Hypothesis | â–³lnL | AU | BP | PP | KH | WKH | SH | WSH |
---|
H1 | Best |
0.756
|
0.721
|
0.977
|
0.73
|
0.73
|
0.966
|
0.986
|
H2 | 3.7 |
0.297
|
0.273
| 0.023 |
0.27
|
0.27
|
0.693
|
0.555
|
H3 | 25.3 | 0.011 | 0.006 | 1.00E-11 | 0.014 | 0.014 |
0.176
| 0.026 |
H4 | 27.9 | 0.003 | 4.00E-05 | 7.00E-13 | 0.007 | 0.007 |
0.145
| 0.022 |
H5 | 118.1 | 8.00E-65 | 0 | 5.00E-52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Note: Tree Hypothesis: H1. This study; H2. (Other CladeA + Cardamineae) + Lepidieae; H3. (((A, E), (B, C)), F); H4. (((A, (B, C)), E), F); H5. Megadenia within Clade C. △lnL: the observed log-likelihood difference. AU approximately unbiased test, BP bootstrap probability test, PP approximate Bayesian posterior probability, KH Kishino-Hasegawa test, WKH weighted Kishino-Hasegawa test, SH Shimodaira-Hasegawa test, WSH weighted Shimodaira-Hasegawa test. P values >0.05 are in bold. The topology for each alternative hypothesis is provided in Additional file 2: Figure S1