Open Access

Huntingtin gene evolution in Chordata and its peculiar features in the ascidian Ciona genus

BMC Genomics20067:288

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-288

Received: 07 September 2006

Accepted: 08 November 2006

Published: 08 November 2006

Abstract

Background

To gain insight into the evolutionary features of the huntingtin (htt) gene in Chordata, we have sequenced and characterized the full-length htt mRNA in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis, a basal chordate emerging as new invertebrate model organism. Moreover, taking advantage of the availability of genomic and EST sequences, the htt gene structure of a number of chordate species, including the cogeneric ascidian Ciona savignyi, and the vertebrates Xenopus and Gallus was reconstructed.

Results

The C. intestinalis htt transcript exhibits some peculiar features, such as spliced leader trans-splicing in the 98 nt-long 5' untranslated region (UTR), an alternative splicing in the coding region, eight alternative polyadenylation sites, and no similarities of both 5' and 3'UTRs compared to homologs of the cogeneric C. savignyi. The predicted protein is 2946 amino acids long, shorter than its vertebrate homologs, and lacks the polyQ and the polyP stretches found in the the N-terminal regions of mammalian homologs. The exon-intron organization of the htt gene is almost identical among vertebrates, and significantly conserved between Ciona and vertebrates, allowing us to hypothesize an ancestral chordate gene consisting of at least 40 coding exons.

Conclusion

During chordate diversification, events of gain/loss, sliding, phase changes, and expansion of introns occurred in both vertebrate and ascidian lineages predominantly in the 5'-half of the htt gene, where there is also evidence of lineage-specific evolutionary dynamics in vertebrates. On the contrary, the 3'-half of the gene is highly conserved in all chordates at the level of both gene structure and protein sequence. Between the two Ciona species, a fast evolutionary rate and/or an early divergence time is suggested by the absence of significant similarity between UTRs, protein divergence comparable to that observed between mammals and fishes, and different distribution of repetitive elements.

Background

Huntingtin is a large protein (> 3000 amino acids long in vertebrates), characterized in humans by the presence of an amino-terminal polymorphic polyglutamine (polyQ) tract whose aberrant expansion causes Huntington's Disease (HD), a progressive neurodegenerative disease accompanied by neuronal dysfunction and cell loss in the brain [1]. HD is dominantly inherited, and this observation, together with a number of important experimental results, point to the polyQ tract in the mutant protein as disease-triggering [2]. More recently, it has been proposed that aspects of the disease might be caused by reduced activity of the normal huntingtin protein, indeed a number of biological investigations point to individual protective activities of huntingtin in brain cells [3]. The protein is expressed ubiquitously in humans and rodents, with the highest levels in the neurons of the CNS [4]. Its widespread intracellular localisation does not facilitate the definition of its physiological function. In addition, the large dimension of the protein makes its purification extremely problematic and its three dimensional structure remains unsolved. Because of these difficulties, the study of huntingtin function(s) has largely progressed through gene deletion and gene addition studies that have demonstrated that huntingtin is essential for embryonic development [3]. In addition, huntingtin is important for the survival of brain neurons where it also controls BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) production and delivery [57], axonal transport [8, 9] and neuronal gene transcription [3].

The huntingtin gene or transcript has been characterized in a number of vertebrate and invertebrate species [1017], and it seems to be absent in yeast and lower eukaryotes [16]. Current data demonstrate that huntingtin is a single copy gene – highly conserved in vertebrates but poorly conserved or absent in invertebrates [16]. Indeed, in Drosophila melanogaster huntingtin shows only five regions, accounting for 36% of the whole protein, with high similarity to vertebrate homologs [16], while the gene has not been detected in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. In invertebrate deuterostomes (the tunicate Halocynthia roretzi and two echinodems), only cDNA clones corresponding approximately to the last three hundred amino acids of the protein have been identified and used to investigate the expression pattern, suggesting that neural expression emerged as novel feature in the phylum of chordates, and was absent in primitive deuterostomes [17]. As further peculiarity, huntingtin does not present regions of similarity to other proteins or genes. Only a conserved secondary structure domain has been identified as shared with other proteins, indeed huntingtin is notable for contributing to the definition of HEAT repeats (H untingtin, E longation factor 3, protein phosphatase 2A, T OR1), a 37–43 amino acid motif consisting of two alpha helices forming a helical hairpin [1820]. The HEAT repeats are normally present in tandem arrays or clusters and are indicative of the ability of the protein to mediate protein-protein interactions [21, 22], however they provide only limited clues to the protein function.

Current data thus provide little help in speculations as to the origin and evolution of this large protein, as well as of its Q-rich domain. All comparative studies carried out so far have been focused on the protein, with few studies analyzing the gene structure in single species. In the case of a highly conserved protein such as huntingtin, a detailed comparative study of the exon-intron structure of the gene and its evolution could shed light on the evolution of this gene across chordates and help to identify the regions of the gene (and consequently of the protein) evolving under different functional constraints. The current availability of complete genome sequences for a number of organisms offers the possibility to identify and annotate this large gene and to study its evolutionary dynamics in a large taxonomic sample. In this study we focus our attention on the basal chordate Ciona intestinalis (Tunicata, Ascidiacea). This model organism is of fundamental importance in evolutionary studies, because it has the advantage of being a chordate-invertebrate: as a chordate, this species shows a body plan (at least in the tadpole larval stage) and embryonic development very similar to those of vertebrates [23] but, as an invertebrate, it exhibits enough genetic divergence from vertebrates to allow more incisive evolutionary and comparative analyses at protein level. Thus, the large evolutionary distance separating tunicates and vertebrates (about 520 million years) [24] could allow the identification of a huntingtin "signature" related to the ancestral chordate function of the gene/protein.

In this study we report the characterization of the Ciona intestinalis huntingtin full-length transcript, including the 5' and 3' untranslated regions (UTRs), and the definition of its gene structure using available C. intestinalis genomic sequences. We have thus carried out a comprehensive comparative analysis of the exon-intron structure of the huntingtin gene in chordates, that is between two cogeneric ascidians Ciona intestinalis and Ciona savignyi and eight vertebrate species, including Xenopus and Gallus – whose gene structures were here accurately predicted from genomic sequences.

Results

The Ciona huntingtin transcript

The full-length transcript of the C. intestinalis huntingtin (htt) shows several peculiar features. It ranges from 8919 to 9957 nucleotides (nt) in length, depending on the usage of an alternative splicing site in the coding region and of the polyadenylation site.

The longest protein-coding region (CDS), from the first AUG to the UGA stop codon, is 8841 bp long. A competing 5' splice site in exon 50 allows the synthesis of an alternative transcript lacking 57 nt (19 amino acids) in the C-terminal portion of the encoded protein (Figure 1). In the first exon of C. intestinalis there are no in-frame upstream or downstream AUG with respect to the inferred initiator, whereas in exon 1 of vertebrates there are one or two additional Met codons, depending on the species: in position 4 in non-mammalian species, and in position 8 in all vertebrates. The start codon of C. intestinalis htt is unambiguously homologous to the Met at position 4, common only to non-mammalian vertebrates (see Additional file 1). The same situation is found in C. savignyi.
Figure 1

Amino acid alignment of the huntingtin region corresponding to exon 50–51 of Ciona. The red box indicates the region absent in the alternatively spliced isoform. Identical, similar and conserved positions are reported with different backgrounds.

The complete 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) was determined by 5'RACE and is 98 bp long. As revealed by comparison with the genomic sequence, most of the sequence is encoded by the exon that contains the translation start codon. Surprisingly, the first bases of the 5'UTR were found neither in the first exon, nor in the genomic region 10 kb upstream the first exon, excluding the existence of an upstream micro-exon. On the contrary, this sequence perfectly matches the 16-bp long sequence recognized as spliced leader (SL) in C. intestinalis [25], pointing to an event of trans-splicing in the htt mRNA maturation. The presence of a SL sequence in the mature htt transcript of Ciona prevents both the identification of the transcription start site and the "in silico" characterization of the promoter region.

Although quite short, the 5'UTR contains two upstream ORFs (uORF) that are out-of frame with respect the to translation start: the first uORF is located at position 49 and is immediately followed by a UGA stop codon; the second uORF starts at position 68 and is 15 nt long (amino acid sequence MLSFI, stop codon UAG). In C. savignyi, no sequences with similarity to the C. intestinalis 5'UTR were found in the 10 kbp upstream of the first coding exon. Assuming that as in C. savignyi the sequence 98 bp-long immediately upstream the translation start codon constitutes the 5'UTR, two out-of frame uORFs (60 and 27 nt long) were found in this putative 5'UTR. Moreover, all uORFs exhibit a start codon context different from the Kozak's consensus [26] and there is no similarity between the uORFs of C. intestinalis and C. savignyi.

