| Start sampling |
8.weeks
|
17.weeks
|
---|
| | Control | 0.25% TTA | Control | 0.25% TTA |
---|
Weight[g] | 102 ± 5 | 166 ±1 | 165 ±1 | 438 ±4 | 440 ±2 |
CF1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ±0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 |
LI2 | 0.82 ±0.05 | 1.00 ±0.02 | 1.07 ±0.07 | 1.43 ±0.04 | 1.41 ± 0.04 |
CSI3 | 0.074 ±0.002 | 0.092 ±0.001 | 0.094 ±0.001 | 0.101±0.002 | 0.103 ± 0.002 |
Mortality[%] | | 0.74 ± 0.18 | 0.41 ± 0.27 | 2 ± 0.23 | 2 ± 0.21 |
Muscle fat content4[%] | | 4.2a±0.1 | 3.9b±0.1 | 6.5±0.4 | 6.8±0.1 |
- Values within the same row with different subscripts are significantly different (p≤ 0.05, t-test). Mean ± SEM, the statistical unit is the mean of the net pen (n = 3). 19 fish were used to calculate the net pen mean.
- 1Condition factor (CF) =.
- 2Liver index (LI) = 100.
- 3Cardio somatic index (CSI) = 100.
- 4Muscle samples (NQC: Norwegian quality cut) from 10 fish/cage were pooled to analyse the muscle fat content.