Integrated QTL detection for key breeding traits in multiple peach progenies

Hernández Mora, José R.; Micheletti, Diego; Bink, Marco; Van de Weg, Eric; Cantín, Celia; Nazzicari, Nelson; Caprera, Andrea; Dettori, Maria Teresa; Micali, Sabrina; Banchi, Elisa; Campoy, José Antonio; Dirlewanger, Elisabeth; Lambert, Patrick; Pascal, Thierry; Troggio, Michela; Bassi, Daniele; Rossini, Laura; Verde, Ignazio; Quilot-Turion, Bénédicte; Laurens, François; Arús, Pere; Aranzana, Maria José

doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3783-6

BMC Genomics

Table 3 Accuracies with original (raw) and standardized data (STD1 and STD2)

From: Integrated QTL detection for key breeding traits in multiple peach progenies

Progenies	FD^a			MD^b			FDP^c			PSC^e			TA^e			SSC^f			FW^g
Progenies	raw	STD1	STD2	raw	STD1	STD2	raw	STD1	STD2	raw	STD1	STD2	raw	STD1	STD2	raw	STD1	STD2	raw	STD1	STD2
BxO	-	-	-	0.91	0.91	0.87	-	-	-	0.76	0.82	0.80	0.69	0.85	0.85	0.78	0.80	0.81	0.87	0.90	0.90
CxEL	-	-	-	0.88	0.90	0.89	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
MxR028	-	-	-	0.97	0.97	0.96	-	-	-	0.69	0.75	0.73	0.94	0.94	0.93	0.87	0.82	0.84	0.86	0.88	0.90
BbxNl	0.95	0.96	0.97	0.95	0.86	0.84	0.93	0.78	0.74	-	-	-	0.98	0.96	0.92	0.89	0.88	0.85	0.93	0.91	0.91
BtxNr	0.79	0.71	0.72	0.94	0.93	0.92	0.95	0.86	0.85	-	-	-	0.89	0.82	0.82	0.82	0.77	0.75	0.70	0.61	0.64
BtxAk	0.49	0.53	0.45	0.80	0.93	0.88	0.82	0.86	0.84	-	-	-	0.88	0.83	0.80	0.69	0.68	0.70	0.79	0.81	0.84
RSx25	0.94	0.95	0.93	0.40	0.84	0.71	0.33	0.92	0.60	0.40	0.87	0.88	0.71	0.92	0.65	0.67	0.92	0.51	0.89	0.91	0.92
RSx61	0.89	0.92	0.90	0.88	0.92	0.85	0.90	0.96	0.91	0.58	0.74	0.63	0.69	0.92	0.71	0.38	0.92	0.65	0.85	0.89	0.88
BoxBo	1.00	0.83	0.71	0.58	0.62	0.63	0.58	0.51	0.55	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.92	0.99	0.99
JxF	0.96	0.92	0.87	0.93	0.87	0.88	0.92	0.89	0.88	0.71	0.67	0.68	0.94	0.81	0.80	0.65	0.61	0.62	0.85	0.87	0.89
WFxP	0.89	0.70	0.67	0.28	0.74	0.76	0.75	0.72	0.73	-	-	-	0.73	0.67	0.67	0.32	0.28	0.30	-	-	-
PxR	0.35	0.92	0.87	0.69	0.73	0.68	0.63	0.68	0.67	0.74	0.71	0.72	0.84	0.80	0.79	0.33	0.29	0.31	-	-	-
PxF	0.95	0.90	0.89	0.78	0.81	0.79	0.86	0.83	0.83	0.72	0.74	0.72	0.44	0.61	0.62	0.62	0.57	0.59	0.73	0.66	0.75
RxD	0.78	0.69	0.62	0.27	0.72	0.92	0.77	0.65	0.64	0.66	0.61	0.52	-	-	-	0.94	0.73	0.65	-	-	-
SxD	0.76	0.91	0.84	0.84	0.85	0.82	0.81	0.78	0.80	0.77	0.80	0.76	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
TxE	0.75	0.71	0.75	0.96	0.90	0.88	0.93	0.84	0.78	-	-	-	0.69	0.65	0.54	0.76	0.78	0.80	0.22	0.25	0.30
T1E	0.59	0.58	0.50	0.97	0.90	0.88	0.93	0.76	0.72	-	-	-	0.79	0.85	0.81	0.53	0.46	0.47	0.47	0.40	0.30
BC2	0.99	0.99	0.99	0.90	0.94	0.91	0.97	0.90	0.89	0.96	0.93	0.95	0.93	0.85	0.86	0.91	0.89	0.86	0.96	0.97	0.99
All progenies	0.98	0.92	0.87	0.91	0.89	0.85	0.94	0.83	0.83	0.84	0.80	0.75	0.91	0.82	0.77	0.82	0.74	0.68	0.91	0.88	0.89

Correlation between progenies phenotypes and their estimated genome-wide breeding values (GBV) (accuracy) was obtained for ^aflowering date (FD), ^bmaturity date (MD), ^cfruit development period (FDP), ^dpercentage of red skin color on the fruit skin (PSC), ^etitratable acidity of the fruit flesh (TA), ^fsoluble solid content of the fruit flesh (SSC) and ^gweight of the whole fruit (FW))

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us

Submission enquiries: bmcgenomics@biomedcentral.com
General enquiries: ORSupport@springernature.com