Skip to main content

Table 1 TFs differentially expressed due to abiotic stresses

From: De novo transcriptome analysis of Medicago falcata reveals novel insights about the mechanisms underlying abiotic stress-responsive pathway

TF family

DS

 

SS

 

CS

 

Increase

Decrease

Increase

Decrease

Increase

Decrease

NAC

62

 

33

 

12

 

MYB-related

30

19

17

9

16

12

bHLH

32

20

18

2

9

3

AP2-EREBP

26

 

15

6

15

10

WRKY

31

4

10

1

9

3

FAR1

19

8

6

2

6

3

MADS

24

 

10

 

3

 

Orphans

25

2

10

1

7

 

C2H2

13

3

11

3

4

5

C3H

15

4

10

2

1

 

G2-like

4

12

3

2

2

4

Dof

 

6

8

7

 

3

GRAS

15

 

2

1

1

3

bZIP

10

2

5

3

1

5

SET

12

1

8

 

4

 

PHD

11

2

1

 

1

1

Pseudo-ARR

7

2

2

2

2

 

LBD

10

 

4

 

4

 

ARF

6

2

3

   
  1. TFs with altered expression patterns between the abiotic-stressed samples and standard samples were used. The numbers of individual transcripts within a TF family exhibiting increased or decreased expression (a 2-fold or greater change) in the abiotic-stressed samples compared with the standard sample are shown
Back to article page

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us