The start codon context is aaacauaAUGgaa in C. intestinalis, and cauugcgAUGgaa in C. savignyi (assuming the 5'UTR as reported before), thus the purine 3 nt upstream of the start codon, and the G immediately after the start codon are conserved, suggesting a strong context of translation initiation [26].

Seven alternative polyadenylation (polyA) sites were experimentally identified by 3'RACE, and an additional site was found in two EST clones, making a total of eight alternative polyA sites (Table 1). The possibility that some of the identified polyA sites are artifactual mRNA 3' ends due to internal priming was excluded by the absence of long genomic adenine stretches (> 6 bp) adjacent to the polyA cleavage site. Indeed, only the most represented polyA site (5th in Table 1) starts just downstream of an A3CA4 sequence (data not shown). Most polyA sites are associated with a polyA signal, defined as described in Methods, except for two cases (2nd and 6th polyA sites in Table 1). Moreover, the third polyA signal exhibits both unusual sequence and position compared to the polyA site (Table 1). The resulting alternative 3'UTRs range from 37 to 1018 bp, while the most common 3'UTR is 375 bp-long (5th in Table 1). The longest 3'UTR contains a cytoplasmic polyadenylation element (CPE), a signal known to be involved in the regulation of translational activation of quiescent maternal mRNAs during early development in animals [27].
Table 1

Features of the huntingtin 3'UTRs of Ciona intestinalis mRNA and source supporting the data.

3'UTR (nt)

PolyA signal

N° clones/total

EST tissues

  

Sequence

Position

3'RACE

EST

 

1

37

AAUAcA

-15

1/23

  

2

118

-

 

1/23

  

3

283

AAUcAA

-44

1/23

  

4

323

AcUAAA

-15

2/23

  

5

370

AAUAcA

-17

15/23

4/6

h, g, b, cl

6

496

-

 

0/23

2/6

eg, tb

7

744

AAgAAA

-18

2/23

  

8

1018

AAUAAA

-10

1/23

  

Lower case letters in the polyadenylation signal indicate differences from the canonical AAUAAA sequence. The position is the distance of the last base of the hexamer from the polyA start site, indicated as position 0. Tissue abbreviations: b: blood cells; cl: cleavage stage embryo; eg: egg; g: gonad; h: heart; tb: tailbud embryo. EST clones are detailed in Additional file 3.

All identified alternative 3'UTRs, together with the last 138 bp of the CDS of the C. intestinalis transcripts, are encoded by the last coding exon (61th exon).

No significant similarity to the C. intestinalis 3'UTR was found in the C. savignyi genomic scaffold containing the htt CDS, nor in the remaining genomic sequences, preventing the prediction of C. savignyi 3'UTR by similarity criteria. Moreover, there are no significant similarities between Ciona UTRs and the homologous regions of vertebrates [11, 15, 28, 29] and Drosophila melanogaster [16].

As expected from the high level of polymorphism revealed by C. intestinalis genomic sequences [30], a number of positions with nucleotide differences were found in both the CDS and UTR of the sequenced transcript. In the CDS we identified a total of 76 polymorphic positions, with nucleotide differences resulting in synonymous (72%) and non-synonymous substitutions (28%, mostly conservative amino acid changes); in the UTRs both nucleotide substitutions and indels were found. Nucleotide differences were also observed between our sequences obtained by RT-PCR and data obtained by re-sequencing of publicly available EST clones (see Additional file Table S1), further confirming a high level of sequence polymorphism in this species. The observed pattern of nucleotide differences is in accordance with the evolutionary dynamics of coding and non-coding sequences, suggesting that such nucleotide differences are genuine polymorphisms.

Protein analysis

The percentage of amino acid (aa) differences between all pairs of the eleven analysed chordate proteins are reported in Table 2. The sequence divergence between C. intestinalis and C. savignyi is as high as 27.95%, although these species belong to the same genus. This value is surprisingly high, particularly compared to the pairwise aa differences observed among vertebrates. Indeed, the divergence between pufferfishes belonging to the same family of Tetraodontidae (Tetraodon and Fugu) is only 4.97%, and that between mammals of the same order (mouse and rat) is as low as 2.86% (Table 2). On the contrary, the distance observed between the two Ciona species is comparable to that observed between mammals and fishes. The evolutionary tree based on amino acid data confirms the high divergence between the two Ciona species, and suggests the existence of long branches for these species (Figure 2).
Table 2

Uncorrected amino acid distances, calculated as average number of differences per 100 amino acids, for all pairwise comparisons of aligned proteins.

 

Species

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

1

Homo

9.10

8.74

11.47

15.56

20.61

26.21

26.80

26.86

63.17

63.98

2

Rattus

-

2.86

13.05

17.21

21.78

27.26

27.96

28.19

63.31

63.93

3

Mus

 

-

12.75

17.07

21.74

27.16

27.64

27.87

63.40

63.95

4

Sus

  

-

18.46

23.75

27.90

28.19

28.23

63.15

63.56

5

Gallus

   

-

19.21

24.59

25.39

25.11

63.00

63.83

6

Xenopus

    

-

26.54

27.13

27.31

63.18

63.71

7

Danio

     

-

18.13

17.81

62.55

63.60

8

Tetraodon

      

-

4.97

63.64

64.23

9

Fugu

       

-

63.48

64.17

10

C. intestinalis

        

-

27.95

11

C. savignyi

         

-

Figure 2

Bayesian phylogenetic tree of huntingtin, reconstructed from protein sequences. Branch lengths are proportional to the number of substitutions per site. Numbers close to the nodes represent Bayesian posterior probabilities.

The huntingtin proteins of C. intestinalis and C. savignyi are 2945 and 2946 aa long respectively, notably shorter than their vertebrate homologs, which are 3130 aa long on average. This length difference can be mostly ascribed to insertions/deletions in the N-terminal region of the protein (aa 1–1140 of the protein alignment, see Methods). Moreover, the N-terminal regions of both Ciona proteins lack the polyQ domain, or any kind of simple repeat (see Additional file 1). Even the proline-rich region typical of mammalian huntingtin is absent. A single histidine (C. intestinalis) or tyrosine (C. savignyi) residue is located at a position corresponding to the vertebrate polyQ stretch, suggesting low selective constraints acting on this region in the ascidian protein.

A total of 8 HEAT repeats (Table 3) are present in both the C. intestinalis and C. savignyi huntingtins. These are located as tandem arrays or as single elements in the N-terminal (4 repeats), central (2 repeats), and C-terminal (2 repeats) protein regions (each defined as one-third of the chordate protein alignment, see Methods). In human huntingtin, a total of 15 HEAT repeats are present, mostly clustered as tandem repeats in the N-terminal region (10 repeats, see Table 3). The analysis of htt protein alignment shows that all four ascidian HEAT repeats located in the N-terminal region and one repeat of the central region are also conserved in the same positions in the human homolog, whereas the HEAT repeats of the C-terminal region appear to be lineage-specific (Table 3). Thus, the presence of HEAT repeats at the N-terminal region seems to be an ancestral chordate character, further expanded in mammals. Finally, comparing the location of HEAT repeats to the gene exon boundaries, we found no indications that HEAT-repeats are encoded by single exons in either human or ascidians (data not shown). Thus, the protein domain structure does not correspond to the gene structure, at least with respect to the HEAT domains.
Table 3

Ascidian and human HEAT repeats mapped on the protein sequence of the corresponding species.

