccucca

 

pal-can-280

1.7

25

0

0

ucaagucccuguucgggcgcca

mmu-miR-5097

pal-can-290

1.5

23

0

0

ugggggagagaacagguagaca

 

pal-can-303

1.2

14

0

0

aauuugggccuuucugaguaga

age-miR-506

pal-can-307

1

15

0

0

agccuugugacugacgaucggaca

 

pal-can-316

0.9

10

0

0

uucgcaagaaggugucauucau

age-miR-513c

Target prediction

It has been recognised that 3’ UTRs are the preferred location for miRNA binding sites in mRNA targets [5]. Target prediction was performed for the 399 mature P. alecto miRNAs using the target scanning algorithm miRanda and a database of 3’ UTRs derived from P. alecto transcriptome data. To avoid potential artefacts, excessively long 3’ UTRs (those more than 2500 nt in length) were excluded, resulting in a search space representing 6021 different P. alecto genes corresponding to 5899 different human genes (the remaining 122 are bat-specific gene duplications). The median number of predicted gene targets per miRNA was 77, while the median number of predicted miRNA hits per target gene was 7, which in some cases included multiple hits from an individual miRNA.

The highest-scoring miR:Target prediction was pal-can-170:USP36, which had 10 binding sites and a cumulative minimum free energy (E_sum) of −217.80. Other high scoring miR:Target predictions were pal-can-421:DNMBP (six binding sites, E_sum = −152.27); and pal-can-207/pal-can-098:ZNF768 (six binding sites each, E_sum = −143.30), and pal-can-290:RAPGEF1 (six binding sites, E_sum = −138.79). The highest-scoring miR:Target predictions for individual sites were pal-can-194:ALG3 with a minimum free energy (E) of −50.51; and pal-can-300:FANCI (E = −45.27).

Amongst the most important miRNA targets are transcription factors, since these can extend a miRNA’s regulatory influence to multiple secondary targets. Of the ~1400 transcription factors currently recognised within the human genome [22], 325 were present within the P. alecto 3’ UTR database, including factors of immune-relevance such as interferon regulatory factors (IRF1, IRF3, IRF8) and NF-κB (RELA, RELB, NFKB1). MiR: Target predictions involving transcription factors are listed in Additional file 10: Table S8. Predicted targets of the novel bat miRNA pal-can-276 included the transcription factor ZFAT, involved in apoptosis and cell survival, as well as a number of genes with significant roles in apoptosis and host defence (Table 2).
Table 2

Selected gene target predictions for novel P. alecto miRNA pal-can-276 (miR-541)

Pteropus alecto gene

Gene ID

Gene name

Minimum free energy (Best hit)

3’ UTR length

Hit positions

PAL_GLEAN_10012524

USP20

ubiquitin specific peptidase 20

−28.73

1592

1189

PAL_GLEAN_10020514

DDIT4

DNA-damage-inducible transcript 4

−28.62

881

725

PAL_GLEAN_10016798

CXXC5

CXXC finger 5

−25.01

578

246,390

PAL_GLEAN_10009170

USP19

ubiquitin specific peptidase 19

−23.6

570

153

PAL_GLEAN_10002258

POLM

polymerase (DNA directed), mu

−23.07

2124

127

PAL_GLEAN_10012978

TNFRSF1B

tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 1B

−22.97

1595

155

PAL_GLEAN_10025525

LRRC32

leucine rich repeat containing 32

−21.93

2398

2193

PAL_GLEAN_10012819

LRRFIP2

leucine rich repeat (in FLII) interacting protein 2

−21.91

1906

1405

PAL_GLEAN_10006697

CRLF1

cytokine receptor-like factor 1

−21.56

754

651

PAL_GLEAN_10015148

IL28RA

interleukin 28 receptor, alpha (interferon, lambda receptor)

−21.08

1404

1334

PAL_GLEAN_10014403

ATG9A

ATG9 autophagy related 9 homolog A (S. cerevisiae)

