Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of MEC and runtimes for different schemes applied to Fosmid data

From: SDhaP: haplotype assembly for diploids and polyploids via semi-definite programming

chr #

Fosmid

 

CPLEX

SDhaP

RefHap

HAPCUT

HapTree

 

MEC

t(in secs)

MEC

t(in secs)

MEC

t(in secs)

MEC

t(in secs)

MEC

t(in secs)

1

6889

480

7297

8.07

8051

2.61

9550

600

9676

6501

2

6700

451

7214

7.84

7910

2.65

9661

660

9802

7196

3

5122

420

5588

6.49

6111

2.969

7557

360

7705

4847

4

4072

360

4510

5.41

4880

1.81

6265

540

6500

8392

5

4637

762

5029

6.2

5558

2.15

6919

480

7094

5670

6

5248

471

5674

7.26

6341

2.093

7958

2700

7

4174

464

4509

5.02

4961

2.07

6062

480

6169

5589

8

4301

347

4785

5.09

5092

2.0

6255

615

6379

8316

9

3974

191

4200

4.7

4591

1.76

5463

376

5513

4465

10

4508

270

4765

5.04

5357

2.52

6445

454

6553

4838

11

3903

150

4165

4.63

4620

2.23

5558

457

5625

5183

12

3907

159

4174

5

4686

2.18

5654

360

5770

5654

13

2669

137

2946

3.0

3155

1.1

3967

291

4029

5367

14

2814

413

2971

3.35

3244

1.89

3978

302

4038

4103

15

2903

138

3029

3.09

3341

1.54

4007

250

4116

3357

16

3844

221

4022

4.84

4438

1.66

5086

570

5142

9683

17

3448

295

3586

3.41

4159

1.86

4743

251

4806

3003

18

2337

288

2555

2.69

2801

1.39

3445

240

3493

2303

19

2707

70

2857

2.78

3406

1.35

3898

180

3953

1984

20

2783

305

2943

3.08

3295

1.72

3810

203

3886

1529

21

1367

72

1452

1.44

1601

1.05

1951

134

1979

1410

22

2422

175

2508

3.21

2876

1.69

3260

118

3307

1351

  1. MEC and running times for CPLEX, SDhaP, HAPCUT, RefHap and HapTree haplotype assembly strategies applied to Fosmid data. SDhaP is more accurate than the other schemes except CPLEX and significantly faster than HapCUT or HapTree. For chromosome 6, HapTree did not complete its run within 48 hours and hence the corresponding entry is missing.