Table 1 The power comparisons at different proportions of causal variants
From: A probabilistic method for identifying rare variants underlying complex traits
Total | Causal | RareProb | RareCover | RWAS | LRT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 | 50 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
200 | 50 | 100% | 100% | 99.6% | 99.9% |
400 | 50 | 100% | 100% | 85.3% | 88.6% |
600 | 50 | 100% | 94.6% | 54.1% | 58.8% |
800 | 50 | 100% | 0.0% | 33.0% | 36.5% |
1000 | 50 | 100% | 0.0% | 20.7% | 22.0% |
2000 | 50 | 100% | 0.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% |
3000 | 50 | 100% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
4000 | 50 | 100% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% |
5000 | 50 | 100% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
200 | 1* | 51.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
400 | 3* | 77.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
600 | 2* | 63.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
800 | 3* | 57.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
1000 | 3* | 59.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
2000 | 1* | 34.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
3000 | 2* | 41.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
4000 | 3* | 40.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
5000 | 2* | 29.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |