Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Comparison of methods

From: PAVE: Program for assembling and viewing ESTs

  Contigsa Singletons Mate Splits Contigs Splita Contigs Merged Timeb
PAVE 5601c 0 0 186 0 3 h 25 m
TGICL 8888 71 16583 3401 12 25 m
CAP3 8811 342 16621 3454 15 2 h 12 m
  1. a Does not include singletons.
  2. b PAVE and TGICL used 4 processors, whereas CAP3 is not parallelized so used one processor.
  3. c 3514 contigs are joined by n's where 53 of them are single-mate pair contigs.