Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 6 Coverage analysis for each library

From: Bioinformatic analysis of ESTs collected by Sanger and pyrosequencing methods for a keystone forest tree species: oak

Sequencing method# Library code A B Number of contigs in OakContigV1 (C) Coverage (%) C/A
S A 7550.3 -1.17E-04 5122 67.8%
S B 5186.4 -1.73E-04 3420 65.9%
S F 2515.9 -3.59E-04 1353 53.8%
S H 8802.1 -1.02E-04 5809 66.0%
S I 12232.2 -6.82E-05 7485 61.2%
S J 4218.9 -2.03E-04 3487 82.7%
S K 10541.7 -8.48E-05 5158 48.9%
S L 8623.1 -1.04E-04 4704 54.6%
S M 11485.6 -7.02E-05 7409 64.5%
S O 1920.3 -4.77E-04 1141 59.4%
S P 7184.0 -1.22E-04 4005 55.7%
S S 7542.7 -1.11E-04 4816 63.8%
S T 4194.4 -2.02E-04 3385 80.7%
P I 20631.3 -3.29E-05 18245 88.4%
P II 23225.8 -2.69E-05 21314 91.8%
P III 16931.9 -4.31E-05 14169 83.7%
P IV 26459.2 -2.03E-05 25038 94.6%
P V 29306.1 -1.94E-05 27081 92.4%
P VI 23674.9 -2.72E-05 20702 87.4%
P VII 23941.0 -2.78E-05 21381 89.3%
P VIII 27733.7 -2.22E-05 25588 92.3%
P IX 21725.9 -2.42E-05 21620 99.5%
P X 19916.9 -2.80E-05 19645 98.6%
P XI 23860.4 -1.98E-05 24265 101.7%
P XII 17736.9 -2.61E-05 17830 100.5%
P XIII 18021.2 -2.71E-05 18065 100.2%
P XIV 20576.5 -2.41E-05 20616 100.2%
  1. Library codes are as in Tables 1 and 4.
  2. #S: Sanger method; P: pyrosequencing method