Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparative analysis between results of the proposed method and other studies

From: iEnhancer-ECNN: identifying enhancers and their strength using ensembles of convolutional neural networks

 

Method

ACC

AUC

SN

SP

MCC

Source

Enhancer Identification

iEnhancer-2L

0.730

0.806

0.710

0.750

0.460

Liu et al., 2016

 

EnhancerPred

0.740

0.801

0.735

0.745

0.480

Jia and He, 2016

 

iEnhancer-EL

0.748

0.817

0.710

0.785

0.496

Liu et al., 2018

 

iEnhancer-ECNN

0.769

0.832

0.785

0.752

0.537

This study

Enhancer Classification

iEnhancer-2L

0.605

0.668

0.470

0.740

0.218

Liu et al., 2016

 

EnhancerPred

0.550

0.579

0.450

0.650

0.102

Jia and He, 2016

 

iEnhancer-EL

0.610

0.680

0.540

0.680

0.222

Liu et al., 2018

 

iEnhancer-ECNN

0.678

0.748

0.791

0.564

0.368

This study

  1. Values which are significantly higher than the others are in bold