Species

HEAT name

REP E-value

Htt region

Location

Sequence

C. intestinalis

     
 

A1

0.0005

N-term

58–96

PGLLAVSVETLLQSCADDNADVRLNANECLNRLIKGLYE

 

A2

5.96E-06

N-term

139–177

RPYILNLLPCLCRISQREEDGVQETLGLSLVKIFKILGP

 

A3

1.35E-06

N-term

181–219

ESEIQGLLASFLKNLSHKSATMRRTACVCLHSVILNCRK

 

B4

6.19E-06

N-term

682–720

QSLSHQALSIALKCLCDDDLRLRKTAAATIVTMPTSFPT

 

c

2.30E-06

Central

867–905

SQQQFGILPFVMSLLHSAWLPLDVTAHSDALVLAGNLVA

 

E1

1.26E-06

Central

1341–1378

QGSASHVIPAMQPIIHDI.YVVRASSKNEPPEVTTQREV

 

g1

9.05E-06

C-term

2771–2809

ARVMSKVLPSMLDDFFPAQDIMNKIIAEFISTLQPFPAS

 

g2

1.46E-06

C-term

2864–2904

NRWISSMVPLIISRVHDPTLDVDWTCFCKAAVDFYTCQLSE

C. savignyi

     
 

A1

2.92E-07

N-term

58–96

PGLLAVSVETLLQSCADENADVRLNSNECLNRVIKGLYD

 

A2

0.0001

N-term

139–177

RPYILNLLPCLCRISQREEDAVQEVLSSSLAKIFIVLGA

 

A3

2.52E-06

N-term

181–219

ESEIQGLLASFLKNLSHKSPTVRRTACICLHSILTNSRK

 

B4

1.53E-06

N-term

692–730

KSIAQKALSIALECLCDEDTRLRKTSSAAIVSMATSYPT

 

c

1.46E-06

Central

876–914

AQQQFGILPIVMSLLRSAWLPLDVTAHSDALVLAGNLIA

 

E1

-

Central

1352–1389

QGSASHVIPAMQPITHDI.FVVRGSLKNEPPEVTTQREV

 

g1

1.27E-06

C-term

2770–2808

ARVMSKILPSMLDDFFPAQEIMNKIIAEFISTLQPFPGS

 

g2

-

C-term

2864–2903

RWISSMVPLIISRSHDPSLDRNWTCFCKSAVDFYTCQLSE

Homo sapiens

     
 

A1

4.75E-07

N-term

124–162

QKLLGIAMELFLLCSDDAESDVRMVADECLNKVIKALMD

 

A2

0.0001

N-term

205–243

RPYLVNLLPCLTRTSKRPEESVQETLAAAVPKIMASFGN

 

A3

5.48E-07

N-term

247–285

DNEIKVLLKAFIANLKSSSPTIRRTAAGSAVSICQHSRR

 

a4

*

N-term

291–329

SWLLNVLLGLLVPVEDEHSTLLILGVLLTLRYLVPLLQQ

 

a5

7.77E-06

N-term

318–362

LTLRYLVPLLQQQVKDTSLKGSFGVTRKEMEVSPSAEQLVQVYEL

 

b1

*

N-term

745–783

EYPEEQYVSDILNYIDHGDPQVRGATAILCGTLICSILS

 

b2

1.04E-06

N-term

803–841

TFSLADCIPLLRKTLKDESSVTSKLACTAVRNCVMSLCS

 

b3

*

N-term

842–880

SSYSELGLQLIIDVLTLRNSSYWLVRTELLETLAEIDFR

 

B4

6.69E-08

N-term

904–942

KLQERVLNNVVIHLLGDEDPRVRHVAAASLIRLVPKLFY

 

b5

9.05E-06

N-term

984–1025

RIYRGYNLLPSITDVTMENNLSRVIAAVSHELITSTTRALTF

 

d

5.62E-06

Central

1425–1463

RLFEPLVIKALKQYTTTTCVQLQKQVLDLLAQLVQLRVN

 

E1

*

Central

1534–1575

RKAVTHAIPALQPIVHDLFVLRGTNKADAGKELETQKEVVVS

 

e2

*

Central

1610–1648

RQIADIILPMLAKQQMHIDSHEALGVLNTLFEILAPSSL

 

e3

*

Central

1670–1710

TVQLWISGILAILRVLISQSTEDIVLSRIQELSFSPYLISC

 

f

3.51E-06

C-term

2798–2836

DDTAKQLIPVISDYLLSNLKGIAHCVNIHSQQHVLVMCA

HEAT repeats are named according to their relative position along the chordate aligned sequences, using the same letter for repeats closer than 45 amino acids. Orthologous HEAT repeats conserved in ascidians and human share the same name, and are reported in upper case. The Expectation values (E-value) was calculated by the REP program [62]. Htt regions defined as in Methods. Absolute position of the HEAT repeats in the corresponding protein sequence is reported in the "Location" column. Dash: REP E-value not statistically significant. Asterisk: HEAT repeats originally described in Andrade and Bork [18] but not identified by the REP program as statistically significant [62].

Gene structure comparison

The structure and size of chordate huntingtin genes (only CDS) are summarized in Table 4 and Figure 3. The coding region of C. intestinalis htt gene consists of 61 coding exons with length varying from 46 (exon 9) to 376 bp (exon 8) and a mean of 145 ± 55 bp (see Additional file 2). Introns account for 73% of the gene (Table 4). All introns are flanked by the canonical GT-AG consensus splice site and interrupt the coding sequence in all three possible phases. Phase 0 introns are the most abundant, with an approximate ratio of 3:1:1 for introns with phase 0, 1 and 2, respectively. The two alternative introns 50, due to the presence of a competing 5' splice site in exon 50 (Figure 1), share the same phase (1), and both follow the GT-AG rule. Such an alternative 5' splice site can be also predicted in C. savignyi (Figure 1), with the two alternative introns conserving phase 1 and canonical consensus splicing sites as in C. intestinalis.
Table 4

Chordata huntingtin gene structure, coding region (CDS), and length percentage of repetitive elements (Rpt) in intronic sequences.

  

Exon N°

Length (bp)

Intron L %

   

CDS

Gene

Introns

Rpt

Simple

Interspers

Retroel

DNA el

Mammalia

Homo sapiens

67

9432

165202

155770

38.5

1.3

37.2

33.9

2.2

 

Mus musculus

67

9357

146932

137575

38.2

1.9

36.2

34.7

0.5

 

Rattus norvegicus

67

9351

145591 p

136240 p

35.4

2.6

32.9

31.3

0.9

Aves

Gallus gallus

67

9351

73424 p

64073 p

5.5

0.6

4.9

4.9

0

Amphibia

Xenopus tropicalis

67

9066 p

79087 p

70021 p

11.0

0.9

10.0

0

9.3

Teleostei

Danio rerio

67

9363

79017 p

69654 p

29.9

5.3

24.6

4.3

20.3

 

Fugu rubripes

67

9444

21324

11880

1.1

1.1

0

0

0

 

Tetraodon nigridoviridis

67

9435

22257

12822

2.4

1.8

0.5

0

0.5

Ascidiacea

Ciona savignyi

61

8835

45085

36249

9.8

2.7

7.1

4.4

2.1

 

Ciona intestinalis

61

8838

32283

23445

12.5

5.8

6.7

1.6

5.1

Simple: satellites, simple repeats, low complexity repeats and small RNAs. Interspers: interspersed repeats. Retroel: retroelements. DNA el: DNA elements. p: partial sequence. Partial introns in Rattus: 1, 8, 28. Partial introns in Gallus: 46, 47. Partial or unknown exons in Xenopus: 27, 37, 66. Partial or unknown introns in Xenopus: 9, 26, 27, 36, 37, 65, 66. Partial introns in Danio: 1, 6, 8, 11, 13, 18, 25, 44, 49, 59. Intron 61 of Danio was excluded from gene size calculation due to its length (about 254 kb).

Figure 3

Comparison of huntingtin gene structure between Ciona intestinalis (upper line) and Homo sapiens (lower line). Only protein-coding regions are indicated. Exons are represented by boxes, with upper numbers indicating exon numbering and inner number indicating exon length (in bp). Box size is unrelated to exon length. Square bracket: exon-block (see text). Yellow box: equivalent exon (see text). Gray box: exon belonging to an exon-block (see text). Introns positionally conserved in the two species are represented by dashed lines, in black for identical intron position, in red for slipped position (changes ≤ 18 bp). Intron phase is reported between dashed lines as a single number if common to the two species. Boxed phase number indicates that intron phase is not conserved in one vertebrate species (see text). Blue boxes below or above the gene structure indicate exons with length differences > 12 bp in vertebrates (below) or in the Ciona genus (above). Letters inside blue boxes indicates the species where the size difference is observed: M, difference between mammals and other-vertebrates; NM, difference within non-mammalian vertebrates; F, difference between fishes and other-vertebrates; G, difference only in Gallus. Arrows indicate the 5% longest introns in at least one vertebrate species (below), and in the Ciona genus (above). AS: alternative splicing experimentally identified in C. intestinalis. PuAS: putative alternative splicing identified "in silico" in Gallus, Xenopus and pufferfishes. Sp: presence of lineage-specific sequences only in non-mammalian species (SpNM) or only in Ciona (SpC).

