Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparative analysis of Spodoptera frugiperda SF-21-derived ESTs with Sf9- and midgut-derived ESTs1.

From: Analysis and functional annotation of expressed sequence tags from the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda

  S. frugiperda Sf9ESTs S. frugiperda midgutESTs
  Contig Singlets Total Contig Singlets Total
Homology N % N % N % N % N % N %
E ≤ 0 243 99.59 176 18.51 419 35.06 7 2.87 81 8.52 88 7.36
0 < E ≤ 10-150 0 0.00 37 3.89 37 3.10 2 0.82 17 1.79 19 1.59
10-150 < E ≤ 10-100 0 0.00 47 4.94 47 3.93 4 1.64 16 1.68 20 1.67
10-100 < E ≤ 10-50 0 0.00 58 6.10 58 4.85 0 0.00 24 2.52 24 2.01
10-50 < E ≤ 10-20 0 0.00 49 5.15 49 4.10 1 0.41 30 3.15 31 2.59
10-20 < E ≤ 10-5 0 0.00 50 5.26 50 4.18 4 1.64 72 7.57 76 6.36
Total matched 243 99.59 417 43.85 660 55.23 18 7.38 240 25.24 258 21.59
No match 1 0.41 534 56.15 535 44.77 226 92.62 711 74.76 937 78.41
Total 244 100 951 100 1195 100 244 100 951 100 1195 100
  1. 1 SF-21 ESTs, this report; Sf9 ESTs [12]; midgut ESTs (NCBI dbEST)