Comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genomes of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides sensu lato: insights into the evolution of a fungal species complex interacting with diverse plants

Table 1 The Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH) test result

Tree^a	Value types^b	ACT	TUB2	CAL	GADPH	CHS	GS	SOD2
Mito	-ln L	435.06	1154.96	1272.82	512.87	504.86	1754.51	815.79
ApMAT	Diff -ln L	0	−18.64	−4.96	0	3.18	−6.38	−2.01
ApMAT	P-value	/	0.0433	0.1901	/	0.2279	0.1519	0.203
Nucl	Diff -ln L	0	−10.63	−14.26	13.98	12.48	−145.73	−2.01
Nucl	P-value	/	0.1872	0.0893	0.0798	0.0819	0*	0.203
GSSOD-excluded	Diff -ln L	0	−18.64	−4.75	−5.24	−2.77	17.18	−2.01
GSSOD-excluded	P-value	/	0.0447	0.204	0.1472	0.276	0.0203	0.203
GS-excluded	Diff -ln L	0	−10.63	−4.75	13.98	−20.16	17.18	−39.27
GS-excluded	P-value	/	0.1926	0.204	0.0756	0.0626	0.0201	0.0076*
SOD-excluded	Diff -ln L	0	−10.63	−14.26	13.98	12.48	−145.73	−2.01
SOD-excluded	P-value	/	0.1894	0.0905	0.0776	0.0823	0*	0.203

^a The ‘Mito’ tree was compared with the ‘ApMAT’ tree, concatenated nuclear tree (‘Nucl’), ‘GSSOD-excluded’ tree, ‘GS-excluded’ tree, and ‘SOD-excluded’ tree based on indicated datasets. Tree topologies are shown in Fig. 8
^bFor the ‘Mito’ tree, ‘-ln L’ represents the -ln^{(likelihood score)} value. For each compared tree, ‘Diff -ln L’ represent the differences between their -ln^{(likelihood score)} values and that of the ‘Mito’ tree. Negative value indicates that the dataset supports the tested tree better than the ‘Mito’ tree. The P-value for each test is reported and ‘*’ indicates P < 0.01. ‘/’ indicates equal -ln^{(likelihood score)} values in which case SH test could not be performed

ISSN: 1471-2164