Skip to main content

Table 3 Variability of recombination fraction (θ) for the UMNP891-UMNP93 interval among INRA F1 female individuals, and among groups of females grouped according to their maternal and paternal haplotypes1.

From: Recombinational landscape of porcine X chromosome and individual variation in female meiotic recombination associated with haplotypes of Chinese pigs

No. of sub-family2 F1 sows Paternal haplo-type Maternal haplo-type N θ F1 maternal haplo-type N θ F1 paternal haplo-type N θ
1 910002 2413 1122 76 0.053 3 1122 243 0.103 2413 574 0,059
  910009 2413 1122 72 0.139 1222 526 0.055 5113 235 0,055
  910010 2413 1122 95 0.116 3221 38 0.105 5413 141 0,043
  910013 2413 4311 55 0 4311 138 0.007 6323 78 0,090
2 910014 5113 1222 83 0.096 5221 83 0.012    
  910016 5113 3221 38 0.105       
  910020 5113 1222 68 0.015       
3 910018 5113 4311 46 0       
4 910069 2413 1222 62 0.032       
  910071 2413 1222 68 0.044       
  910072 2413 1222 63 0.048       
  910074 2413 5221 83 0.012       
5 910084 6323 1222 51 0.118       
  910086 6323 1222 27 0.037       
6 910095 5413 1222 62 0.048       
  910096 5413 1222 42 0.048       
  910097 5413 4311 37 0.027       
Kosambi distance (cM)      5.86    5.86    5.86
Morton test      39.24    23.61    1.96
Df      16    4    3
P value      0.0010    0.0001    0.5800
  1. 1In the region UMNP891-UMNP93, 4 microsatellite markers (UMNP891, MCSE347J6, SW1522, UMNP93) and 7 SNPs were genotyped. For simplicity, we indicated the haplotypes with only microsatellites alleles because they reveal all individual haplotypes formed by all markers analysed on these animals.
  2. 2Each sub-family consists of F1 full-sisters.
  3. 3The θ of the F1 full-sisters within the first subfamily are highlighted in bold because they showed the largest difference in θ (P = 0.0026).