Table 12 Prediction results of different methods on the independent testing dataset ZD98 by jackknife test
| Â | Jackknife test (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Methods | Sensitivity for each class (%) | OA (%) | |||
Cy | Me | Mi | Other | ||
ID [93] | 90.7 | 90.0 | 92.3 | 91.7 | 90.8 |
ID_SVM [39] | 95.3 | 93.3 | 84.6 | 58.3 | 88.8 |
DF_SVM [21] | 97.7 | 96.7 | 92.3 | 75.0 | 93.9 |
FKNN [40] | 95.3 | 96.7 | 100 | 91.7 | 95.9 |
PseAAC_SVM [95] | 95.3 | 93.3 | 92.3 | 83.3 | 92.9 |
DWT_SVM [41] | 95.4 | 93.3 | 53.9 | 91.7 | 88.8 |
APSLAP [97] | 95.3 | 90.0 | 100 | 91.7 | 94.9 |
Liu et al. [43] | 95.3 | 100 | 100 | 91.7 | 96.9 |
PSSM_AC [98] | 97.7 | 96.7 | 100 | 83.3 | 95.9 |
EBGW_SVM [15] | 97.7 | 90.0 | 92.3 | 83.3 | 92.9 |
DCCA coefficient [46] | 93.0 | 86.7 | 92.3 | 75.0 | 88.9 |
PsePSSM-DCCA-LFDA | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |