Skip to main content

Table 2 The comparison of the performance when a constant learning rate and a decreasing learning rate are applied

From: A maximum likelihood algorithm for reconstructing 3D structures of human chromosomes from chromosomal contact data

 

Constant Learning Rate

Decreasing Learning Rate

Input Parameters

Running Time

Accuracy

(Average dSCC)

Running Time

Accuracy

(Average dSCC)

CHR = 1-22, NUM_STR = 1, ALPHA = constant

4 min

0.821

13 s

0.8493

CHR = 1-22, NUM_STR = 1, ALPHA = [0.1, 2]

1 h, 30 min

0.8456

3 min

0.8536

CHR = 1-22, NUM_STR = 5, ALPHA = [0.1, 2]

7 h

0.8546

20 min

0.8546

CHR = 1, NUM_STR = 1, ALPHA = constant

37 s

0.7556

2 s

0.8088

CHR = 1, NUM_STR = 5, ALPHA = [0.1, 2]

1 h

0.7841

3 min

0.8088

CHR = 21, NUM_STR = 1, ALPHA = constant

0.7 s

0.8969

0.2 s

0.8995

CHR = 21, NUM_STR = 5, ALPHA = [0.1, 2]

36 s

0.9018

2 s

0.9018

CHR = 21, NUM_STR = 30, ALPHA = [0.1, 2]

4 min

0.9018

12 s

0.9018

CHR = 21, NUM_STR = 50, ALPHA = [0.1, 2]

6 min

0.9021

18 s

0.9018

CHR = 21, NUM_STR = 100, ALPHA = [0.1, 2]

12 min

0.9020

37 s

0.9020

CHR = 21, NUM_STR = 200, ALPHA = [0.1, 2]

24 min

0.9022

83 s

0.9020

CHR = 21, NUM_STR = 500, ALPHA = [0.1, 2]

1 h

0.9022

3 min

0.9021

  1. The comparison of the computing time and the average dSCC value obtained by using a constant or a decreasing learning rate for different input parameters for the chromosome 1 – 22 of the GM06990 cell line. We used the constant learning rate 0.0001, and we defined the initial_λ = 0.01 for the decreasing learning rate. CHR represents the chromosome number, and NUM_STR represents the number of ensemble structures generated per conversion factor(α), ALPHA represents the conversion factor. The decreasing learning rate achieved a better computing speed in all the cases