Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the mapping quality and distribution between concordantly and discordantly mapping read pairs

From: Structural variation in the chicken genome identified by paired-end next-generation DNA sequencing of reduced representation libraries

Chromosome

Number of mapping read pairs

Average mapping quality

Mapping density

RRL density

1

5329141

15630

67.92

69.11

38

12860

1148

2

3968343

15049

68.14

71.29

39

10291

1149

3

3344481

11031

68.87

68.20

34

10303

1119

4

2758645

8155

68.53

70.40

34

11555

1098

5

1975228

5390

68.53

67.93

32

11547

1065

6

1258393

2782

68.31

69.69

30

13443

1056

7

1336228

4669

68.78

65.41

29

8221

1053

8

1119526

2866

68.63

72.82

27

10702

1067

9

1016524

3232

68.16

69.65

25

7907

1028

10

761372

2725

68.20

69.52

30

8278

1044

11

677920

1381

68.56

68.70

32

15879

1050

12

864303

3039

68.33

69.74

24

6758

989

13

780565

2107

68.47

66.72

24

8976

966

14

740461

3512

67.86

69.36

21

4504

929

15

669260

1378

68.56

68.47

19

9411

916

20

722054

2501

68.78

68.27

19

5592

911

Z

1845751

11981

68.05

68.79

40

6227

1271

  1. The number of concordant and discordant (in italics) mapping read pairs per chromosome are given. The average mapping quality of concordantly and discordantly mapping read pairs was calculated per chromosome. By calculating the mapping density, the distribution of mapping read pairs over the genome were evaluated. Mapping density was calculated by dividing the chromosome length by the number of concordantly/discordantly mapping read pairs. RRL density was calculated to ascertain the contribution of the RRL approach to differences in mapping density. RRL densities were calculated by dividing the chromosome length by the (in silico) estimated number of RRL fragments.