Skip to main content

Table 1 Hubs and clustered nodes in the luminal ER- network.

From: Transcriptome analysis of mammary epithelial subpopulations identifies novel determinants of lineage commitment and cell fate

Hub

knode

Cnode

Differentially expressed neighbours

Physical interaction content

Transcriptional interaction content

CCL5*

17

0.000

0

35%

65%

TLR4*

17

0.103

2

82%

18%

TNF*

15

0.000

0

13%

87%

BCL2*

14

0.000

2

60%

40%

LY96*

14

0.154

2

100%

0%

KIT*

13

0.013

3

92%

8%

CCL2*

10

0.000

0

40%

60%

LYN*

10

0.022

1

100%

0%

ERBB3*

9

0.194

3

100%

0%

SP1

9

0.000

8

0%

100%

FAS*

8

0.000

0

25%

75%

MUC1*

8

0.143

1

100%

0%

GRB2

7

0.000

6

100%

0%

UBQLN4

7

0.000

6

100%

0%

CD82*

6

0.133

1

100%

0%

KRT18*

6

0.067

1

83%

17%

NFKB1

6

0.000

5

0%

100%

ATXN1

5

0.000

4

100%

0%

CD14*

5

0.100

2

40%

60%

CREB1

5

0.000

4

20%

80%

EGFR

5

0.300

4

100%

0%

ERBB2

5

0.300

4

100%

0%

MAPK1

5

0.000

4

100%

0%

PIK3R1

5

0.000

4

100%

0%

RPS6KA5*

5

0.000

0

100%

0%

SPI1

5

0.000

4

0%

100%

  1. *Differentially-expressed genes. Knode, node connectivity, Cnode, node clustering coefficient, calculated as Cnode = 2 nnode/(knode (knode - 1)) where nnode is the number of interactions between the hub first neighbours. Hubs exhibiting clustering are shown in bold. High content of physical or transcriptional interactions in the hub is shown in bold.