Table 4 Comparisons.
From: Efficient and scalable scaffolding using optical restriction maps
Length | Method | Correctly placed | Accuracy | Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5 × 105 bp | GPA1 | 49 | 98.00% | 5.87 |
| Â | GPA2 | 49 | 98.00% | 4.65 |
| Â | GPA3 | 49 | 98.00% | 4.62 |
| Â | Nagarajan et al. [5] | 30 | 60.00% | 1620 |
6 × 105 bp | GPA1 | 50 | 100.00% | 8.52 |
| Â | GPA2 | 50 | 100.00% | 7.12 |
| Â | GPA3 | 50 | 100.00% | 7.12 |
| Â | Nagarajan et al. [5] | 32 | 64.00% | 14400 |
7 × 105 bp | GPA1 | 49 | 98.00% | 8.79 |
| Â | GPA2 | 49 | 98.00% | 8.19 |
| Â | GPA3 | 49 | 98.00% | 8.48 |
| Â | Nagarajan et al. [5] | - | - | - |
8 × 105 bp | GPA1 | 50 | 100.00% | 11.77 |
| Â | GPA2 | 50 | 100.00% | 11.70 |
| Â | GPA3 | 50 | 100.00% | 10.64 |
| Â | Nagarajan et al. [5] | - | - | - |