Table 3 Comparison of our study with 31 previous bovine CNV studies conducted using various platforms
From: Genome-wide detection of copy number variations in polled yak using the Illumina BovineHD BeadChip
Study | Platform | Breed | Sample | CNVR count | CNVR length(percentage) | Overlapping CNVR count with present study | Overlapping percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liu et al., 2010 [31] | CGH | 17 | 90 | 200 | 36.2 Mb (1.4%) | 41 | 20.5% |
Fadista et al., 2010 [30]* | CGH | 4 | 20 | 224 | 9.4 Mb (0.37%) | 18 | 8.0% |
Kijas et al., 2011 [45]* | CGH | 3 | 9 | 19 | 4.4 Mb (0.18%) | 3 | 15.8% |
Zhang et al., 2014 [46]* | CGH | 14 | 27 | 339 | 32.8 Mb (1.3%) | 46 | 13.6% |
Zhang et al., 2015a [47]* | CGH | 12 | 24 | 275 | 21.7 Mb (0.86%) | 36 | 13.1% |
Bickhart et al., 2016 [48] | CGH | 8 | 75 | 1853 | 87.5 Mb (3.1%) | 240 | 13.0% |
Bae et al., 2010 [29]* | 50 K | 1 | 265 | 359 | 62.7 Mb (2.5%) | 66 | 18.4% |
Hou et al., 2011 [32] | 50 K | 21 | 521 | 682 | 139.8 Mb (5.5%) | 209 | 30.6% |
Hou et al., 2012b [11]* | 50 K | 1 | 472 | 811 | 130.0 Mb (5.2%) | 185 | 22.8% |
Jiang et al., 2012 [49]* | 50 K | 1 | 2047 | 96 | 23.9 Mb (0.95%) | 37 | 38.5% |
Wang et al., 2015 [50] | 50 K | 1 | 492 | 334 | 51.3 Mb (2.0%) | 80 | 24.0% |
Gurgul et al., 2015 [51] | 50 K | 2 | 1160 | 106 | 176.6 Mb (7.0%) | 51 | 48.1% |
Hou et al., 2012a [33] | BovineHD | 27 | 674 | 3438 | 146.9 Mb (5.8%) | 542 | 15.8% |
Jiang et al., 2013 [41] | BovineHD | 1 | 96 | 367 | 42.7 Mb (1.6%) | 94 | 25.6% |
Wu et al., 2015 [52] | BovineHD | 1 | 792 | 263 | 35.5 Mb (1.4%) | 53 | 20.2% |
Zhang et al., 2015b [53] | BovineHD | 1 | 6 | 365 | 13.1 Mb (0.52%) | 65 | 17.8% |
da Silva et al., 2016a [15] | BovineHD | 1 | 1509 | 4097 | 1078.5 Mb (42.9%) | 736 | 18.0% |
da Silva et al., 2016b [18] | BovineHD | 1 | 723 | 2649 | 170.6 Mb (6.8%) | 546 | 20.6% |
Sasaki et al., 2016 [54] | BovineHD | 1 | 791 | 861 | 43.7 Mb (1.7%) | 189 | 22.0% |
Xu et al., 2016 [55] | BovineHD | 8 | 300 | 263 | 15.6 Mb (0.62%) | 40 | 15.2% |
Zhou et al., 2016a [56] | BovineHD | 1 | 2230 | 231 | 70.4 Mb (2.8%) | 57 | 24.7% |
Zhou et al., 2016b [57] | BovineHD | 1 | 1682 | 4562 | 186 Mb (7.5%) | 629 | 13.8% |
Prinsen et al., 2016 [58] | BovineHD | 1 | 1410 | 563 | 57.6 Mb (2.3%) | 112 | 19.9% |
Upadhyay et al., 2017 [34] | BovineHD | 38 | 149 | 923 | 61.1 Mb (2.4%) | 224 | 24.3% |
Yang et al., 2017 [59] | BovineHD | 8 | 167 | 3356 | 148.0 Mb (5.8%) | 574 | 17.1% |
Karimi et al., 2018 [60] | BovineHD | 1 | 90 | 221 | 36.4 Mb (1.4%) | 59 | 26.7% |
Stothard et al., 2011 [35]* | Resequencing | 2 | 2 | 693 | 3.8 Mb (0.15%) | 78 | 11.3% |
Bickhart et al., 2012 [36]* | Resequencing | 3 | 5 | 1032 | 41.1 Mb (1.6%) | 128 | 12.4% |
Ben Sassi et al., 2016 [61] | Resequencing | 1 | 10 | 823 | 45.4 Mb (1.8%) | 90 | 10.9% |
Choi et al., 2016 [62] | Resequencing | 2 | 20 | 901 | 5.5 Mb (0.22%) | 137 | 15.2% |
Gao et al., 2017 [16] | Resequencing | 1 | 8 | 400 | 6.9 Mb (0.27%) | 36 | 9% |
Present study | BovineHD | 1 | 215 | 1066 | 181.6 Mb (7.2%) | – | – |