Skip to main content

Table 3 Map positions and descriptive statistics for each of the putative QTLs underlying variation in life history traits and phototactic response for D. magna

From: An SNP-based second-generation genetic map of Daphnia magna and its application to QTL analysis of phenotypic traits

LG QTL [cM] 95% CI Length of CI Marker LOD Additive (SE) Dominance (SE) % variance
Body size
2 176.5 161.6 – 185.6 24.0 scaffold01446_1050 5.2 0.050 (0.010) 0.011 (0.015) 11.7
3 72.0 61.5 – 96.6 35.1 contig23286_629 5.4 0.054 (0.011) -0.006 (0.015) 12.0
6 11.1 5.1 – 74.3 69.2 contig28688_84 4.0 -0.040 (0.011) 0.027 (0.015) 9.1
10 14.6 3.1 – 24.4 21.3 contig53311_380 4.1 0.045 (0.011) 0.012 (0.015) 9.2
Lifetime offspring production (= fecundity)
1 7.32 0.8 – 12.6 11.8 scaffold00772_255 6.6 23.968 (4.199) -1.767 (6.244) 14.6
3 124.7 118.9 – 139.2 20.3 scaffold01201_3880 3.8 -10.091 (5.075) 18.740 (7.363) 8.6
7 91.8 76.8 – 101.9 25.1 scaffold01869_1276 4.2 16.472 (4.466) -16.117 (6.400) 9.5
8 96.4 86.9 – 105.7 18.8 scaffold01126_2577 3.9 12.526 (4.623) -17.220 (6.706) 9.0
Difference in phototactic response
6 164.0 126.0 – 136.0 10.1 scaffold00892_2305 3.6 0.016 (0.026) -0.169 (0.042) 8.2
  1. For each QTL, the location (linkage group (LG) and cM location), 95% confidence interval (CI) of the QTL region, name of nearest marker, lod-score (LOD), effect size (additive and dominance) with standard error (SE) and percent phenotypic variance explained is shown.