−20.74

1437

443

PAL_GLEAN_10020540

AIFM2

apoptosis-inducing factor, mitochondrion-associated, 2

−20.45

2358

832

PAL_GLEAN_10010342

ZFAT

zinc finger and AT hook domain containing

−20.09

679

164

Categorical enrichment analysis based on Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway annotations were performed using the lists of predicted target genes for each miRNA (Additional file 11: Table S9, Additional file 12: Table S10). Ranked by Bonferroni-corrected p-values, the most significantly enriched GO terms were GO:0006357: “regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter” (pal-can-247) and GO:0000278: “mitotic cell cycle” (pal-can-379); GO:0006325: “chromatin organization” (pal-can-354). The most significantly enriched KEGG pathways were hsa04912: GnRH signalling pathway (pal-can-085); hsa04060: Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction (pal-can-088); hsa04012: ErbB signalling pathway (pal-can-170); and hsa03030: DNA replication (pal-can-300).

Discussion

Bats have long held special significance in the contexts of ecology and mammalian evolution, but have only recently been recognised as a major source of emerging infectious diseases [4]. To date, P. alecto miRNAs have not been studied yet are likely to play significant roles in important cellular functions including immunity, apoptosis, the cell cycle, inflammation, and DNA repair. In this study, 399 putative miRNAs were identified in the small RNA transcriptome of the Black flying fox, P. alecto, of which 269 had mature sequences with 100% identity to known vertebrate miRNAs in miRBase and 34 had homologs in miRBase but contained unique differences. The remaining 96 had no clear homology to known miRNAs, yet many were predicted with high confidence and appear to be genuine novel bat miRNAs.

The number of miRNAs identified in P. alecto falls broadly within the range observed for other mammals. For the 38 vertebrate species used for comparative analysis in this study, the number of miRBase records ranged from 1 to 1881. Different studies have used different tissues, different quantities of data, different methods and different parameters for identifying miRNAs, making direct comparisons difficult. In two somewhat comparable studies, miRDeep2 was used to identify 399 miRNAs in the pig intestine, including 354 with a miRDeep2 score above −3 [23], while in silico analysis of the horse genome identified a total of 406 miRNAs [24]. Studies in other species of bats have reported varying numbers of precursors, the highest being 762, identified using miRanalyzer on ~20 million reads, with further confirmation provided by > 200 million additional reads [13]. Another recent paper detected 887 mature and star miRNAs corresponding to 568 precursors in the mouse transcriptome, however this was achieved using almost 90 million Illumina reads [25], more than 20x the data volume used in the present study. From these comparisons it can be concluded that the number of miRNAs observed in the bat transcriptome can be considered fairly typical. For 196 of the 399 bat miRNAs, reads corresponding to both mature and star sequences were detected, further increasing the likelihood that these miRNAs result from specific miRNA biogenesis.

There is, as yet, no universally accepted procedure for identifying novel miRNAs in high-throughput sequencing data. In our study, the major factor determining the final number of miRNAs was the miRDeep2 score. As may be expected, lowering the cut-off score involves a trade-off between sensitivity (fewer false negatives) and specificity (more false positives). A cut-off score ≥ 1 provides a typical starting point for miRNA identification; however many highly-conserved miRNAs which are very likely to be real do not meet this stringent cut-off. If the cut-off score is lowered, however, the number of highly improbable candidates rapidly increases. Relying on a single, stringent cut-off point comes at a significant cost of missing many genuine miRNAs. We concluded that within our data, miRDeep2 score and read depth were the factors that best enabled miRNA identification. We chose a model that accepted all hits to known miRNAs (regardless of score), novel hits with scores ≥ 1 and read depth ≥ 2 (typical hits), and novel hits with scores ≥ −5 and read depth ≥ 5 (outliers). Following the initial screening, a further 27 candidates were culled because they overlapped higher-scoring candidates, leaving a total of 399 candidates under consideration. This model, in our opinion, reflected a better balance between sensitivity and specificity than a single parameter cut-off model. In support of our decision, we found that 48 out of the 96 miRNAs that scored less than 1 returned good BLAST hits to known vertebrate miRNAs in miRBase. The remaining 48 could not be specifically identified, but included 8 in clusters and 13 that had BLAST hits to mature miRNAs in other bats. Our further effort to prioritise novel miRNA candidates based on the combined evidence provides additional guidance to assist with selecting candidates for further study.

