Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison between CNVRs detected in the study with those in the previous reports

From: Global copy number analyses by next generation sequencing provide insight into pig genome variation

Study

CNVR detected in the previous studies

Overlaps with this study

 

Methods

Sample

CNVR

Range (kb)

Median (kb)

Mean (kb)

Total (Mb)

Count

Count percentage (%)

Total length (kb)

Length percentage (%)

Fadista et al., 2008 [35]

aCGH (385 k)

12

37

1.74-61.92

6.89

9.32

0.43

3

0.0958

21.435

0.0208

Ramayo-Caldas et al., 2010 [24]

SNP chip (60 k)

55

49

44.65-10715.82

170.96

754.59

36.97

3

0.0958

408.541

0.3974

Wang et al., 2012 [25]

SNP chip (60 k)

474

382

5.03-2702.75

142.90

250.69

95.76

61

1.9483

1845.698

1.7953

Li et al., 2012 [36]

aCGH (720 k)

12

259

2.30-1550

98.74

65.07

16.85

77

2.4593

2197.924

2.1379

Chen et al., 2012 [39]

SNP chip (60 k)

1693

565

50.39-8102.06

252.71

247.55

139.87

284

9.0706

15386.182

14.9658

Wang et al., 2013 [40]

SNP chip (60 k)

14

63

3.20 -827.21

97.85

158.37

9.98

24

0.7665

2302.633

2.2397

Rubin et al., 2012 [42]

Genome sequencing

117

1,928

0.12-175.50

3.00

5.23

10.08

305

9.7413

6777.8

6.5926

Paudel et al., 2013 [41]

Genome sequencing

16

3,118

6.00-96.00

10.00

12.74

39.72

479

15.298

16537.356

16.086

All the above

 

—

—

—

—

—

—

849

27.116

33018.169

32.116

  1. Note: The comparison was based on Sscrofa 10.2 assembly (http://www.ensembl.org/Sus_scrofa/Info/Index). For CNVRs based on the other porcine assembly, we firstly converted the data to current genome coordinates using the UCSC LiftOver tool (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgLiftOver).