Skip to main content

Table 6 Coverage analysis for each library

From: Bioinformatic analysis of ESTs collected by Sanger and pyrosequencing methods for a keystone forest tree species: oak

Sequencing method#

Library code

A

B

Number of contigs in OakContigV1 (C)

Coverage (%) C/A

S

A

7550.3

-1.17E-04

5122

67.8%

S

B

5186.4

-1.73E-04

3420

65.9%

S

F

2515.9

-3.59E-04

1353

53.8%

S

H

8802.1

-1.02E-04

5809

66.0%

S

I

12232.2

-6.82E-05

7485

61.2%

S

J

4218.9

-2.03E-04

3487

82.7%

S

K

10541.7

-8.48E-05

5158

48.9%

S

L

8623.1

-1.04E-04

4704

54.6%

S

M

11485.6

-7.02E-05

7409

64.5%

S

O

1920.3

-4.77E-04

1141

59.4%

S

P

7184.0

-1.22E-04

4005

55.7%

S

S

7542.7

-1.11E-04

4816

63.8%

S

T

4194.4

-2.02E-04

3385

80.7%

P

I

20631.3

-3.29E-05

18245

88.4%

P

II

23225.8

-2.69E-05

21314

91.8%

P

III

16931.9

-4.31E-05

14169

83.7%

P

IV

26459.2

-2.03E-05

25038

94.6%

P

V

29306.1

-1.94E-05

27081

92.4%

P

VI

23674.9

-2.72E-05

20702

87.4%

P

VII

23941.0

-2.78E-05

21381

89.3%

P

VIII

27733.7

-2.22E-05

25588

92.3%

P

IX

21725.9

-2.42E-05

21620

99.5%

P

X

19916.9

-2.80E-05

19645

98.6%

P

XI

23860.4

-1.98E-05

24265

101.7%

P

XII

17736.9

-2.61E-05

17830

100.5%

P

XIII

18021.2

-2.71E-05

18065

100.2%

P

XIV

20576.5

-2.41E-05

20616

100.2%

  1. Library codes are as in Tables 1 and 4.
  2. #S: Sanger method; P: pyrosequencing method