One miRNA (pal-can-276) featured noticeably in the analysis. Representing a homolog of miR-541, this P. alecto miRNA contained three unique changes in the mature sequence relative to other vertebrates, including two changes within the critical seed region. Amongst its predicted gene targets was ZFAT, a zinc-finger protein with roles in cell survival and apoptosis (particularly in immune-related cells) [26], and the TNF-receptor TNFRSF1B. In the rat, miR-541 is described as a brain-specific miRNA involved in neuron proliferation and neurite outgrowth via suppression of synapsin I [27], while the corresponding star sequence (which is also unique to P. alecto including one difference in the seed region), has been reported to be downregulated in a region of the brain (the spinal dorsal horn) in rats with experimentally-induced neuropathic pain [28]. It is well established that miRNAs play important roles in apoptosis [2931], and one possibility is that viruses such as HeV block apoptosis via induction of host miRNAs that downregulate pro-apoptotic genes. P. alecto miR-541 is a candidate miRNA in such a scenario, however it remains to be experimentally determined as to whether the differences in the sequence of P. alecto miR-541 correspond to differences in function between bats and other mammals, or whether it plays any role in apoptosis.

Four other miRNAs, representing homologs of miR-337, miR-377, miR-513c and miR-885 respectively, were also confirmed to have novel seed sequences in P. alecto. In humans, miR-513 is located within a cluster (miR-506:514) that is overexpressed in melanoma [32]. In P. alecto, the novel miR-513 is also located within a putative cluster containing 14 other miRNAs (Figure 4b), the majority of which are novel. We note, however, that this cluster may be fast-evolving in mammals [33, 34]. MiRNAs in true genomic clusters are not only close together, but are transcribed as a polycistronic transcript from a single promoter, therefore promoter analysis may also be required to confirm genuine polycistronic clusters [35].

Amongst the 30 most significant novel miRNAs identified in P. alecto (Table 1), 15 were homologous to known vertebrate miRNAs but contained unique differences, while the remaining 15 could not be aligned to existing miRNAs and may represent unique or highly divergent bat miRNAs. In addition to those already discussed, several miRNAs within this set have significant functional roles in other mammals, some with potential significance to bat biology. We previously showed that in P. alecto, TP53 (p53) and MDM2 contain mutations in subcellular localization signals required for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling [19]. MiR-215, which plays a role in the TP53:MDM2 interaction [36, 37], is unique in P. alecto and is presented in Table 1.

Bats have a concentration of positively selected genes within the oxidative phosphorylation pathway, believed to reflect adaptations necessary for flight-related energy metabolism [38]. Our recent analysis of bat genomes revealed positive selection within the DNA damage response pathway and NF-κB pathway in bats, possibly reflecting compensatory adaptations to tolerate harmful byproducts produced by elevated metabolism [19]. Target prediction found a putative connection between pal-can-300 (miR-874) and FANCI, which is involved in DNA repair. Other miRNAs known to be involved in oxidative phosphorylation include miR-34a [39] and miR-338 [40], however both of these are conserved in P. alecto.

Future directions involving miRNAs in the Black flying fox include analysis of differential miRNA expression, correlating miRNA expression with that of putative gene targets, and experimental validation of targets for individual miRNA candidates. Such studies will be greatly facilitated by the dataset, methods, and analysis pipeline provided in this study.

Conclusions

In summary, 399 putative miRNAs have been identified in the Black flying fox small RNA transcriptome. This includes a number of novel miRNAs that represent homologs of known miRNAs with functions relevant to bat biology. These findings will facilitate further studies of gene regulation in bats in relation to their role as virus reservoirs and may shed light on mechanisms underlying bat-specific traits such as flight and longevity.