The gene structure of the two Ciona species is almost identical (Figure 3 and Additional file 2): introns interrupt the CDS at identical amino acid positions and also in the same phase (only introns 34 and 41 have slipped six nucleotides). Similarly, orthologous exons are of consistently similar size, with substantial length differences (Δ L > 12 bp) found only in exon 8, and exon 50 (upper blue boxes in gene structure of Figure 3). Interestingly, exon 8 covers the less conserved region of ascidian huntingtin (57% local against a 72% overall amino acid similarity) and exon 50 is involved in the alternative splicing event.

The htt gene structure is perfectly conserved in the eight vertebrate species analysed, from fishes to amphibians and mammals, and consists of 67 exons (Table 4 and Figure 3). Introns are conserved in the same phase and identically positioned in all species, with few exceptions (intron 27 has slipped 19 bp in Gallus, and intron 34 has slipped 2 bp in Tetraodon. In both cases a phase change is observed compared to the remaining vertebrate genes). As in Ciona, phase 0 introns are the most abundant, with an approximate ratio of 2:1:1 for introns with phase 0, 1 and 2, respectively. Exon size is also highly conserved between vertebrates and ranges from 45–48 bp (exon 10) to 341–392 bp (exon 12), with a mean value of 140 ± 52 bp (see Additional file 2). Therefore, orthologous exons have almost identical size, and those with ΔL > 12 bp (lower blue boxes in gene structure of Figure 3) can be classified in three groups depending on the source of size variability:

• size differences between mammals and remaining vertebrates: exons 1 and 24 (indicated with M in Figure 3);

• size differences among non-mammalian vertebrates: exon 12 (indicated with NM in Figure 3);

• size differences between (one or more) fishes and remaining vertebrates: exons 25, 26, 39, 51 and 63 (indicated with F in Figure 3);

• intron sliding: the slippage of intron 27 in Gallus produces length variation of flanking exons in this species compared to other vertebrates but the overall amino acid length in this region is conserved (indicated with G in Figure 3).

In most cases, exon size variability reflects a propensity of the corresponding encoded protein region to accept multiple amino acid insertions/deletions: the extreme situation is found in exon 1, with the presence/absence and the length variability of the polyQ and polyP stretches. More interesting is the case of exon 24, which contains an additional 3'end portion encoding for 15–18 amino acids only in non-mammalian vertebrates. Similarly, length variation in exon 63 is found only in Danio and is due to 6 additional amino acids encoded by the 3'end of this exon.

Figure 3 reports the result of a comparison of the htt gene structure between ascidians and vertebrates, using Ciona and Homo as representative species. As many as 39 introns are positionally conserved in all chordates, exactly in the same position (30 introns, shown in black dashed lines in Figure 3), or slipped by at most 18 bp (9 introns, shown in red dashed lines in Figure 3). Moreover, 32 positionally conserved introns share the same phase (27 exact positioned introns, and 5 slipped introns). Thus, most shared chordate introns are conserved with respect to both position and phase, with a prevalence of phase 0 introns (ratio 18:8:6 for shared introns with phase 0, 1 and 2, respectively). The existence of common-chordate introns allows us to define:

• 23 "equivalent" exons, as orthologous exons whose sequence can be perfectly aligned over their entire length in all chordates (yellow exons in Figure 3);

• 17 exon-blocks, as groups of exons delimited by positionally conserved introns and containing lineage-specific introns, differently located in vertebrates compared to Ciona (grey exons grouped by square brackets in Figure 3).

Thus, the equivalent exons represent 38% and 34% of the total htt exon number of Ciona and vertebrates, respectively. Although the total number of exons is higher in vertebrates than in Ciona, there are 5 exon-blocks where one exon in vertebrates corresponds to two exons in Ciona but only one exon-block with the opposite pattern, suggesting that intron gains and losses have occurred in both lineages. The distribution of shared-chordate introns along the gene indicates that the 5'-terminal region of the huntingtin was more prone to taxon-specific intron gain/loss compared to the remaining regions. Indeed, there are only 8 shared-chordate introns in the 5'-terminal region, against 16 in the central region and 15 in the 3'-terminal region. Consequently, equivalent exons are quite limited in the 5'-terminal compared to the remaining regions of the gene (number of equivalent exons in the three regions 4:10:9) (see Figure 3).

The comparison of Ciona and vertebrate gene structure reveals the presence of two lineage-specific coding regions:

• in exon-block B_50_51, the Ciona sequence including the 3' end of exon 50 (long-isoform) plus the 5' end of exon 51 is absent in the central region of the orthologous vertebrate exon 58 (Figure 1), suggesting that the corresponding encoded protein region was lost by vertebrates or acquired by ascidians;

• exon 16 of Ciona encodes an amino acid sequence also present in non-mammalian vertebrates, where it is encoded by the end of exon 24 and the beginning of exon 25 (see Figure 3). Given its presence in Ciona and basal vertebrates, this sequence was most likely lost in mammals.

The existence of a possible correlation between gene structure conservation and protein conservation was examined by calculating the percentage amino acid identity (% aa id) for each gene structural element shared by all chordates, that is equivalent exons and exon-blocks identified in Figure 3. Figure 4 reports the % aa identity for equivalent exons (E, in yellow) and exon-blocks (B, in gray) along the protein alignment, together with the mean % aa identity of the entire alignment (21.2 ± 7.1, bold dashed line in Figure 4). Equivalent exons are almost equally distributed above and below the mean % aa id, however the less conserved elements correspond to exon-blocks (B_8_9 and B_40_42), and the most conserved elements are equivalent exons (E_27, E_28, E_46, E_58 and E_59). Moreover, the most conserved equivalent exons belong to clusters of consecutive equivalent exons, indicative of a high conservation of gene structure, and are located in the central and C-terminal protein regions (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Percentage amino acid identity calculated for each Equivalent exon (E, in yellow) and exon-Block (B, in gray). The percentage amino acid identity was calculated from the chordate protein alignment for each of the equivalent exons and exon-blocks described in Figure 1. Numbers refer to the Ciona exon numbering. Bold-dashed line represents the mean % identity (21.2%) calculated over the entire alignment length. Normal-dashed lines represent mean value +/- standard deviation (7.1).

With regard to sequence conservation, a significant inverse correlation was found between % aa id and % gaps calculated separately for each gene structural element (R2 = 0.416; data not shown), denoting that protein regions with a higher tendency to accumulate amino acid substitutions have also a higher tendency to accept insertions/deletions.

Intron analysis

As shown in Table 5, intron length is highly variable within species. Generally, intron size does not correlate across species, and significant linear correlation between length of orthologous introns is found only in the species pairs Fugu-Tetraodon (R2 = 0.65), Xenopus-Gallus (R2 = 0.32) and within mammals (R2= 0.29–0.46) (values calculated excluding partial intron sequences).
Table 5

Length variability of huntingtin introns.

 

Median

Average

Min

Max

First intron

95-th percentile

Homo sapiens

1549

2360

93

12251

11850

9949

Mus musculus

1164

2084

92

20632

20632

6828

Rattus norvegicus

1146

2064

92

14532

14532

5970

Gallus gallus

743

971

85

5285

5285

2569

Xenopus tropicalis

831

1096

77

7186

7186

2849

Danio rerio

538

1091

73

4946

4891

3962

Fugu rubripes

105

180

66

1274

537

528

Tetraodon nigridoviridis

111

194

72

1264

781

736

Ciona savignyi

569

604

122

1933

331

1119

Ciona intestinalis

319

391

55

3038

257

616

The first intron is the longest intron in four of the eight vertebrate species (Table 5). Using a threshold to define unusually large introns (see Methods), the longest introns are mostly clustered in three regions of the vertebrate gene: two regions located at the 5' end of the gene (introns 1–3, and introns 9–12) and one region at the beginning of the central portion (introns 24–29, excluding intron 27) (arrows in Figure 3). In each of these regions, at least 6 of the 8 analysed vertebrate species contain an unusually large intron. On the contrary, there are no common gene regions where long introns cluster in both Ciona species (arrows indicated with "Ci" and "Cs" in Figure 3). Moreover, no correspondence between regions with longest introns in ascidians and vertebrates is observed (Figure 3).

