Skip to main content

Table 1 Top 10 significantly differentially expressed miRNAs between M-exo vs E-exo/Con-exo/M-cell

From: Alterations in exosomal miRNA profile upon epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human lung cancer cell lines

M-exo vs E-exo

miRNA_ID

M-exo

E-exo

up/down

|log2(fold change)|

P-value

miR-26a-5p

342.32

161.34

up

1.09

2.10E-13

miR-92b-3p

65.09

219.15

down

1.75

1.64E-11

miR-193a-5p

16.66

69.67

down

2.06

3.14E-11

miR-424-3p

15.12

68.51

down

2.18

1.43E-10

miR-181b-5p

139.99

62.18

up

1.17

2.40E-09

miR-143-3p

101.23

41.20

up

1.30

3.62E-09

miR-125a-5p

110.20

282.86

down

1.36

2.32E-08

miR-193b-5p

27.52

103.43

down

1.91

2.63E-08

miR-92a-3p

1115.32

2646.67

down

1.25

1.10E-07

miR-3184-3p

641.22

2490.33

down

1.96

1.33E-07

M-cell vs E-cell

miRNA_ID

M-exo

E-exo

up/down

|log2(fold change)|

P-value

miR-143-3p

476.7317

15.61803

up

4.931893

1.04E-244

miR-181a-2-3p

225.878

62.4662

up

1.854396

9.44E-59

miR-4483

21.115

117.744

down

2.479313

1.16E-21

miR-145-5p

15.63757

0

up

17.25466

1.05E-14

miR-4521

38.8255

123.3244

down

1.667382

6.41E-13

miR-1180-3p

119.0278

254.7887

down

1.098002

8.95E-11

miR-494-3p

47.59617

22.741

up

1.06555

2.24E-09

miR-654-3p

44.7572

20.77677

up

1.107149

2.64E-09

miR-365a-5p

48.06983

23.8603

up

1.01052

8.64E-09

miR-370-3p

27.4212

9.933367

up

1.464937

1.48E-08

M-exo vs Con-exo

miRNA_ID

M-exo

Con-exo

up/down

|log2(fold change)|

P-value

miR-205-5p

8.22

4634.82

down

9.14

2.31E-188

miR-200c-3p

10.84

2762.23

down

7.99

1.45E-63

miR-192-5p

6328.30

700.17

up

3.18

4.67E-56

miR-148a-3p

243.13

6603.26

down

4.76

1.15E-55

miR-10a-5p

289.49

16.94

up

4.09

2.83E-52

miR-203a-3p

22.32

395.25

down

4.15

3.08E-40

miR-381-3p

83.07

3.12

up

4.74

8.54E-34

miR-584-5p

0.00

67.33

down

19.36

1.46E-33

miR-409-3p

44.56

1.92

up

4.54

2.96E-17

miR-127-3p

65.47

5.16

up

3.67

1.45E-18

E-exo vs Con-exo

miRNA_ID

E-exo

Con-exo

up/down

|log2(fold change)|

P-value

miR-205-5p

7.21

4634.82

down

9.33

3.58E-137

miR-10a-5p

561.77

16.94

up

5.05

7.58E-75

miR-148a-3p

321.91

6603.26

down

4.36

5.40E-62

miR-192-5p

8828.24

700.17

up

3.66

1.64E-51

miR-200c-3p

11.53

2762.23

down

7.90

3.65E-49

miR-203a-3p

25.61

395.25

down

3.95

3.58E-38

miR-409-3p

76.15

1.92

up

5.31

1.04E-35

miR-26a-5p

161.34

1570.80

down

3.28

7.03E-35

miR-584-5p

0.43

67.33

down

7.30

4.54E-34

miR-193a-5p

69.67

1.66

up

5.39

7.01E-34

M-exo vs M-cell

miRNA_ID

M-exo

M-cell

up/down

|log2(fold change)|

P-value

miR-1290

687.15

26.38

up

4.70

2.42E-49

miR-320c

83.16

19.92

up

2.06

2.65E-49

miR-1246

1104.80

185.33

up

2.58

7.24E-49

miR-4497

362.06

2.97

up

6.93

6.46E-47

miR-146b-5p

137.29

40.88

up

1.75

4.34E-43

miR-7704

42.93

2.45

up

4.13

2.40E-35

miR-5787

42.62

0.00

up

18.70

4.57E-21

miR-423-5p

163.74

61.46

up

1.41

1.31E-17

miR-7641

17.91

0.26

up

6.11

2.14E-16

miR-4532

11.44

0.00

up

16.80

7.88E-13

  1. The expression levels were showed by the number of reads per million clean tags (RPM). The mean values of three triplicate experiments showed in the table. The edgeR bioconductor package was used to analyze the difference between groups and calculate the P values