Methods

High-throughput sequencing of small RNAs isolated from Pteropus alecto

Fourteen tissues (bone, brain, heart, kidney, large intestine, small intestine, liver, lung, muscle, lymph nodes, salivary glands, skin, spleen and testes) were harvested from four male Black flying foxes (P. alecto) captured in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. All experiments were approved by the Australian Animal Health Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee. Equal amounts of tissue from each organ were pooled from the four bats and processed using the MirVana miRNA isolation kit (Ambion, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturers’ guidelines. Bat small RNA was prepared for Illumina sequencing as follows: ~7 μg total RNA was size-fractionated by Novex 15% TBE-Urea gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and RNA fragments between 20 and 30 bases in length were isolated. The purified small RNAs were ligated with 5’ adapters (Illumina, San Diego, CA). To remove un-ligated adapters, ligation products were gel purified on Novex 15% TBE-Urea gel. Subsequently, RNA fragments were ligated with 3’ adapters (Illumina). After gel purification on Novex 10% TBE-Urea gel, fragments with adapters at both ends (70–90 bases in length) were reverse transcribed and subjected to 15 cycles of PCR. Amplification products were loaded on Novex 6% TBE gel (Invitrogen) and the gel band containing 90- to 100-bp fragments was excised. Purified cDNA was used directly for cluster generation and 36 cycles of sequencing analysis using the Illumina Cluster Station and 1G Genome Analyzer following manufacturer’s protocols.

Identification of miRNAs in deep sequencing data

The quality of Illumina deep sequencing data was examined using FastQC (version 0.9.5) [41]. Adapters were trimmed using Cutadapt (version 1.2.1) [42] with the following options: −a TCGTATGCCGTCTTCTGCTTG --discard-untrimmed -m 18 -M 26 -O 10. The option -a indicates the adapter sequence to trim, while -m and -M designate the minimum and maximum length reads to keep after trimming. -O indicates the minimum number of matching bases required to trigger adapter recognition. Trimmed reads were filtered using the FASTX-Toolkit [43]. Fastx_artifacts_filter was run with default settings to remove reads consisting of > 90% homopolymers, followed by fastq_quality_filter with the following options: −q 16 -p 90, meaning at least 90% of bases in a read needed quality scores of at least 16 for the read to be retained). Filtered reads were processed for miRNA content using miRDeep2 [44]. Filtered reads were pre-processed using the mapper.pl module with the following options: −e -j -h -m. The -e option designates FASTQ input data, −j removes sequencing reads with called nucleotides other than A, C, G, T and N, −h converts to FASTA format and -m assigns reads with identical sequence to a single FASTA entry with a header tag designating the combined read count. Pre-processed reads were then analysed for miRNA content using the miRDeep2.pl module with the following options: mature_ref_vertebrates mature_ref_vertebrates none -a 1 -b −5. The first three fields designate reference files containing known miRNAs (mature this species, mature other species, precursor this species). In the absence of known P. alecto miRNAs, a database consisting of all known vertebrate mature miRNAs (as recorded in miRBase version 20) was constructed and used in both of the first two fields, while the third field was left intentionally blank (“none”). The option -a indicates the minimum read depth, while -b indicates the minimum miRDeep2 score for a hit to be retained (Note that novel miRNAs with only a single read were later filtered out as described below). All miRNAs identified by miRDeep2 as “known” were retained according to these settings, while “novel” miRNAs were further filtered according to the following rules: Group 1 (score ≥ 1, read depth ≥ 2), or Group 2 (score ≥ −5, read depth ≥ 5). “Novel” miRNAs that did not fall into either category were considered unreliable and were discarded.

