Skip to main content

Table 5 Our ISREs predict Ψ more accurately than [9]’s

From: Does conservation account for splicing patterns?

 

Our ISREs n = 132

[9] n = 574

Random n = 574

Counts

0.644 ± 0.006

0.601 ± 0.008

0.609 ± 0.008

+NMD

0.810 ± 0.006

0.788 ± 0.005

0.805 ± 0.006

Cons

0.693 ± 0.006

0.608 ± 0.008

0.615 ± 0.007

  1. AUCs for absolute Ψ prediction using k-mer counts, counts plus two nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) features from [12], and conservation-weighted counts for various k-mer sets. The conservation weight of each k-mer instance is the minimum conservation over its k bases, to avoid counting non-functional k-mer instances that partially overlap functional ones. Our ISREs predict Ψ more accurately than [9]’s, which perform no better than the same number of random k-mers