Table 1 Performance for optimizing the combination of two drugs.
|  | Gur Game (simultaneous) | Gur Game (sequential) | Previous search algorithm[11](α= 1) | ARU algorithm (proposed) (α= 1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | success rate | unique comb. | success rate | unique comb. | success rate | unique comb. | success rate | unique comb. | |
f2a(x) : HIV INHIBITION | (M = 80) | 97% | 13.2 | 95% | 17.2 | 100% | 13.4 | 100% | 12.1 |
f2b(x) : DE JONG (2ND) | (M = 441) | 9% | 3.6 | 10% | 4.5 | 99% | 56.2 | 99% | 46.2 |
f2c(x) : CANCER INHIBITION | (M = 100) | 58% | 11.3 | 53% | 13.0 | 98% | 13.2 | 98% | 12.4 |
f2d(x): BACTERIA INHIBITION | (M = 81) | 96% | 5.9 | 91% | 6.8 | 100% | 4.8 | 100% | 4.5 |