A search for sequence similarities in intronic regions does not identify conserved sequence tags (CSTs) between the two Ciona species, nor between vertebrates and ascidians. On the contrary, intron 12 of vertebrates contains interesting CSTs in more than one species pair (Figure 5). Indeed, CSTs ranging from 102 to 177 bp were found in intron 12 in the species pairs Xenopus-Gallus, Tetraodon-Fugu, and Mus-Rattus. The Xenopus-Gallus CST has a high coding potential (CPS = 7.16) [31], whereas the Tetraodon-Fugu CST exhibits a marginal coding potential (CPS = 6.77), and the rodent CST is clearly non-coding, as indicated by a low CPS value (5.89). Moreover, the Xenopus-Gallus CST shows 34% amino acid sequence similarity to the CST of pufferfishes but no similarity to the rodent CST. The presence of a coding sequence in intron 12 is further confirmed by the prediction of a competing 5' splice site in exon 12 of Xenopus and Gallus, and of an internal cassette exon (that we called exon 12bis) in the two pufferfish species (SGP2 results), with all new putative introns following the GT-AG rule. This coding region, present only in some non-mammalian vertebrates and showing a low amino acid similarity (Figure 5), suggests the existence of an alternative splicing isoform due to a species-specific additional or longer exon located in intron 12.
Figure 5

Amino acid alignment of CSTs found in intron 12. The Conserved Sequence Tag (CST) corresponds to an internal cassette exon (12Bis) in non-mammalian tetrapods and to a longest splicing isoform of exon 12 (12L) in pufferfishes. Identical, similar and conserved positions are indicated with different background.

Gene size and repetitive elements

The variability of gene size between species is essentially due to changes in intron size (Table 4), which in turn correlate well with the overall nuclear genome size of the species considered. The total intron size increases proportionally with the overall percentage of repeated elements in introns (R2 = 0.92) but a linear correlation between intron size and gene size still exists when intron length without repetitive elements is considered (R2 = 0.95).

As shown in Table 4, repetitive elements cover a high and similar fraction of introns in all mammals, and a small fraction of the two pufferfish introns. The two species of Ciona show a similar fraction of repeated elements (9.8 – 12.5%), which is almost one-third of the mammalian repetitive intron fraction. A strong prevalence of interspersed is observed in all vertebrates, except for the pufferfish, whereas in the two ascidians interspersed repeats represent almost the same or more than twice the percentage of simple repeats (in C. savignyi and C. intestinalis, respectively) (Table 4). Among interspersed repeats, retroelements are more abundant than DNA elements in mammals and C. savignyi, whereas the opposite situation is observed in Xenopus, Danio and C. intestinalis.

Overall, the two Ciona species show a quite different distribution of repeats among classes, a situation rather surprising when compared with the similar repeat distribution observed between Fugu and Tetraodon and even between human and rodents.

No conservation of repetitive elements in orthologous introns in all or most analysed species is observed (data not shown). In Ciona, ten orthologous introns contain short low complexity repeats in both species (length < 70 bp), but there are no orthologous introns containing an interspersed repeat of the same class/family in both species.

Discussion

Genomic data exclude the presence of paralogs of the huntingtin gene in the genus Ciona, as in both species the transcript sequence significantly matches only one genomic scaffold (or several scaffolds match different regions of the transcript, see Methods). The full-length huntingtin transcript of C. intestinalis shows several interesting features, such as SL trans-splicing, multiple polyadenylation sites, and alternative splicing involving the coding sequence.

The extent of SL trans-splicing has been recently investigated in C. intestinalis, revealing the esistence of polycistronic transcription units, and that about 50% of the total number of expressed genes are trans-spliced in this species [32]. A database search using the C. intestinalis SL sequence as a probe reveals that several full-length mRNAs and cDNA clones of C. savignyi also starts with the same SL sequence (data not shown). Considering that the trans-splicing status of individual genes is often evolutionary conserved in related species [25, 33, 34], we can speculate that the htt transcript is also SL trans-spliced in C. savignyi and in the larvacean Oikopleura dioica, a tunicate where about 12–24% of mRNAs are trans-spliced [35]. The SL trans-splicing found in Ciona htt could be responsible for specific mechanisms of post-transcriptional gene regulation different from those observed in vertebrates. Indeed, the 5'UTR of mammalian htt mRNA contains a conserved uORF that inhibits the translation of the downstream huntingtin ORF, at least in human [28]. uORFs are also present in the 5'UTR of the two Ciona species (only predicted in C. savignyi) but they are not conserved in either position or in sequence, so their functional significance is not obvious.

The htt transcript shows eight alternative polyA sites, mostly associated with polyA signals located at the expected position (10–30 nt upstream to the polyA tail), and with a sequence corresponding to one of the ten identified single-base variants of the AAUAAA vertebrate polyA signal [36] (Table 1). Moreover, the last polyA signal shows exactly the canonical AAUAAA sequence, in accordance with the observation that mRNAs with multiple polyA sites tend to use variant signals in the region proximal to the CDS, and a canonical AAUAAA at the 3'-most distal site [36]. The absence of and/or anomalies of three polyA signals can be ascribed to the existence of species-specific polyA signals, or to a radically different polyadenylation mechanism, as already suggested for human transcripts [36].

An alternative splicing event involving the CDS was fortuitously identified as being expressed in ovarian tissue. Since alternatively spliced isoforms were not specifically sought by our experimental strategy, we cannot exclude the existence of other transcript isoforms. EST data do not help in the identification of alternatively spliced isoforms but suggest an almost ubiquitous and low expression level of the htt gene in C. intestinalis (see Additional file 3), similar to observations in vertebrate and invertebrate species [16, 17].

Overall, the maturation of the huntingtin transcript in this ancient chordate involves several processes, commonly reported as mechanisms of fine regulation of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. Some of these processes are conserved even in vertebrates, and would indicate ancestral mechanisms of gene regulation. This is true for the alternative polyadenylation [1114, 29], and even for alternative splicing. Indeed, hints that alternative splicing occurs in vertebrate huntingtin may be gleaned from the literature [10, 11], and our comparative analyses have highlighted the possible existence of a species-specific alternative splicing in some vertebrate species (Figure 5).

The exon-intron organization of the huntingtin gene is highly conserved in the two subphyla of Vertebrata and Tunicata. Previous studies on the exon-intron structure of small genes reported an almost invariant gene structure in vertebrates [3740], and a hypervariability of intron position in the tunicate larvacean Oikopleura compared to both vertebrates and other tunicates, suggesting also a variability of gene structure within tunicates [40].

Here, we show that the exon-intron structure of a large gene, huntingtin, is almost identical between the two Ciona species and highly conserved between Ciona and vertebrates, with about 36% of the exons exactly conserved in both taxa. Assuming that introns in the same positions of orthologous genes are ancestral, the htt gene of the common ancestor of chordates should have contained at least the 39 introns positionally conserved in both Ciona and vertebrates (Figure 3). However, a more comprehensive reconstruction of the ancestral chordate gene structure will require the analysis of additional species, such as sea urchins, lancelet and other tunicates.

Splitting the gene into three regions, it appears that the 3'-terminal region was highly conserved in all chordates at level of gene structure, whereas the 5'-terminal was less conserved during chordate diversification (Figure 3), probably because of a relaxation or a modification of selective constraints. Indeed, the 5'-terminal region presents the lowest number of shared introns, and several slipped exons and intron phase changes, suggesting multiple events of intron gain/loss (Figure 3). In vertebrates, the longest introns are again concentrated in the 5'-terminal and the beginning of the central region of the gene, avoiding regions with high conservation of gene structure (Figure 3). Thus, we can hypothesize that the 3'-terminal gene region might have a low propensity to accept new sequences or intron expansions, because of the constraints to preserve specific functional elements. Finally, the 5'-terminal of the gene contains the less conserved exon-block (B_8_9), characterized by high variability at level of both structure (Figure 3) and sequence (Figure 4), and by the presence of a possible lineage-specific alternative splicing (Figure 5). Another lineage-specific sequence, lost in mammalian species, is located at the beginning of the central region (exon 16 of Ciona, corresponding to exons 24–25 of vertebrates), suggesting a trend to a lineage-specific evolution in the first portion of the vertebrate gene.

Introns are arranged independently of the predicted HEAT domains of the protein in both vertebrates and ascidians. According to the exon-shuffling theory [41], protein domains should correlate with the borders of their coding exons, particularly in protein categories functionally linked to organism multicellularity, such as extracellular and membrane proteins mediating cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions [42]. Although in huntingtin there is no indication of a correlation between the boundaries of HEAT domains and their coding exons, we can not exclude the existence of a correlation between the structure of the gene and the unknown domain structure of the protein.

