Skip to main content

Table 1 Metacrangonyctidae mitochondrial genome information

From: Next-generation sequencing, phylogenetic signal and comparative mitogenomic analyses in Metacrangonyctidae (Amphipoda: Crustacea)

Species Code Accession number Sequencing method Average read length Coverage Length A + T AT skew GC skew
M. longipes (Mallorca) LON AM944817 Sanger N/A N/A 14113 76.029 -0.017 -0.035
M. longipes (Menorca) SFM HE861923 GS Junior 437 87× 14117 74.995 -0.015 -0.042
M. repens REP HE860495 Sanger 550 5.7× 14354 76.878 -0.025 -0.014
“L. stocki” (Tafraut) HOM HE860496 GS Junior 395 160× 12924 73.336 -0.099 0.174
“M. boutini boutini” BBM HE860497 GS Junior 433 107× 13301 69.799 -0.078 0.152
“M. boveei” VOB HE860498 GLX 511 100× 15012 72.589 -0.009 0.005
M. dominicanus DOM HE860499 Sanger 625 4.3× 14536 73.652 -0.016 -0.026
M. goulmimensis (Erfoud) LMG HE860500 GS Junior 413 178× 14503 69.737 -0.016 -0.028
M. goulmimensis (Ousroutou) OUM HE860501 GS Junior 454 100× 14602 74.873 -0.020 -0.037
M. goulmimensis (Zouala) ZOM HE860502 GS Junior 423 165× 14352 75.516 -0.028 -0.046
M. ilvanus ILV HE860503 GLX 540 78× 14770 74.563 -0.014 -0.012
“M. nicoleae tamri” (Tamri) TAM HE860504 GLX 595 59× 14644 75.130 -0.062 0.120
M. samanensis PFM HE860505 Sanger 551 5.7× 14057 74.141 -0.016 -0.034
M. spinicaudatus SKM HE860506 GLX 534 124× 15037 74.789 0.010 -0.139
“M. paurosexualis” SKP HE860507 GS Junior 424 94× 12542 75.546 -0.037 0.024
“L. stocki” (Tiznit) ASL HE860508 GS Junior 431 103× 12747 72.519 -0.096 0.161
M. longicaudus LML HE860509 GS Junior 403 135× 14710 75.819 -0.014 -0.051
M. panousei AGM HE860510 GS Junior 453 80× 14478 76.150 -0.012 -0.051
“M. nicoleae tamri” (Aksri) AKM HE860511 GS Junior 411 145× 13517 74.018 -0.049 0.111
M. remyi REM HE860512 GLX 454 281× 14787 70.785 -0.014 0.017
“M. notenboomi” MAM HE860513 GS Junior 420 168× 14277 74.385 -0.019 -0.043
  1. Numbers in bold indicate complete mitogenomes; rest of mitogenomes are only partial since some regions (usually the AT-rich region or a short fragment between rrnS and rrnL genes) were not sequenced due to technical problems. Species not formally described yet are quoted with a tentative latinized binomen within inverted commas, and not in italics.