Bioinformatics analysis of bat miRNAs

Overlapping miRNAs, miRNAs within introns, physical clustering and seed sequence usage were analysed using in-house python scripts. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) were identified by RFAM batch search [45]. Homologs were identified using standalone command line BLAST (version 2.2.29) [46]. For comparison, vertebrate mature, star and precursor miRNA sequences were obtained from miRBase (version 20) [47]. The vertebrate reference miRNA set consisted of 38 species, made up of 25 mammals (5 Laurasatherians, 13 primates, 3 rodents, 3 marsupials, 1 monotreme), and 13 non-mammals (10 fish, 2 birds, 1 reptile). Pteropus vampyrus and Myotis lucifugus predicted miRNA precursor sequences were obtained from Ensembl. Additional datasets were obtained from supplementary materials accompanying published articles by Biggar et al. [9], Platt et al. [13]. For identification of mature and star miRNAs by BLASTN, the following options were used: −strand plus -evalue 10 -word_size 4 -penalty −4 -reward 5 -gapopen 8 -gapextend 6. MiRNAs were then categorised as 100% match, mismatch or no hit, relative to their top BLAST hits. Within the 100% match category, miRNAs were allowed to have up to 3 bp over/underhanging at the ends (a maximum of 2 bp was allowed for each individual end), relative to their top BLAST hit. This step that we refer to as ‘end-anchoring’ was accomplished using the custom BLAST output format and the command-line tool awk, and was deemed necessary to account for minor length variations in mature forms, but to screen out hits in which the alignment is merely truncated due to terminal mismatches. For identification of precursor miRNAs, the same parameters were used, except the minimum e_value was set to 0.001 and hits were filtered for > 80% identity and > 80% overlap using awk. Top hits were identified by e-value from the BLAST output using in-house python scripts. If multiple high-scoring hits were present, hits were further ranked by species in the following order (human, horse, cow, pig, dog, sheep, mouse, rat, macaque, gorilla, other) to facilitate downstream annotation analysis. Multiple sequence alignments were performed using MEGA (version 5) [48]. Putative miRNA targets were identified using miRanda [49] with the following options: −en −20 -strict. The -en option defines the minimum free energy threshold for a miRNA-target pairing, while the -strict option demands perfect complementarity between the miRNA seed region and the target. A database for miR:Target prediction was constructed as follows: Using P. alecto transcriptome data assembled against the reference P. alecto genome [19], 3’ UTRs were extracted using a python script. Sequences were filtered to exclude those that exceeded 2500 nt in length as they may not reflect genuine mRNAs, while others lacking gene IDs were excluded on the basis that they were unsuitable for annotation enrichment analysis. Functional annotation clustering analyses (GO and KEGG) were performed using the DAVID web service [50] accessed via python scripts. Due to the large number of hits for GO enrichment, an additional filter of FDR < 1.0 was applied.

Availability of supporting data

The raw sequencing data have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject PRJNA210946. MicroRNA sequences have been submitted to miRBase.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

M.R.F. is supported by EMBO Long-Term fellowship ALTF 225–2011. We wish to acknowledge Alysha Heimberg for helpful advice regarding the identification of novel miRNAs.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory
(2)
Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute
(3)
Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) and Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF)
(4)
Program in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

References

  1. Teeling EC, Springer MS, Madsen O, Bates P, O’Brien SJ, Murphy WJ: A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science. 2005, 307 (5709): 580-584.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunet-Rossinni AK, Austad SN: Ageing studies on bats: a review. Biogerontology. 2004, 5 (4): 211-222.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kunz TH, Braun de Torrez E, Bauer D, Lobova T, Fleming TH: Ecosystem services provided by bats. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011, 1223: 1-38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Calisher CH, Childs JE, Field HE, Holmes KV, Schountz T: Bats: important reservoir hosts of emerging viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006, 19 (3): 531-545.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009, 136 (2): 215-233.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Jopling CL, Yi M, Lancaster AM, Lemon SM, Sarnow P: Modulation of hepatitis C virus RNA abundance by a liver-specific MicroRNA. Science. 2005, 309 (5740): 1577-1581.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Griffiths-Jones S: The microRNA registry. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (Database issue): D109-D111.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Griffiths-Jones S, Grocock RJ, Van Dongen S, Bateman A, Enright AJ: miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (Database issue): D140-D144.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Biggar KK, Storey KB: Identification and expression of microRNA in the brain of hibernating bats. Myotis Lucifugus Gene. 2014, 544 (1): 67-74.Google Scholar
  10. Iwanowicz DD, Iwanowicz LR, Hitt NP, King TL: Differential Expression Profiles of microRNA in the Little Brown Bat (Myotis lucifugus) Associated with White Nose Syndrome Affected and Unaffected Individuals. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1099. 2013, Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1099Google Scholar
  11. Kornfeld SF, Biggar KK, Storey KB: Differential expression of mature microRNAs involved in muscle maintenance of hibernating little brown bats, Myotis lucifugus: a model of muscle atrophy resistance. Genomics Proteomics Bioinf. 2012, 10 (5): 295-301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Maistrovski Y, Biggar KK, Storey KB: HIF-1alpha regulation in mammalian hibernators: role of non-coding RNA in HIF-1alpha control during torpor in ground squirrels and bats. J Comp Physiol B Biochem Syst Environ Physiol. 2012, 182 (6): 849-859.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Platt RN, Vandewege MW, Kern C, Schmidt CJ, Hoffmann FG, Ray DA: Large numbers of novel miRNAs originate from DNA transposons and are coincident with a large species radiation in bats. Mol Biol Evol. 2014, 31 (6): 1536-1545.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Shaw TI, Srivastava A, Chou WC, Liu L, Hawkinson A, Glenn TC, Adams R, Schountz T: Transcriptome sequencing and annotation for the Jamaican fruit bat (Artibeus jamaicensis). PLoS One. 2012, 7 (11): e48472-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gromak N: Intronic microRNAs: a crossroad in gene regulation. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012, 40 (4): 759-761.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Triboulet R, Chang HM, Lapierre RJ, Gregory RI: Post-transcriptional control of DGCR8 expression by the Microprocessor. RNA. 2009, 15 (6): 1005-1011.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Melamed Z, Levy A, Ashwal-Fluss R, Lev-Maor G, Mekahel K, Atias N, Gilad S, Sharan R, Levy C, Kadener S, Ast G: Alternative splicing regulates biogenesis of miRNAs located across exon-intron junctions. Mol Cell. 2013, 50 (6): 869-881.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Altuvia Y, Landgraf P, Lithwick G, Elefant N, Pfeffer S, Aravin A, Brownstein MJ, Tuschl T, Margalit H: Clustering and conservation patterns of human microRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (8): 2697-2706.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang G, Cowled C, Shi Z, Huang Z, Bishop-Lilly KA, Fang X, Wynne JW, Xiong Z, Baker ML, Zhao W, Tachedjian M, Zhu Y, Zhou P, Jiang X, Ng J, Yang L, Wu L, Xiao J, Feng Y, Chen Y, Sun X, Zhang Y, Marsh GA, Crameri G, Broder CC, Frey KG, Wang LF, Wang J: Comparative analysis of bat genomes provides insight into the evolution of flight and immunity. Science. 2013, 339 (6118): 456-460.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Benetatos L, Hatzimichael E, Londin E, Vartholomatos G, Loher P, Rigoutsos I, Briasoulis E: The microRNAs within the DLK1-DIO3 genomic region: involvement in disease pathogenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013, 70 (5): 795-814.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis BP, Shih IH, Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Burge CB: Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell. 2003, 115 (7): 787-798.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Vaquerizas JM, Kummerfeld SK, Teichmann SA, Luscombe NM: A census of human transcription factors: function, expression and evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2009, 10 (4): 252-263.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharbati S, Friedlander MR, Sharbati J, Hoeke L, Chen W, Keller A, Stahler PF, Rajewsky N, Einspanier R: Deciphering the porcine intestinal microRNA transcriptome. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 275-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhou M, Wang Q, Sun J, Li X, Xu L, Yang H, Shi H, Ning S, Chen L, Li Y, He T, Zheng Y: In silico detection and characteristics of novel microRNA genes in the Equus caballus genome using an integrated ab initio and comparative genomic approach. Genomics. 2009, 94 (2): 125-131.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Li N, You X, Chen T, Mackowiak SD, Friedlander MR, Weigt M, Du H, Gogol-Doring A, Chang Z, Dieterich C, Hu Y, Chen W: Global profiling of miRNAs and the hairpin precursors: insights into miRNA processing and novel miRNA discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41 (6): 3619-3634.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Fujimoto T, Doi K, Koyanagi M, Tsunoda T, Takashima Y, Yoshida Y, Sasazuki T, Shirasawa S: ZFAT is an antiapoptotic molecule and critical for cell survival in MOLT-4 cells. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583 (3): 568-572.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang J, Zhang J, Liu LH, Zhou Y, Li YP, Shao ZH, Wu YJ, Li MJ, Fan YY, Shi HJ: Effects of miR-541 on neurite outgrowth during neuronal differentiation. Cell Biochem Funct. 2011, 29 (4): 279-286.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Li H, Shen L, Ma C, Huang Y: Differential expression of miRNAs in the nervous system of a rat model of bilateral sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury. Int J Mol Med. 2013, 32 (1): 219-226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jovanovic M, Hengartner MO: miRNAs and apoptosis: RNAs to die for. Oncogene. 2006, 25 (46): 6176-6187.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu T, Shao N, Ji C: Targeting microRNAs to modulate TRAIL-induced apoptosis of cancer cells. Cancer Gene Ther. 2013, 20 (1): 33-37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomas MP, Lieberman J: Live or let die: posttranscriptional gene regulation in cell stress and cell death. Immunol Rev. 2013, 253 (1): 237-252.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Streicher KL, Zhu W, Lehmann KP, Georgantas RW, Morehouse CA, Brohawn P, Carrasco RA, Xiao Z, Tice DA, Higgs BW, Richman L, Jallal B, Ranade K, Yao Y: A novel oncogenic role for the miRNA-506-514 cluster in initiating melanocyte transformation and promoting melanoma growth. Oncogene. 2012, 31 (12): 1558-1570.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu Y, Hu W, Wang H, Lu M, Shao C, Menzel C, Yan Z, Li Y, Zhao S, Khaitovich P, Liu M, Chen W, Barnes BM, Yan J: Genomic analysis of miRNAs in an extreme mammalian hibernator, the Arctic ground squirrel. Physiol Genomics. 2010, 42A (1): 39-51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang R, Peng Y, Wang W, Su B: Rapid evolution of an X-linked microRNA cluster in primates. Genome Res. 2007, 17 (5): 612-617.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Yu J, Wang F, Yang GH, Wang FL, Ma YN, Du ZW, Zhang JW: Human microRNA clusters: genomic organization and expression profile in leukemia cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 349 (1): 59-68.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Pichiorri F, Suh SS, Rocci A, De Luca L, Taccioli C, Santhanam R, Zhou W, Benson DM, Hofmainster C, Alder H, Garofalo M, Di Leva G, Volinia S, Lin HJ, Perrotti D, Kuehl M, Aqeilan RI, Palumbo A, Croce CM: Downregulation of p53-inducible microRNAs 192, 194, and 215 impairs the p53/MDM2 autoregulatory loop in multiple myeloma development. Cancer Cell. 2010, 18 (4): 367-381.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. White NM, Khella HW, Grigull J, Adzovic S, Youssef YM, Honey RJ, Stewart R, Pace KT, Bjarnason GA, Jewett MA, Evans AJ, Gabril M, Yousef GM: miRNA profiling in metastatic renal cell carcinoma reveals a tumour-suppressor effect for miR-215. Br J Cancer. 2011, 105 (11): 1741-1749.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Shen YY, Liang L, Zhu ZH, Zhou WP, Irwin DM, Zhang YP: Adaptive evolution of energy metabolism genes and the origin of flight in bats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107 (19): 8666-8671.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Chang SJ, Weng SL, Hsieh JY, Wang TY, Chang MD, Wang HW: MicroRNA-34a modulates genes involved in cellular motility and oxidative phosphorylation in neural precursors derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells. BMC Med Genet. 2011, 4: 65-Google Scholar
  40. Aschrafi A, Kar AN, Natera-Naranjo O, Macgibeny MA, Gioio AE, Kaplan BB: MicroRNA-338 regulates the axonal expression of multiple nuclear-encoded mitochondrial mRNAs encoding subunits of the oxidative phosphorylation machinery. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012, 69 (23): 4017-4027.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. FastQC. [http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/]
  42. Cutadapt. [http://code.google.com/p/cutadapt/]
  43. FASTX-Toolkit. [http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/]
  44. Friedlander MR, Mackowiak SD, Li N, Chen W, Rajewsky N: miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40 (1): 37-52.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. RFAM. [http://rfam.sanger.ac.uk]
  46. Command line BLAST. [http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]
  47. MiRBase. [http://www.mirbase.org]
  48. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011, 28 (10): 2731-2739.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Enright AJ, John B, Gaul U, Tuschl T, Sander C, Marks DS: MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 2003, 5 (1): R1-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. The DAVID web service. [http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp]

Copyright

© Cowled et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.