Skip to main content

Table 1 Identification of 38 candidate SNP markers linked to anthracnose disease resistance gene Lanr1 in cultivar Tanjil of Lupinus angustifolius L by NGS based RAD sequencing

From: Application of next-generation sequencing for rapid marker development in molecular plant breeding: a case study on anthracnose disease resistance in Lupinus angustifolius L.

Candidate markers Ten plants susceptible to anthracnose disease Ten plants resistant to anthracnose disease
  PS* F 8 S1 F 8 S2 F 8 S3 F 8 S4 F 8 S5 F 8 S6 F 8 S7 F 8 S8 F 8 S9 PR* F 8 R1 F 8 R2 F 8 R3 F 8 R4 F 8 R5 F 8 R6 F 8 R7 F 8 R8 F 8 R9
Candidate marker 1 a** a a a a a a a - a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 2 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 3 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b - b b b
Candidate marker 4 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 5 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 6 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 7 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 8 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 9 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b - b b b b b
Candidate marker 10 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 11 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 12 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 13 a a a a - a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 14 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 15 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b - b b b
Candidate marker 16 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 17 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 18 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b - b b b b b
Candidate marker 19 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 20 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 21 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 22 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 23 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 24 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 25 a a a a - a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 26 a a a - a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 27 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b - b b b
Candidate marker 28 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 29 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 30 a a a a a a a - a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 31 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 32 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 33 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 34 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 35 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b -
Candidate marker 36 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 37 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
Candidate marker 38 a a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b b b b
  1. *PS = Parental cultivar Unicrop which is susceptible to anthracnose disease; PR = parental cultivar Tanjil which is resistant to anthracnose.
  2. **The nucleotides of the SNP markers corresponding to the disease susceptible parent Unicrop were recorded as “a”; the nucleotides of the SNP markers corresponding to the disease resistant parent Tanjil were recorded as “b”; missing data were recorded as “-”.