Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparisons between Chinese Spring cDNA transcripts and assembled transcripts

From: Optimizing de novo common wheat transcriptome assembly using short-read RNA-Seq data

51,449 Chinese Spring (CS) ESTs Trinity Trans-ABySS
  AFSFASSS AFSF + ASSS AF + SF + AS + SS AFSFASSS AFSF + ASSS AF + SF + AS + SS
% of CS ESTs hit 92.64% 93.97% 93.60% 92.89% 91.65% 90.63%
(% of bases covered) 85.82% 87.97% 87.91% 87.73% 85.72% 83.99%
% of CS ESTs hit with at least 98% of identity 51.56% 65.21% 76.07% 73.98% 71.58% 69.19%
(% of bases covered) 59.46% 65.15% 69.54% 81.52% 79.25% 77.08%