As shown in Figure 4, only a weak correlation was found between sequence and gene structure conservation. This observation is in accordance with the result of a recent large-scale study on gene structure evolution in 11 deeply diverging animals species, showing that changes in exon-intron structure are gradual and largely, although not completely, independent of protein sequence evolution [43].

The htts of the two Ciona species show several striking differences: the amino acid divergence is similar to that observed between mammals and fishes (Table 2); the experimentally identified 5'- and 3'-UTRs of C. intestinalis did not allow the determination of the homologous UTRs C. savignyi by similarity criteria; a different distribution of repetitive elements among classes is found between the two species (Table 4); no orthologous introns contain interspersed repeats of the same class/family. Finally, there is no correlation between orthologous intron size of the two Ciona species, whereas a statistically significant correlation has been found between closely related species showing low CDS sequence divergence. All such data are in accordance with the considerable differences observed between the two Ciona species in the mitochondrial genome [44] and in nuclear coding and non-coding sequences [45], and suggest a high evolutionary rate or a ancient origin of the two Ciona species.

Conclusion

Our comparative analyses of the huntingtin gene suggest that the 5'-terminal and the beginning of the central region of the gene were exposed to lower functional constrains during chordate evolution and underwent major changes at level of exon-intron organization, primary sequence, and intron size, with probable modification of the ancestral function or acquisition of new functions in vertebrates compared to ascidians. Thus, it is likely that the remaining central and 3'-terminal regions of the gene are those encoding for domains playing the ancestral gene function, shared by all chordates, and thus represent the ancestral traits of the huntingtin gene. In addition, the htt gene history suggests a high evolutionary rate of Ciona species compared to vertebrates and/or an early divergence time between the two Ciona species. These observations, derived from a single but highly informative gene, should stimulate further evolutionary studies of the Ciona genus.

Methods

Amplification and sequencing of huntingtin mRNA

A similarity search of the EST database by TBLASTN [46] identified 9 Ciona intestinalis EST clones significantly similar to the C-terminal region of human huntingtin (see Additional file 3). Moreover, one EST clone of Ciona savignyi matching to the N-terminal region of the protein was identified in the final stage of our work (Additional file 3). All clones were kindly provided by Dr. N. Satoh and Y. Satou, and were completely re-sequenced using universal and walking primers. In parallel, a first "in silico" gene prediction using the C. intestinalis genome assembly v1.0 (the one available at the time of the analyses), allowed the identification of five non-overlapping scaffolds partially containing the gene. All the sequence data obtained were used to define the experimental strategy to amplify and sequence the full-length cDNA sequence of C. intestinalis.

Total RNA was extracted from the ovary of two C. intestinalis individuals from the Stazione Zoologica of Naples, using the Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After treatment of the isolated RNA with amplification grade DNase I, (Invitrogen), RT-PCR was carried out using the SuperScript™ III First Strand System (Invitrogen), and random hexamers to prime cDNA synthesis. Gene-specific primers, available on request, were all designed in different exons. The cDNA amplification strategy is schematically reported in Additional file 4: the transcript was amplified in seven fragments ranging in size from 1.1 kb to 1.9 kb, with overlapping sequences of at least 188 bp. Depending on yield and quality, the amplified fragments were directly sequenced after purification using Microcon-PCR Filter Centrifugal Devices (Amicon) or alternatively were cloned into pCR 2.1-TOPO vector using TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen) and then sequenced (MWG Sequencing Service). 5' and 3' RACE were performed using the First Choice RLM-RACE kit (Ambion), following the manufacturer's protocol. In the 5' RACE random decamers were used for cDNA synthesis. An outer gene-specific reverse primer located in exon 5 and a nested primer located in exon 4 were used for amplification, obtaining a fragment of about 0.5 kb as product of the nested PCR. For the 3'RACE, the gene specific-outer primer (4 hF) was located in exon 53, and the inner primer (3 hF) was located in exon 54 obtaining multiple fragments ranging from about 1 to 1.8 kb. Products of 5' and 3'RACE were all cloned into pCR 2.1-TOPO vector using TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen). Four positive 5'RACE clones and 23 positive 3'RACE clones were completely sequenced.

The C. intestinalis full-length mRNA sequence was deposited at the EMBL data bank under the accession number AM162277.

Sequence analyses

The htt protein sequences of vertebrates extracted from Swiss-Prot, TrEMBL and REFSEQ databases (see Additional file 5) were refined using genomic data, and similarity criteria to experimentally well-characterized huntingtin proteins. In particular, protein sequences reported in the original database entry as "predicted" (such as those of Gallus, Xenopus, and Tetraodon) were carefully checked and extensively modified merging the initial sequence data to protein predictions obtained from GenScan [47, 48] and GenomeScan [49, 50] programs. The GenomeScan program was carried out incorporating information on htt proteins experimentally identified in closely related species (i.e. Fugu protein information was used for Tetraodon gene prediction). In addition, regions of original "predicted" entries with no significant similarity to other proteins or to ESTs of the same species (as defined by Blast analyses at [46]) were excluded from the final version of the protein prediction. The SGP2 program[51] was also used to optimize gene prediction in closely related species. SGP2 predicts genes by pairwise comparisons of genomic sequences, combining the tBlastx sequence similarity search and the Geneid "ab initio" gene prediction program [52].

The most recent genome assembly was used for the prediction of htt gene structure and protein sequence in vertebrates, except in the case of Danio rerio. For this species the genome assembly v4 was preferred to the up-to-date assembly v5 (May 2005), due to the presence in v5 of three genomic regions repeated in tandem in chromosome 1, each matching partially or entirely the experimentally determined transcript of this species [15]. On the contrary, in the genome assembly v4, only one genomic region, also located in chromosome 1, matches the huntingtin transcript of Danio.

All available genome assembly versions were used to reliably predict the htt gene structure and protein sequence in the two Ciona species (see Additional file 5), and an accurate comparison of the obtained results was carried out. The protein and gene structure prediction obtained from v1 and v2 assemblies of C. savignyi were identical, except for length and sequence of few introns. As regards Ciona intestinalis, in the assembly v2.0 the sequence of chromosome 5 matching the experimental htt transcript shows duplications and transpositions of some regions, whereas in the assembly v1.95 almost the entire htt transcript matches consistently the sequence of a single scaffold. Taking into account only the reliable region of the htt sequence identified in the v2.0 assembly, the gene structure obtained from the two assemblies of C. intestinalis was identical, except for the length of few introns and the lack of the last 400 nt of the longest 3'UTR in the v1.95 assembly.

In order to determine the exact exon-intron organization of the genes, the Gmap program [53, 54] was used for mapping and aligning a given cDNA and/or coding sequence to the corresponding genomic sequence.

Protein alignment was performed with CLUSTAL W ver. 1.82 [55], and manually revised in an effort to maximize positional homology. The equivalent nucleotide (nt) alignment "back-aligned" from the protein data was also prepared (see Additional file 6). The chordate huntingtin alignment is 3420 amino acid (aa) long. In most analyses we considered the htt gene and protein split into three regions, each corresponding to one/third of the total alignment length, that is:

• N-terminal or 5'-terminal: protein alignment region 1–1140 (aa 1–839 and exons 1–15 of C. intestinalis, homologous to aa 1–1050 and exons 1–24 of human);

• central: protein alignment region 1141–2280 (aa 840–1882 and exons 16–38 of C. intestinalis, homologous to aa 1051–2107 and exons 25–46 of human);

• C-terminal or 3'-terminal: protein alignment region 2281–3420 (aa 1883–2946 and exons 39–61 of C. intestinalis, homologous to aa 2108–3144 and exons 47–67 of human).

To compare gene structure among species, exon sequences were mapped onto the nt alignment and the exact position and phase of each intron was verified by manual inspection.

The percentage of amino acid identity, the percentage of gaps and the uncorrected amino acid distances, corresponding to mean character differences per 100 aa adjusted for missing data, were calculated on the optimized protein alignment using PAUP* v4.0b10 [56].

The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed analysing the Gblocks-purified [57] huntingtin protein alignment (2148 sites, corresponding to 62% of the original positions), with the Bayesian method [58]. The JTT + gamma model was selected as best model fitting to the data, according to a ProtTest analysis [59] and following the Akaike information criterion. In the Bayesian analysis, one cold and three incrementally heated chains were run for 1,000,000 generations, with trees sampled every 100 generations from the last 900,000 generated (well after chain convergence).

Searches for protein domains were performed with InterProScan [60, 61], and HEAT repeats were searched by the REP program [62, 63].

Analyses of interspersed repetitive elements were performed using the RepeatMasker program ver. 3.1.2[64], selecting for each species the proper species-specific RepBase Update 10.4 library.

Intronic regions conserved across species (Conserved Sequence Tags, CST) were detected comparing all introns of a given species (previously masked from repetitive elements) against a database containing all intron sequences of the remaining species, through Blastn and Tblastx (E value < 0.01) [65]. CSTs shorter than 30 bp and/or identified only in orthologous introns of mammalian species or only in the species pair Fugu-Tetraodon were not further analysed. Assessment of the coding nature of detected CSTs was done through the computation of a coding potential score (CPS) on the total CST and on CST sliding windows and, using the CSTminer program [66, 31]. CPS values higher than 7.71 indicate a coding potential of the related CST, and CPS values lower than 6.74 indicate noncoding CSTs, with an estimated false positive rate < 1% [31].

The 95th percentile of intron length of a given species was used as threshold to identify the longest introns of each species. Thus, introns scoring above the 95th percentile of a species were considered unusually long introns.

In silico search for experimentally-known regulatory elements in the 5' and 3' untranslate regions (UTR) of Ciona transcript was carried out using UTRScan [67, 68].

The polyadenylation signals were searched in the 3'UTR sequence using the PatSearch program [69], and looking for a one-base variant of the canonical AAUAAA sequence in the 50 bp segment upstream each experimentally identified polyadenylation site.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by COFIN projects (Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca) to CG and EC, and a FIRB project to GP. We thanks Nori Satoh, and Yutaka Satou of the Department of Zoology, Kyoto University (Japan), for kindly providing us the Ciona EST clones; Rosaria DeSantis of the Stazione Zoologica "Anton Dohrn" of Naples for the gift of C. intestinalis individuals; Roberta Pennati and Cristina Sotgia of the Department of Biology (University of Milano) for valuable suggestions on experimental protocols and Ciona handling; Flavio Mignone for help in drawing figures; David Horner for valuable comments on the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomolecolari e Biotecnologie, Università di Milano
(2)
Dipartimento di Biochimica e Biologia Molecolare, Università di Bari
(3)
Department of Pharmacological Sciences and Center of Excellence on Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Milano

References

  1. Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group: A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell. 1993, 72: 971-983. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-E.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sipione S, Cattaneo E: Modeling Huntington's disease in cells, flies, and mice. Mol Neurobiol. 2001, 23: 21-51. 10.1385/MN:23:1:21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cattaneo E, Zuccato C, Tartari M: Normal huntingtin function: an alternative approach to Huntington's disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005, 6: 919-930. 10.1038/nrm1782.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Trottier Y, Devys D, Imbert G, Saudou F, An I, Lutz Y, Weber C, Agid Y, Hirsch EC, Mandel JL: Cellular localization of the Huntington's disease protein and discrimination of the normal and mutated form. Nat Genet. 1995, 10: 104-110. 10.1038/ng0595-104.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zuccato C, Ciammola A, Rigamonti D, Leavitt BR, Goffredo D, Conti L, MacDonald ME, Friedlander RM, Silani V, Hayden MR, Timmusk T, Sipione S, Cattaneo E: Loss of huntingtin-mediated BDNF gene transcription in Huntington's disease. Science. 2001, 293: 493-498. 10.1126/science.1059581.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zuccato C, Tartari M, Crotti A, Goffredo D, Valenza M, Conti L, Cataudella T, Leavitt BR, Hayden MR, Timmusk T, Rigamonti D, Cattaneo E: Huntingtin interacts with REST/NRSF to modulate the transcription of NRSE-controlled neuronal genes. Nat Genet. 2003, 35: 76-83. 10.1038/ng1219.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gauthier LR, Charrin BC, Borrell-Pages M, Dompierre JP, Rangone H, Cordelieres FP, De Mey J, MacDonald ME, Lessmann V, Humbert S, Saudou F: Huntingtin controls neurotrophic support and survival of neurons by enhancing BDNF vesicular transport along microtubules. Cell. 2004, 118: 127-138. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gunawardena S, Her LS, Brusch RG, Laymon RA, Niesman IR, Gordesky-Gold B, Sintasath L, Bonini NM, Goldstein LS: Disruption of axonal transport by loss of huntingtin or expression of pathogenic polyQ proteins in Drosophila. Neuron. 2003, 40: 25-40. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00594-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Trushina E, Dyer RB, Badger JD, Ure D, Eide L, Tran DD, Vrieze BT, Legendre-Guillemin V, McPherson PS, Mandavilli BS, Van Houten B, Zeitlin S, McNiven M, Aebersold R, Hayden M, Parisi JE, Seeberg E, Dragatsis I, Doyle K, Bender A, Chacko C, McMurray CT: Mutant huntingtin impairs axonal trafficking in mammalian neurons in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 8195-8209. 10.1128/MCB.24.18.8195-8209.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin B, Nasir J, MacDonald H, Hutchinson G, Graham RK, Rommens JM, Hayden MR: Sequence of the murine Huntington disease gene: evidence for conservation, alternate splicing and polymorphism in a triplet (CCG) repeat [corrected]. Hum Mol Genet. 1994, 3: 85-92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Matsuyama N, Hadano S, Onoe K, Osuga H, Showguchi-Miyata J, Gondo Y, Ikeda JE: Identification and characterization of the miniature pig Huntington's disease gene homolog: evidence for conservation and polymorphism in the CAG triplet repeat. Genomics. 2000, 69: 72-85. 10.1006/geno.2000.6317.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Baxendale S, Abdulla S, Elgar G, Buck D, Berks M, Micklem G, Durbin R, Bates G, Brenner S, Beck S: Comparative sequence analysis of the human and pufferfish Huntington's disease genes. Nat Genet. 1995, 10: 67-76. 10.1038/ng0595-67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Barnes GT, Duyao MP, Ambrose CM, McNeil S, Persichetti F, Srinidhi J, Gusella JF, MacDonald ME: Mouse Huntington's disease gene homolog (Hdh). Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1994, 20: 87-97. 10.1007/BF02290678.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmitt I, Bachner D, Megow D, Henklein P, Hameister H, Epplen JT, Riess O: Expression of the Huntington disease gene in rodents: cloning the rat homologue and evidence for downregulation in non-neuronal tissues during development. Hum Mol Genet. 1995, 4: 1173-1182.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Karlovich CA, John RM, Ramirez L, Stainier DY, Myers RM: Characterization of the Huntington's disease (HD) gene homologue in the zebrafish Danio rerio. Gene. 1998, 217: 117-125. 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00342-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Z, Karlovich CA, Fish MP, Scott MP, Myers RM: A putative Drosophila homolog of the Huntington's disease gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1999, 8: 1807-1815. 10.1093/hmg/8.9.1807.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kauffman JS, Zinovyeva A, Yagi K, Makabe KW, Raff RA: Neural expression of the Huntington's disease gene as a chordate evolutionary novelty. J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol. 2003, 297: 57-64. 10.1002/jez.b.20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Andrade MA, Bork P: HEAT repeats in the Huntington's disease protein. Nat Genet. 1995, 11: 115-116. 10.1038/ng1095-115.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Takano H, Gusella JF: The predominantly HEAT-like motif structure of huntingtin and its association and coincident nuclear entry with dorsal, an NF-kB/Rel/dorsal family transcription factor. BMC Neurosci. 2002, 3: 15-10.1186/1471-2202-3-15.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Andrade MA, Petosa C, O'Donoghue SI, Muller CW, Bork P: Comparison of ARM and HEAT protein repeats. J Mol Biol. 2001, 309: 1-18. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4624.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Harjes P, Wanker EE: The hunt for huntingtin function: interaction partners tell many different stories. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003, 28: 425-433. 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00168-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Goehler H, Lalowski M, Stelzl U, Waelter S, Stroedicke M, Worm U, Droege A, Lindenberg KS, Knoblich M, Haenig C, Herbst M, Suopanki J, Scherzinger E, Abraham C, Bauer B, Hasenbank R, Fritzsche A, Ludewig AH, Bussow K, Coleman SH, Gutekunst CA, Landwehrmeyer BG, Lehrach H, Wanker EE: A protein interaction network links GIT1, an enhancer of huntingtin aggregation, to Huntington's disease. Mol Cell. 2004, 15: 853-865. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Passamaneck YJ, Di Gregorio A: Ciona intestinalis: chordate development made simple. Dev Dyn. 2005, 233: 1-19. 10.1002/dvdy.20300.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen JY, Huang DY, Peng QQ, Chi HM, Wang XQ, Feng M: The first tunicate from the Early Cambrian of South China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100: 8314-8318. 10.1073/pnas.1431177100.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Vandenberghe AE, Meedel TH, Hastings KE: mRNA 5'-leader trans-splicing in the chordates. Genes Dev. 2001, 15: 294-303. 10.1101/gad.865401.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kozak M: Initiation of translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Gene. 1999, 234: 187-208. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00210-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Verrotti AC, Thompson SR, Wreden C, Strickland S, Wickens M: Evolutionary conservation of sequence elements controlling cytoplasmic polyadenylylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93: 9027-9032. 10.1073/pnas.93.17.9027.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee J, Park EH, Couture G, Harvey I, Garneau P, Pelletier J: An upstream open reading frame impedes translation of the huntingtin gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 5110-5119. 10.1093/nar/gkf664.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin B, Rommens JM, Graham RK, Kalchman M, MacDonald H, Nasir J, Delaney A, Goldberg YP, Hayden MR: Differential 3' polyadenylation of the Huntington disease gene results in two mRNA species with variable tissue expression. Hum Mol Genet. 1993, 2: 1541-1545.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Dehal P, Satou Y, Campbell RK, Chapman J, Degnan B, De Tomaso A, Davidson B, Di Gregorio A, Gelpke M, Goodstein DM, Harafuji N, Hastings KE, Ho I, Hotta K, Huang W, Kawashima T, Lemaire P, Martinez D, Meinertzhagen IA, Necula S, Nonaka M, Putnam N, Rash S, Saiga H, Satake M, Terry A, Yamada L, Wang HG, Awazu S, Azumi K, Boore J, Branno M, Chin-Bow S, DeSantis R, Doyle S, Francino P, Keys DN, Haga S, Hayashi H, Hino K, Imai KS, Inaba K, Kano S, Kobayashi K, Kobayashi M, Lee BI, Makabe KW, Manohar C, Matassi G, Medina M, Mochizuki Y, Mount S, Morishita T, Miura S, Nakayama A, Nishizaka S, Nomoto H, Ohta F, Oishi K, Rigoutsos I, Sano M, Sasaki A, Sasakura Y, Shoguchi E, Shin-i T, Spagnuolo A, Stainier D, Suzuki MM, Tassy O, Takatori N, Tokuoka M, Yagi K, Yoshizaki F, Wada S, Zhang C, Hyatt PD, Larimer F, Detter C, Doggett N, Glavina T, Hawkins T, Richardson P, Lucas S, Kohara Y, Levine M, Satoh N, Rokhsar DS: The draft genome of Ciona intestinalis: insights into chordate and vertebrate origins. Science. 2002, 298: 2157-2167. 10.1126/science.1080049.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Castrignano T, Canali A, Grillo G, Liuni S, Mignone F, Pesole G: CSTminer: a web tool for the identification of coding and noncoding conserved sequence tags through cross-species genome comparison. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: W624-7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Satou Y, Hamaguchi M, Takeuchi K, Hastings KE, Satoh N: Genomic overview of mRNA 5'-leader trans-splicing in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: 3378-88. Print 2006.. 10.1093/nar/gkl418.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Yuasa HJ, Kawamura K, Yamamoto H, Takagi T: The structural organization of ascidian Halocynthia roretzi troponin I genes. J Biochem (Tokyo). 2002, 132: 135-141.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Hastings KE: SL trans-splicing: easy come or easy go?. Trends Genet. 2005, 21: 240-247. 10.1016/j.tig.2005.02.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ganot P, Kallesoe T, Reinhardt R, Chourrout D, Thompson EM: Spliced-leader RNA trans splicing in a chordate, Oikopleura dioica, with a compact genome. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 7795-7805. 10.1128/MCB.24.17.7795-7805.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Beaudoing E, Freier S, Wyatt JR, Claverie JM, Gautheret D: Patterns of variant polyadenylation signal usage in human genes. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 1001-1010. 10.1101/gr.10.7.1001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Venkatesh B, Ning Y, Brenner S: Late changes in spliceosomal introns define clades in vertebrate evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 10267-10271. 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10267.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Wada H, Kobayashi M, Sato R, Satoh N, Miyasaka H, Shirayama Y: Dynamic insertion-deletion of introns in deuterostome EF-1alpha genes. J Mol Evol. 2002, 54: 118-128. 10.1007/s00239-001-0024-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Bates MD, Wells JM, Venkatesh B: Comparative genomics of the Hlx homeobox gene and protein: conservation of structure and expression from fish to mammals. Gene. 2005, 352: 45-56. 10.1016/j.gene.2005.03.021.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Edvardsen RB, Lerat E, Maeland AD, Flat M, Tewari R, Jensen MF, Lehrach H, Reinhardt R, Seo HC, Chourrout D: Hypervariable and highly divergent intron-exon organizations in the chordate Oikopleura dioica. J Mol Evol. 2004, 59: 448-457. 10.1007/s00239-004-2636-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Gilbert W: The exon theory of genes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1987, 52: 901-905.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Patthy L: Genome evolution and the evolution of exon-shuffling--a review. Gene. 1999, 238: 103-114. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00228-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Yandell M, Mungall CJ, Smith C, Prochnik S, Kaminker J, Hartzell G, Lewis S, Rubin GM: Large-scale trends in the evolution of gene structures within 11 animal genomes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006, 2: e15-10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020015.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Gissi C, Iannelli F, Pesole G: Complete mtDNA of Ciona intestinalis reveals extensive gene rearrangement and the presence of an atp8 and an extra trnM gene in ascidians. J Mol Evol. 2004, 58: 376-389. 10.1007/s00239-003-2559-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnson DS, Davidson B, Brown CD, Smith WC, Sidow A: Noncoding regulatory sequences of Ciona exhibit strong correspondence between evolutionary constraint and functional importance. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 2448-2456. 10.1101/gr.2964504.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. BLAST: Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/]
  47. GENSCAN. [http://genes.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html]
  48. Burge C, Karlin S: Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol. 1997, 268: 78-94. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0951.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. GenomeScan. [http://genes.mit.edu/genomescan.html]
  50. Yeh RF, Lim LP, Burge CB: Computational inference of homologous gene structures in the human genome. Genome Res. 2001, 11: 803-816. 10.1101/gr.175701.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. SGP2. [http://genome.imim.es/software/sgp2/]
  52. Parra G, Agarwal P, Abril JF, Wiehe T, Fickett JW, Guigo R: Comparative gene prediction in human and mouse. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 108-117. 10.1101/gr.871403.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. GMAP: A GEnomic Mapping and Alignment Program. [http://www.gene.com/share/gmap/]
  54. Wu TD, Watanabe CK: GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 1859-1875. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti310.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 4673-4680.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Swofford DL: PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Edited by: Associated S. 1998, Sunderland, Massachussets,Google Scholar
  57. Castresana J: Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000, 17: 540-552.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F: MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17: 754-755. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D: ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics. 2005, 12: 2104-2105. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti263.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. InterProScan. [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/InterProScan/]
  61. Quevillon E, Silventoinen V, Pillai S, Harte N, Mulder N, Apweiler R, Lopez R: InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: W116-20. 10.1093/nar/gki442.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Andrade MA, Ponting CP, Gibson TJ, Bork P: Homology-based method for identification of protein repeats using statistical significance estimates. J Mol Biol. 2000, 298: 521-537. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3684.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. REP. [http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/~andrade/papers/rep/search.html]
  64. RepeatMasker. [http://www.repeatmasker.org/]
  65. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. CSTminer: a web tool for the identification of coding and non-coding conserved sequence tags. [http://www.caspur.it/CSTminer/]
  67. UTRscan. [http://www.caspur.it/CSTminer/]
  68. Pesole G, Liuni S, Grillo G, Licciulli F, Mignone F, Gissi C, Saccone C: UTRdb and UTRsite: specialized databases of sequences and functional elements of 5' and 3' untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs. Update 2002. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 335-340. 10.1093/nar/30.1.335.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Grillo G, Licciulli F, Liuni S, Sbisa E, Pesole G: PatSearch: A program for the detection of patterns and structural motifs in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3608-3612. 10.1093/nar/gkg548.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gissi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement